Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2015 Page 1 of about 616 results (0.018 seconds)Bahadur Singh Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 773/2015 & Crl.M.A.2945/2015 BAHADUR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.P. Luthra, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Neeraj Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.197/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Mandawali, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 19th February, 2014 arrived at Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Delhi (Annexure-D). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Neeraj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 773/2015 Page 1 Respondent No.2, present i...
Tag this Judgment!Soma Isolux Kishangarh Beawar Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Vs. National Highways ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 531/2014 Reserved on: February 20, 2015 Decision on: February 27, 2015 SOMA ISOLUX KISHANGARH BEAWAR TOLLWAY PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dharmendra Rautray, Ms. Tara Shahani and Ms. Ankit, Advocates. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.P. Khurana, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tanu Priya, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Ms. Meenakshi Sood, Advocates along with Mr. Y.B. Singh, Project Director and Mr. B.N. Sahai, General Manager, NHAI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2702.2015 1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by the Petitioner, Soma Isolux Kishangarh Beawar Tollway Private Limited, seeking certain interim reliefs. Background facts 2. The background facts are that the Petitioner entered into a Concession Agreement (CA) with the Respondent National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to augment the road f...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Gupta Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1896/2014 RAJEEV SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner In person versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Parveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 2057/2014 SANJAY GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: In person versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Parveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above captioned first petition quashing of FIR No.18/2013, under Sections 448/420 of the IPC [Crl. M.C.No.1896/2015]. and in the above captioned second petition, FIR No.216/2012, under Sections Crl. M.C.No.1896/2014 Crl.M.C.No.2057/2014 Page 1 448/511 of the IPC [in Crl. M.C.No.2057/2014]., both registered at police station Vivek Vihar, Delhi are sought by petitioners on ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Tata Motors Ltd. Vs. State and Others
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:30. h January, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:27. h February, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 16/2008 M/S TATA MOTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sandeep Kapur and Ms. Apporva Pandey, Advocates . versus STATE & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K.Mishra, APP for State. Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Mr. Vaibhav Tomar and Mr. Som, Advs. for R-2 to R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 09.10.2007 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing the Criminal Complaint No.911/1/07 under Section 499, 500, 501 & 502 read with Section 34 and 25 IPC filed by the complainant/petitioner, the present revision petition has been filed by the complainant/petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner).2. Factual matrix, as emerges from the record, is that the petitioner was aggrieved by publication of an article titled: Peoples Car or Blood Car?. Is Ratan Tata bent on destroying...
Tag this Judgment!Ravinder Kumar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY18 2015 DECIDED ON : FEBRUARY27 2015 + CRL.A.84/2006 RAVINDER KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Ravinder Kumar is aggrieved by a judgment dated 30.11.2005 in Sessions Case No.04/05 emanating from FIR No.564/02 registered at Police Station Anand Vihar by which he was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Section 366/376 IPC. By an order dated 06.12.2005, he was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `2,000/- each under Section 366 and 376 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as projected in the charge- sheet was that on 16.10.2004 at about 07:30 a.m. at bus stop, Jagriti Enclave, Delhi, the appellant abducted X (assumed name), aged around 20 years, and sexually assaulted her till 21.10...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Sharma Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1896/2014 RAJEEV SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner In person versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Parveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 2057/2014 SANJAY GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: In person versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Parveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above captioned first petition quashing of FIR No.18/2013, under Sections 448/420 of the IPC [Crl. M.C.No.1896/2015]. and in the above captioned second petition, FIR No.216/2012, under Sections Crl. M.C.No.1896/2014 Crl.M.C.No.2057/2014 Page 1 448/511 of the IPC [in Crl. M.C.No.2057/2014]., both registered at police station Vivek Vihar, Delhi are sought by petitioners on ...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar and Ors. Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 757/2015 & Crl. M.A. 3019/2015 MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Niranjan Bhati and Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocates versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Dharamvir Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.124/2010, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Crime (Woman) Cell, New Delhi is sought on the ground that parties have reconciled all their differences and the fact that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are living together happily since July, 2014. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she CRL.M.C. 757/2015 Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Naveen Dabas Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 12.2014 Pronounced on:27. 02.2014 + CRL.A.740/2012 NAVEEN DABAS ..Appellant Through: Sh Jaideep Malik and Sh. Aman Saroha, Advocates. Versus STATE + Respondent Through: Sh. Varun Goswami, APP, for the State. Insp. Lalit Kumar, PS Mandir Marg. Insp. Sudhir Kumar, PS Begumpur. SI Sandeep Tushir, PS Begumpur. CRL.A.1091/2012 REKHA ..Appellant Through: Ms. Anu Narula and Sh. Kunal Arora, Advocates. Versus STATE Respondent Through: Sh. Varun Goswami, APP, for the State. Insp. Lalit Kumar, PS Mandir Marg. Insp. Sudhir Kumar, PS Begumpur. SI Sandeep Tushir, PS Begumpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Crl.A.740/2012 & 1091/2012 Page 1 1. The present appeals preferred, by the accused challenge a common judgment dated 08.05.2012 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini, Delhi in S.C. No.90/2011. By the impugned judgment, the appellants (hereafter referred to a...
Tag this Judgment!Rohit Yadav Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5692/2014 & Crl.M.A.19461/2014 ROHIT YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Tomar, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Prit Pal Singh Mr. Deepak, Advocate for respondent No.2-BSES RPL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.17/2004, under Section 135 of The Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Jaffarpur Kalan, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 16th October, 2014 issued by respondent No.2-complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState accepts notice. Mr.Deepak, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and CRL.M.C. 5692/2014 Page 1 submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved between the parties and No...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India Vs. Lucknow Varanasi Tollways Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP No.190/2015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA PETITIONER Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meenakshi Sood and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. Versus LUCKNOW VARANASI TOLLWAYS PVT. LTD. .. RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chirag M. Shroff and Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocates. And OMP No.191/2015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA . PETITIONER Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meenakshi Sood and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. VERSUS LUCKNOW VARANASI TOLLWAYS PVT. LTD. ... RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chirag M. Shroff and Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2702.2015 IA No.4115 of 2015 (for exemption) in OMP No.190/2015 IA No.4118 of 2015 (for exemption) in OMP No.191/2015 1. The exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. OMP Nos.190 of 2015 & 191 of 2015 3. Both petitions arise out a c...
Tag this Judgment!