Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rattan Lal @ Pinki Vs. Vasdev
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. NO.219 OF2014% Date of decision :20. h February, 2015 RATTAN LAL @ PINKI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Amit Punj, Advocate versus VASDEV Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Gurbaksh Singh and Ms. Richa, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant filed a suit for specific performance against the respondent, which was decreed by the learned Trial Court. The respondents appeal against the decree of specific performance was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge resulting in the setting aside of the decree. The learned first appellate Court while dismissing the plaintiffs suit for specific performance directed the defendant to refund Rs.1,00,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum to the plaintiff. The appellant has approached this Court in second appeal. For the sake of convenience, the appellant and the respondent are referred to as per their ranks in the plaint as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.2....
Sandeep Popli Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~107 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 652/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2493/2015 SANDEEP POPLI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Karuna Chatwal, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Daya Kishan Mr. Bijay Mohan Goswami, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.362/2009, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Uttam Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms find mention the order of 28th November, 2014 of matrimonial court. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Bijay Mohan Goswami, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 652/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is compla...
Bali Ram@bhool and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~108 & 109 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 656/2015 JAWAHAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Chhittar Singh Respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 657/2015 BALI RAM @ BHOOL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. I.S. Sharma, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Chhittar Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % CRL.M.C. 656 & 657 of 2015 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Page 1 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.359/2003, under Sections 147/148/149/427/323 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 656/2015]. and FIR No.361/2003 under Sections 147/148/149/427/323/324/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 657/2015]. both registered...
Natwar Rateria Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:20. h February, 2015 % + CRL. M.C. 4648/2014 NATWAR RATERIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advocate. versus CBI Through: .....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 03.09.2014 passed by learned Special Judge-II, CBI, Rohini Courts, Delhi whereby the application moved by the petitioner for cessation of proceedings against him, has been dismissed.2. Filtering unnecessary details, the relevant facts of the present case are that the petitioner was charge-sheeted along with Mr. Dalip Singh Judev as co-accused. The allegations as per the case set-up in the charge-sheet are that in a sting operation conducted on 05.11.2003 at Room No.822, Hotel Taj Maan Singh, New Delhi, accused Dalip Singh Judev (hereinafter referred to as accused ...
M/S.Mohan Lal Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 358/2008 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 M/S.MOHAN LAL Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.P.K. Goel, Advocate versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan & Ms.Latika Dutta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned show cause notice dated 05.9.2007.2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition, as per the petition are that the husband of the petitioner (Sh.Mohan Lal) had been granted licence no.66/72 for running the Kerosene Oil Depot (for short, KOD) at Nangloi under Circle No.25, which was renewed from time to time and upto 28.6.2008. A copy of t...
the Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Warish Ahmed and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 668/2014 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Soni Raman, Advocate versus WARISH AHMED & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Brij Kishore Roy, Advocate for Respondent nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of `13,35,000/awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) for the death of Rahish Ahmed who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 02.05.2006.2. The Claims Tribunal accepted the income of the deceased on the basis of his Income Tax Return(ITR) to be `64,832/(rounded off `65,000/-) per annum, deducted 1/3rd towards personal and living expenses and made addition of 50% towards future prospects to compute the loss of dependency at `11,70,000/-.3. The only ground of challenge raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant at the time of hearing of...
Rai Foundation Thr. Its Trustee Mr.Suresh Sachdev Vs. The Director, Di ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 331/2015 Decided on 20th February, 2015 RAI FOUNDATION THR. ITS TRUSTEE MR.SURESH SACHDEV Through ..... Petitioner :Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pawan Sharma and Mr. Anuj Shah, Advs. versus THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ORS ..... Respondents Through :Mr. Sanjeev Narula and Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advs. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.2483/2015 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 331/2015 3. Joint Director, Eastern Region, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India, Kolkata has passed a provisional attachment order dated 9th January, 2015 under sub-section 1 of Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (the Act, for short) whereby has attached certain properties, as detailed in the said order, including that of petitioner. Adjudication proceedings have started and are...
Khanna Store Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8089/2007 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 KHANNA STORE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Pradeep Gupta, Advocate versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan and Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned show cause notice dated 24.10.2007 issued by Assistant Commissioner (NW).2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition are that the Sh.Gian Chand Khanna, is the proprietor of the petitioner (M/s.Khanna Store); the petitioner had been granted licence on 13.7.1982 for running the Fair Price Shop (for short, FPS) No.6330 in Circle ...
Brham Prakash Vs. The Assistance Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1122/2008 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 BRHAM PRAKASH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Nitin Sehgal, Advocate versus THE ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER FOOD & SUPPLIES (EAST) ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan and Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned cancellation order dated 31.10.2007 issued by Assistant Commissioner (East).2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner is a proprietorship concern, which had been granted licence for running the Fair Price Shop (for short, FPS) No.5789 at 16/72, Kalyan Puri, Delhi, in the year 1986 ...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Salma Farheen and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 633/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate with Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate versus SALMA FARHEEN & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mohd. Elahi, Advocate for Respondent 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of Rs.41,30,100/awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) in favour of a young girl Salma Farheen, who suffered serious injuries in her right lower limb and brain in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 16.09.2006.2. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that there was only 50% disability in respect of the claimants left lower limb. There is moderate level mental disability. The Claims Tribunal erred in assessing loss of earning capacity to the extent of 90%. It is urged that the Claims Tribunal erred in taking the loss of...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »