Delhi Court December 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Varun Capital Services Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
1. The present revision petition has been preferred by M/s.Varun Capital Services Ltd through its Managing Director, Rajneesh Gupta, assailing the judgment of acquittal dated 19.09.2012 passed by learned ACMM, East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. 2. The petitioner company is a public limited company which is in the business of sale and purchase of shares and commodities on behalf of their clients. The aforesaid company is registered with NSE (Capital Market and FandO Segment). 3. The respondent is a registered client of the petitioner company. The petitioner company had been transacting in sale and purchase of shares in FandO (Derivates Segment) on behalf of the respondent for quite some time. The case of the petitioner is that despite fall in prices in the market, the respondent repeatedly requested the company not to square uphis account and was asked to continue as well keep intact some of the transactions which were entered into. As a result of such instructions by the respondent, the ...
Bhupinder Kumar Vs. Radha Rani and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
Open Court: 1. The present second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2015 passed by the learned First Appellate Court in MCA 66/2006, whereby the said regular first appeal has been dismissed, and the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court, namely the learned Civil Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Shahdara in Suit No.175/2006 dated 03.11.2006 has been affirmed. 2. The appellant/ plaintiff filed the suit for partition and permanent injunction against the defendants by claiming himself to be the adopted son of late Sh. Murari Lal vide adoption deed dated 15.06.1975 - stated to have been executed by Sh. Murari Lal and his wife Smt. Shanti Devi before the village Panchayat. He claimed that since 15.06.1975, he was residing with Sh. Murari Lal at property No.B-1/4, Krishna Nagar, Delhi “ the suit property. He claimed that Sh. Murari Lal was first married to the mother of Sh.Virender Kumar, and after her death, he married Smt. Shanti Devi, who had no issues....
Telefonaktiebolaget L.M Ericsson Vs. Lava International Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
1. The plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendant seeking inter alia to restrain violation and infringement of its rights in its 8 patents along with damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. in the month of March, 2015. The defendant appeared before Court on the first date itself. Time to file the written statement was granted for four weeks on 26th March, 2015. 2. The written statement along with counter claim was filed by the defendant on 28th July, 2015. However, written statement to the counter claim was filed by the plaintiff on 5th December, 2015. In fact, a notice in the counter claim was issued by this Court vide order dated 31st July, 2015 and a period of 8 weeks was given to the plaintiff to file its written statement. From 31st August, 2015 till 29th October, 2015 both the parties were negotiating settlement, it is only on 3rd November, 2015 the plaintiff informed the Court that both the parties have not been able to resolve the matte...
Delhi Jal Board and Another Vs. M/s. Dev Raj Kataria and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
Oral: 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') is filed by the Delhi Jal Board/petitioner impugning the Award of the Arbitrator dated 10.5.2007, as modified by the Order dated 31.5.2007, whereby, an amount of Rs.13,63,984/- has been awarded in favour of the respondent no.1/Contractor and against the petitioner/objector. Respondent no.1 has also been awarded interest at 9% per annum simple w.e.f 20.8.2002 till realization. 2. The disputes between the parties arose out of a contract for construction of an outfall storm water drain for Tara Apartments, near Tuglakabad Extension and adjoining areas awarded to the respondent no.1 by the petitioner vide Letter of the petitioner dated 16.9.1996. The period of completion of the contract was to be 8 months from the date from which petitioner would ask the respondent no.1 to commence the work under the contract. Before commencement of work in terms of Clauses 11 and 24 ...
Helamin Technology Holding Sa and Another Vs. Haribansh Rai and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
1. By way of this order, I propose to decide the following four pending applications:- (a) I.A. No. 10720/2012 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiffs; (b) I.A. No. 19935/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC filed by the defendants for vacation of interim order; (c) I.A. No. 15400/2012 under Order VII Rule 10 and 11 CPC filed on behalf of the defendants for rejection of plaint; (d) I.A. No. 40/2013 under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed by the defendants. 2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off, damages, rendition of accounts and delivery up against the defendants. 3. Brief facts of the case as per the plaint are that the plaintiff No. 1 is a limited Company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland and is the world leader in development, production and marketing of specific scale corrosion inhibitors used in water-steam and heating circuits/steam generators, warm and hot water networks, boilers, turbines, cooling systems etc. Th...
Anil Kumar and Another Vs. Govt. of NCT Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
1. The petitioners, who are the parents in law of the complainant Vandana Jain, have challenged the order dated 09.01.2015 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Courts-02, Dwarka Courts, Delhi has refused to discharge them with respect to offence under Section 498A of the IPC in connection with FIR No.55/11 (P.S.Dabri). 2. The complainant Vandana Jain had lodged an FIR alleging that she got married to one Nitin Jain, son of the petitioners on 03.03.2009 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals at Delhi. At the time of marriage, tall claims were made by the accused persons regarding their financial strength and status in society but those claims were shortly found to be false. It was alleged that after the marriage, the accused persons insinuated the complainant of bringing insufficient dowry and she was asked to hand over all the personal jewellery. The husband of the complainant was working at Nigeria. The petitioner No.1 was alleged to have behaved in a strange fashio...
M/s. TRG Industries P Ltd. Vs. M/s. Machinery Parts Corporation and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
1. The present execution petition has been filed by the decree holder against the judgment-debtors for execution of judgment and decree dated 28th September, 2007 for principle amount of Rs.42,08,469/- along with interest on the principle amount @ 15% per annum w.e.f. 2nd March, 2002 till the date of payment. 2. After passing the judgment and decree, the judgment debtor challenged the same before the Division Bench by filing of an appeal being RFA (OS) No.1/2008. 3. While issuing notice in the appeal vide order dated 23rd January, 2008 the Division Bench directed the judgment debtor No.1 to deposit 50% of decreetal amount within four weeks from the date of the said order and stayed the operation of the judgment and decree till the next date i.e. 23rd April, 2008. 4. The judgment-debtor No. 1 did not deposit the 50% decreetal amount and on the next date i.e. 23rd April, 2008, the order dated 23rd January, 2008 was modified at the request of the judgment-debtor No. 1 that he be given pos...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Seva Ram and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2015
1. The appellant/insurance company has preferred this appeal against the award dated 07.05.2011 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Claim Petition No.391/2010 whereby the claimants have been awarded a total compensation of Rs.8,37,850/- with interest @ 8% per annum for the death of Sh.Joginder Kumar in the fatal accident. 2. The grievance of the appellant/insurance company agitated before this Court is restricted to grant of recovery rights. Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocate appearing on behalf of appellant/insurance company has drawn the attention of this Court to the fact that the driving licence issued to the driver Balram Singh, who is respondent no.7 before this Court, was only for driving light motor vehicles (LMV). On the date of accident, the driver Balram Singh was driving a Taxi, which is a commercial vehicle. The learned Tribunal failed to grant recovery rights to the insurance company despite the fact that the offending vehicle bearing registration No.HR-55-FT-90...
Adarsh Kumar Puniyani Vs. Lajwanti Piplani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2015
Open Court: 1. The present second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court, namely, ADJ-04 (NW), Rohini Courts, Delhi in RCA No.29/2015, whereby the first appeal preferred by the appellant/defendant has been dismissed, and the judgment and decree dated 27.03.2015 passed in Suit No.340/2014 under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC qua the relief of possession/ejectment has been affirmed. 2. The respondent filed the suit for, inter alia, claiming the relief of ejectment of the appellant/defendant on the premise that the plaintiff is a senior citizen and absolute owner of the property, i.e. upper ground floor, second and third floor of property no.B-80 (old plot no.74), Rishi Nagar, Rani Bagh, Shakur Basti, New Delhi. The plaintiff stated that she built up the entire building containing stilt parking and the three floors in collaboration with a builder in the year 2011. The plaintiff sold the ownership of the third floor in 2011 itself. She stated that in De...
The State Vs. Arif
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2015
R.K. Gauba, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by the result of the Sessions case No. 49/2011 arising out of report submitted under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on conclusion of investigation into FIR No. 130/2010 under Section 302 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of police station New Usmanpur, the State (Government of NCT of Delhi) has submitted this petition under Section 378 Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal. The challenge brought through the petition at hand is to the correctness of the judgment 16.02.2015 of the Additional Sessions Judge, North East, Delhi whereby the respondent herein was acquitted of the charge of he, along with three others (including a juvenile) in furtherance of their common intention, having committed the murder of one Ramesh Kumar @ Dada at about 7/7:15 PM on 21.04.2010 in the area of Yamuna Khadar in the vicinity of Khajuri red light within the jurisdiction of police station New Usmanpur. 2. The delay of 54 days in filing ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »