Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nahar Singh and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~61 & 62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 3364/2013 HARI SARAN SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Balvinder Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Gopi Chand Respondent No.2-Nahar Singh in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 3623/2013 NAHAR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Balvinder Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Gopi Chand Respondent No.2-Hari Sharan Mishra in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3364 & 3623 of 2013 Page 1 On the intervening night of 18th-19th July, 2005, a quarrel had taken place during the reception party at the house of Naresh Kumar and in respect of this incident, FIR No.281/2005 for the offences under Sections 452/323/147/14...
Dr. ( Mrs.)Radhika Bahl Vs. D.K. Upadhyaya Dig (Pers)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 148/2013 DR. ( MRS.)RADHIKA BAHL ..... Petitioner Through: Mrs. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tinu Bajwa, Mr. Amandeep Joshi & Ms. Priyam Mehta, Advs. Versus D.K. UPADHYAYA DIG (PERS) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 20.02.2015 1. Contempt is averred of the judgment dated 20 th September, 2011 in W.P.(C) No.2475/2011 filed by the petitioner. Vide para no.15 of the said judgment, it was held that the petitioner would be entitled to have her seniority reckoned from the date she was initially appointed. Vide para no.19 of the said judgment, a mandamus was issued to the Competent Authority to treat the writ petition as a representation praying that power be exercised under Rule 88 of the CCS Pension Rules and applicability of SubRule 6 of Rule 26 of CCS Pension Rules be waived qua the petitioner and to take a decision thereon within sixteen weeks.2. T...
Ramesh Chander Gupta Vs. Kanta Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. NO.66 OF2014Date of decision :20. h February, 2015 % RAMESH CHANDER GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Munish Tyagi, Advocate versus KANTA GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Advocate as amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant instituted a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondent which was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge. The appellants first appeal has been dismissedz. The appellant has approached this Court in second appeal. For the sake of convenience, the appellant and the respondent are referred as per their rank in the plaint as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.2. The plaintiff and the defendant jointly purchased shop No.8, Market A-5B/A-5C, Janak Puri, New Delhi measuring 136.25 square feet (hereinafter referred to as the suit property) from Delhi Development Authority in an auction on 19th May, 1975. The plaintiff claims to have paid the e...
Jawahar Singh and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~108 & 109 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 656/2015 JAWAHAR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Chhittar Singh Respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 657/2015 BALI RAM @ BHOOL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. I.S. Sharma, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Chhittar Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % CRL.M.C. 656 & 657 of 2015 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Page 1 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.359/2003, under Sections 147/148/149/427/323 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 656/2015]. and FIR No.361/2003 under Sections 147/148/149/427/323/324/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 657/2015]. both registered...
Pradeep Kumar Arora Vs. The State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~106 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 650/2015 PRADEEP KUMAR ARORA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Khan, Advocate versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI, & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Jager Singh Respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.68/2015, under Sections 304A/337 of IPC registered at police station Janak Puri, Delhi is sought on the ground that the incident in question was purely accidental and there was no negligence on the part of petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that respondent No.2-Lala Rama-injured and respondent No.3-Subhash Chand, brother of the deceased, have been duly compensated and so, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for CRL.M.C. 650/2015...
Ravi Kumar and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 640/2015 RAVI KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Dr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Raj Malik Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.97/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Chandani Mahal, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms find mention in the joint statement of the parties made before Mahila Court on 22nd May, 2014 and on the ground that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are living together happily since May, 2014. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identifie...
Desraj and Ors. Vs. The State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 623/2015 & Crl.M.As.2419-20/2015 DESRAJ & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma and Mrs. Puja Gulshan Kumar, Advocates versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State ASI Rajneesh Mr. Javed Husain, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.217/2010, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Saraswati Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms are reflected in the joint statement of the parties made before Mahila Court on 12th February, 2013 and affidavit of respondent No.2. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Javed Husain, Advocate, accepts CRL.M.C. 623/2015 Page 1 notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Le...
Manoj Kumar @ Vicky Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~105 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 648/2015 MANOJ KUMAR @ VICKY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Prabhakaran Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.267/2007, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Delhi Cantt., Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 4th September, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (Annexure-D). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Prabhakaran on the basis of identity CRL.M.C. 648/2015 Page 1 proof produced by her. ...
Kishan and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~88 & 89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 621/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2416/2015 KISHAN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Kapil Singhal, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Narendra Singh Respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 622/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2418/2015 SUDESH & ORS Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Gaurav Kochar, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Narendra Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % CRL.M.C. 621 & 622 of 2015 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Page 1 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.22/2012, under Sections 323/341/308/504/506/427/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 621/2015]. and FIR No.23/2012 under Sections 323/341/308/ 452/504/506/34 of ...
Hari Saran Sharma and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~61 & 62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 3364/2013 HARI SARAN SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Balvinder Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Gopi Chand Respondent No.2-Nahar Singh in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 3623/2013 NAHAR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Balvinder Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Gopi Chand Respondent No.2-Hari Sharan Mishra in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3364 & 3623 of 2013 Page 1 On the intervening night of 18th-19th July, 2005, a quarrel had taken place during the reception party at the house of Naresh Kumar and in respect of this incident, FIR No.281/2005 for the offences under Sections 452/323/147/14...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »