Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Shiv Fair Price Shop Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1072/2008 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 M/S.SHIV FAIR PRICE SHOP ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.R.P. Luthra, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan and Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned cancellation order dated 1.9.2007 issued by Assistant Commissioner (EAST) and order dated 15.1.2008 passed by the Commissioner in appeal preferred by the petitioner against the cancellation order dated 1.9.2007 of Asstt. Commissioner (W).2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner is a proprietary c...
National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd Vs. Moala Jamir
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order: February 20, 2015 + W.P.(C) 1583/2015 NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Jayant Pawar, Advocate MOALA JAMIR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Padma Kumar Senior Advocate with Mr.Krishna Kumar Mishra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.173/2015 Since respondent has caused his appearance through Mr.Padma Kumar, Senior Advocate, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. Appl. No.2827/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.1583/2015 & C.M. Appl. No.2826/2015 (Stay) By this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 13.11.2014 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.3889/2013. Assailing the aforesaid order...
Nizamuddin Vs. Ramzani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h February, 2015. + CONT.CAS(C) 117/2015 NIZAMUDDIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Sharma and Ms. Dezy Gaur, Advs. Versus RAMZANI Through: ..... Respondent/Alleged contemnor None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.2982/2015 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) No.117/2015 & CM No.2981/2015 (for stay) 3. The respondent, in this petition under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, is averred to be in civil contempt (within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the said Act) for the reason of, inspite of having arrived at a settlement with the petitioner that both will withdraw cases filed against each other and in terms of which settlement the petitioner withdrew complaints (pending in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate (MM)-11, Central Delhi, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM)-01, Central Delhi, MM-06, Cen...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Smt Saroj and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 960/2012 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus SMT SAROJ & ORS. Through ..... Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of `15,98,016/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) for the death of Sanjeev Kumar, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 21st December, 2010.2. As per the claim made by the Respondents, the deceased was working as a helper and was earning `9,000/- per month. In the absence of any evidence with regard to the deceaseds income, the Claims Tribunal took minimum wages as of matriculate i.e. ` 6448/- per month as the deceaseds income, deducted 1/3rd towards personal and living expenses, added 50% towards future prospects and applied multiplier of 16 to compute the loss of...
Shri Rajneesh Kumar Vs. State Farms Corporation of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1672/2012 20th February, 2015 % SHRI RAJNEESH KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. Versus STATE FARMS CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the action of the respondent/employer/State Farms Corporation of India Ltd terminating the services of the petitioner-a probationary officer on the ground that the performance of the petitioner during the period of probation was not found to be satisfactory. The impugned order is dated 17.11.2011 and which reads as under:SFCI/PF-1168/2009-GA Dated:17. h Nov., 2011 OFFICE ORDER WHEREAS Shri Rajneesh Kumar was appointed to the post of Marketing Manager vide offer of appointment No.SFCI/2-6/2009-GA dated 3.11.2009 and he joined the services of ...
Ashok Kumar and Anr. Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 17/2011 Decided on 20th February, 2015 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through .... Appellants Mr.Sunil Chaudhary, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr.Yogesh Verma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. By the judgment dated 19th November, 2010 appellants have been convicted under Sections 452/308/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). Appellant no.2 has been given benefit of The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 by the trial court and has been released on probation of two years of good behaviour and to maintain peace, on furnishing personal bond of `30,000/- with one surety in the like amount vide order on sentence dated 24th November, 2010. Appellant no.1, by the same order, has been sentenced to undergo three years of rigorous imprisonment under Section 452 IPC with a fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of three month...
Rai Foundation Thr. Its Trustee Suresh Sachdev Vs. The Director Direct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 100/2015 Decided on 20th February, 2015 RAI FOUNDATION THR. ITS TRUSTEE SURESH SACHDEV Through ..... Petitioner :Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pawan Sharma and Mr. Anuj Shah, Advs. versus THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ORS ..... Respondents Through :Mr. Sanjeev Narula and Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advs. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.566/2015 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 100/2015 3. Joint Director, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India, Kolkata has passed a provisional attachment order dated 28 th October, 2014 under sub-section 1 of Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (the Act, for short) whereby has attached certain properties, as detailed in the said order, including that of petitioner. Adjudication proceedings have started and are pending before the...
the Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Smt. Manura and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 471/2014 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Soni Raman, Advocate versus SMT. MANURA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondents 1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11.03.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.9,94,456/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 to 4 for the death of Surju @ Subhan who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 03.12.2007.2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased was working as a cook in a hotel at Bhogal and was earning Rs.8,000/- to Rs.10,000/- per month. MAC APP4712014 appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the accident was caused because of rash and negligent driving of bus no.DL-1PA-2...
Billa K Oil Depot Vs. The Assitant Commissioner (South),
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)1744/2008 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 BILLA K OIL DEPOT Through : ..... Petitioner Counsel for the petitioner versus THE ASSITANT COMMISSIONER (SOUTH), FOOD & SUPPLIES, DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan & Ms.Latika Dutta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned cancellation order dated 12.10.2007 issued by Asstt. Commissioner (South) and order dated 17.1.2008 passed by Secretary-cum-Commissioner in appeal preferred by the petitioner against the cancellation order dated 12.10.2007 of Asstt. Commissioner (South).2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition a...
Icici Lombard General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Pramila and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1121/2012 and CM No.17976/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus PRAMILA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Rohan Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal relates to reduction of compensation awarded for the death of Kramveer Singh. It is brought to the notice of the Court that Respondent No.7 has expired. This Death Certificate has been produced. Respondent No.7 was the mother of the deceased. The other Claimants are the widow and the children of the deceased. In view of the death of Respondent No.7, the name of Ram Devi/Respondent No.7 is deleted from the array of parties.2. The appeal is filed for reduction of compensation of Rs. 35,99,347/- granted to the Respondents for the death of Kramveer Singh, who had died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 30th May...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »