Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Waste Management Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 3941/2011 DELHI WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr P.S. Bindra and Ms Shweta Priyadarshini. For the Respondent : Ms Mini Pushkarna with Ms Yootika Pallavi. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns a notice dated 25.05.2011 (hereafter impugned notice) calling upon the petitioner to remove four advertisements displayed on two Waste Storage Depots - Dhalaos (structures constructed for collection of waste) situated opposite Okhla, New Delhi and near Sant Nagar, New Delhi. The petitioner was also called upon to pay damage charges of `2,07,000/- for the month of May 2011 with respect to the aforesaid advertisements. The petitioner also impugns a letter dated 11.11.2010 (hereafter impugned letter) calling upon the petitioner to deposit monthly li...
Dr.Mukul Gupta Vs. Management Development Institute and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : February 10, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : February 20, 2015 + LPA No.59/2015 DR.MUKUL GUPTA Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Mr.Sameer Sharma, Mr.Lokesh Bhola and Mr.Anubhav Ray, Advocates versus MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE & ANR. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.S.K.Taneja, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rajat Arora and Ms.Kajal Srivastava, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appellant was the writ petitioner and has suffered a setback when vide impugned order dated January 27, 2015, the learned Single Judge has dismissed WP(C) No.7944/2014 filed by the appellant holding that the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition because no part of cause of action accrued at Delhi. That the registered office of the first respondent was at Delhi has be...
Aakash Deep Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 20, 2015 + LPA No.75/2015 AAKASH DEEP Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate with Mr.Nilansh Gaur, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Naveen Chawla, Advocate with Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Nikhal Nayyar, Advocate with Ms.Pratima Gupta, Advocate for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appellant filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the relief to quash the advertisement issued by respondent no.2/Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) inviting applications for appointment to the post of Executive Director (Law) and additionally for quashing the order dated November 11, 2014 passed by respondent No.2 putting on hold the appointment of the appellant to the post of ED (Law) in the respondent No.2. The subsequent order dated November 26, ...
Department of Transport Governmentof Nct of Delhi Vs. M/S Star Bus Ser ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on February 20, 2015 + ARB.A. 7/2015 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT GOVERNMENTOF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Amiet Andlay, Advocate versus M/S STAR BUS SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Somiran Sharma & Mr.Vishnu Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.This petition has been filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi challenging order dated January 23, 2015 passed in IA No.2/2015 by the Arbitral Tribunal of Mr.M.K.S Menon, Advocate.2. The operative part of order dated January 23, 2015 reads as under:In the said peculiar circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of contentions raised, I direct that the respondent shall not levy/impose any further "performance deductions" nor shall impose any penalty pursuant to notice dated 12.01.2015, till the next date of hearing. The application for interim relief shall be co...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited Vs. Fujitshu India Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:06. h February, 2015 Judgment Delivered on:20. h February, 2015 % + FAO(OS) 63/2015 and CM No.2069/2015 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED ....Appellant versus FUJITSHU INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants: Mr Krinshendu Datta with Mr Vivek Malik, Mr Mukul Thakur and Ms Nayan Aggarwal For the Respondent: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr Khalid Arshad, Mr Pradeep Nayak, Mr Abhishek Bansal and Mr Ishwer Upneja. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), impugns the judgment dated 25.11.2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the learned Single Judge had dismissed the objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Act. =======================================...
Bajaj Allianz Gen Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Meena and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~A-7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:20. 02.2015 + MAC.APP. 22/2011 and CM Nos.245/2011 (stay) & 8749/2011 (for release of amount) BAJAJ ALLIANZ GEN INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Rajat Brar, Advocate. versus MEENA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.R.K.Yashwant Singh, Advocate for R-1 to 5. Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate for R-7. + MAC.APP. 23/2011 and CM No.255/2011 (stay) BAJAJ ALLIANZ GEN INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Rajat Brar, Advocate. versus ANGOORI DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.S.K.Singh, Advocate for R-1 to 5. Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate for R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present two appeals are filed seeking to impugn the common award dated 15.11.2010.2. The brief facts are that on 03.04.2007 the deceased Kanahiya Lal (driver) and Sh.Giriraj (helper-cum-cleaner) were going on a truck to Madras via Bhopal from Delhi. In district Rajgarh, their truck was hit by ano...
Reserve Bank of India Vs. B S Rawat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 20, 2015 + LPA862015 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.H.S.Parihar, Mr.Kuldeep S.Parihar and Mr.Sankalp, Advocates versus B S RAWAT Represented by: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.2871-72/2015 Allowed. CM No.2870/2015 For the reasons states in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Application is allowed. LPA862015 1. The respondent, Sh.B.S.Rawat, was employed as a typist with the Reserve Bank of India when he was dismissed from service, meaning thereby he was not having any public dealings and had limited access to the record of the office of the Reserve Bank of India where he used to sit on the typewriter and type out such scripts as were given to him for typing. The limited record he would maintain was the rough and the fina...
Sumer Singh Salkan Vs. Reema and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:20. h February, 2015 % + I.A. No.3401/2013 & I.A. No.12048/2013 in CS(OS) 2315/2011 SUMER SINGH SALKAN Through ..... Plaintiff Ms.Malvika Rajkotia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ranjan N. & Ms.Anchal Kapoor, Advs. versus REEMA & ORS Through ..... Defendants Ms.Reema Salkan, D-1 in person as well as for D-7. Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Adv. for D-2. Mr.Siddharth Luthra, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Ferida Satarawala, Mr.Aditya & Mr.Shiv Pande, Advs. for D-3, 5 & 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of this order I propose to decide two applications; one being I.A. No.3401/2013 and another being I.A. No.12048/2013 both under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the defendant No.6 (Ranjit Narayan) and defendant No.5 (R.S. Yadav) respectively for rejection of the name of defendant No.5 and defendant No.6 from the array of parties.2. By the application being I.A. No.3401/2013 filed by the defendant No.6 it was ...
Ajay Dheer and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~103 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 644/2015 AJAY DHEER & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Harmeet Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Kusum Ms. Jyoti Rajshree, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.301/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Binda Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 13th March, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (Annexure-C). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Ms. Jyoti Rajshree, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-inf...
Sudesh and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~88 & 89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 20, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 621/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2416/2015 KISHAN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Kapil Singhal, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Narendra Singh Respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 622/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2418/2015 SUDESH & ORS Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Gaurav Kochar, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Narendra Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % CRL.M.C. 621 & 622 of 2015 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Page 1 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.22/2012, under Sections 323/341/308/504/506/427/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 621/2015]. and FIR No.23/2012 under Sections 323/341/308/ 452/504/506/34 of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »