Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4768/2013 OM PARKASH AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Jitendera Sethi & Mr. Hemendra Jailiya, Advocates versus STATE AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with SI Vishwanath Mr. Akhil Batra, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.344/2009, under Sections 356/332/506/186/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Burari, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 8th November, 2013 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court, are complainants of the FIR in question and they have been identified to be so by their counsel as well as by SI Vishwanath, Investigating O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: + 28th January, 2015 CRL.A. 305/2014 SHYAM Through: ..... Appellant Ms Alpana Pandey, Adv. (DHCLSC) versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Lichhman, P.S. South Rohini. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Appellant Shyam impugns the judgment dated 27.02.2013 and order on sentence dated 28.02.2013 in case FIR No.61/2011, P.S. South Rohini vide which he was convicted for offence u/s 394 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 3 years and was also directed to pay fine of Rs.2000/-, in default to undergo SI for 3 months.2. Prosecution case lies in a narrow compass. On 22.03.2011, complainant Yudhvir Singh (PW3) was roaming near CAW Cell, Sector 3 Rohini along with his two nephews aged about 1 year and 5 years old. At about 07.20 p.m, two boys aged about 20-25 years started walking very closely near to his nephew Pra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 748/2014 Decided on :28. 01.2015 IN THE MATTER OF: M/S MINDA NEXGENTECH LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Chander Shekhar Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Narinder Kumar, Advocate versus TUSHAR KANTI GHOSH ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Bimal Chakrabarti, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit under Order XXXVII of the CPC, praying inter alia for a decree of a sum of `24,45,900.16, against the defendant, alongwith interest thereon.2. On 14.03.2014, summons were issued to the defendant in the prescribed format. As per the records, the defendant, who is a resident of Burdwan, West Bengal, was served with the summons in the suit on 16.06.2014. However, the defendant did not file the memo of appearance within the prescribed period of ten days. Instead, he filed a written statement on 08.07.2014. On 12.09.2014, when counsel for the defendant had appeared before the learned...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19.01.2015. Judgment delivered on :28.01.2015. CS(OS) 3510/2014 VIKRAM KAPUR & ORS Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Ravi Kishan Chandna, Mr. Shashank Khurana and Ms. Roopa Dayal, Mr.Ritesh Kumar and Ms.Honey Kumari, Advs. versus ATLAS CYCLES (HARYANA ) LTD & ORS Through ..... Defendants Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sudhir Makkar, Adv. for D-1 to D-6. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Adv. for D-8, D-9, D-11 to D-17. Mr. Amit Saxena, Adv. for D-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A. No.688/2015 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC) 1 This application is not pressed. 2 Disposed of accordingly. I.A. No.22804/2014 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the CPC) (i) Present suit has been filed by the plaintiffs (Vikram Kapur group) against the defendants of whom defendant No.1 is the company namely Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd. (ii) Defendants No.2 to 7 are the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 20, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 28, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6426/2000 KEASHAV SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Puneet Verma, Advocate versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, BSF & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated October 17, 1998 passed by the Summary Security Force Court (herein after referred as SSFC), the order dated November 20, 1998 passed by the DIG, BSF HQ, Gurdaspur confirming the same as well as the order dated September 24, 2000 passed by the DG, BSF rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner.2. The facts germane for adjudication of the present petition are that on January 09, 1996 while posted as L/Naik with the 122nd Bn. BSF at Barmer, a complaint was made against the petit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 19, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 28, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4586/2005 SATYAWAN SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate versus UOI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Desodya, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated February 21, 2004 passed by the Commandant BSF whereby he was ordered to be dismissed from service and subsequent orders dated May 14, 2004 passed by IG, BSF and dated 3rd/4th January, 2005 passed by the Director General, BSF respectively rejecting the appeal and the revision petition filed by the petitioner and thereby upholding the order of dismissal.2. The facts are not in dispute. The petitioner joined BSF as Water Carrier in August 1990. He was appointed as a Constable (GD) in the year 1995. The petitioner proceed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 206 of 2013 Reserved on:8. h January 2015 Decided on:28. h January 2015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Ayushi Kiran, Advocate. Versus AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & AFCONS PAULING (INDIA) LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manu Seshadri, Mr. Tanmay Nand, Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGEMENT2801.2015 1. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is aggrieved by the Arbitral Award dated 31st October 2012 and a subsequent order dated 16th December 2012 of the Arbitral Tribunal ('AT') allowing the claim of the Respondent Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. ('Claimant') and directing the NHAI (Employer) to pay the Claimant a sum of Rs.1,91,53,304 deducted from the Interim Payment Certificates (IPCs) towards increase in royalty charges on rock, sand and murum along with simple interest at a rate of 12% per annum (pa) from the respective dates of de...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:21. t January, 2015 Judgment Delivered on:28. h January, 2015 % + FAO(OS) 34/2015 SEEMA SWAMI ....Appellant versus IHHR HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants: Mr Anupam Srivastava with Mr Tarun Bansal and Ms Sharmishtha Ghosh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr Vineet Jhanji and Mr Imran Moulaey, Advocates. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The Appellant (Defendant No.1 in the Suit) has impugned the order dated 24.11.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in IA No.9467/2012 under Order XXXVIII read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the Respondent (Plaintiff in =============================================================== the Suit) whereby the Appellant has been restrained from recovering/receiving the monthly rent and the maintenance charges from the tenant with re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 28, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6534/2014 DHARAMBIR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Manish Mohan, Advocate with Ms.Suparna Srivastava and Mr.Kumar Harsh, Advocates for R-1 and R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner prays to the Court that the orders dated July 08, 2014 and July 19, 2014, declaring him to be an absconder be quashed. He be permitted to resumed duties. All punishments levied upon him in the past be declared illegal and hence quashed. Consequential benefits including back wages be directed to be paid.2. Relevant facts to be noted would be that the petitioner was enrolled as a Constable (GD) in the Border Security Force on April 01, 1988 and at different points of time was attached to the different battalions of the Border Secu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6423/2013 & CM No.14005/2013 NATIONAL FRONT OF INDIAN TRADE UNIONS (DHN) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr A.K. Bajpai & Mr Praveen Gupta, Advs. versus % UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr M.K. Chaudhary, Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER2801.2015 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner/union is, essentially, aggrieved by the fact that the Standing Committee has taken a decision to decline its claim for verification and consequent recognition as a central trade union, based on reasons, which according to the petitioner, are unsustainable. 1.1 It is in this connection, that the petitioner/union has impugned the minutes of meeting of the Standing Committee dated 21.06.2013 and 22.07.2013, and the letter of the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (C) dated 26.08.2013.2. Briefly, the broad facts as culled from ...
Tag this Judgment!