Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. M/S Oceanic Solvent Industries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: January 28, 2015 + O.M.P. 681/2009 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vishnu Mehra, Advocate versus M/S OCEANIC SOLVENT INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Virender Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) O.M.P. 681/2009 and IAs 14944/2009, 14945/2009 & 20889/2014 The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act for short) lay a challenge to arbitral award dated May 04, 2009 of the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The petition was filed on September 02, 2009 with an application bearing IA No.14943/2009, seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the award. When the matter was listed on May 28, 2010, the learned Joint Registrar has on the application bearing IA No.14943/2009 after recording the consent of the counsel for the respondent granted four weeks time to the petitioner to file the original award dated May 04, 2009....
Meenu and Ors. Vs. Integrated District Health Society and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9371/2014 & conn. matters 28th January, 2015 % 1. W.P.(C) No.9371/2014 and C.M. No.21189/2014 MEENU AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate with Ms. Aastha Chopra, Advocate. versus INTEGRATED DISTRICT HEALTH SOCIETY AND ORS. .... Respondents Through:2. Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.4. W.P.(C) No.9374/2014 and C.M. No.21193/2014 ANITA NEGI AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate with Ms. Aastha Chopra, Advocate. versus INTEGRATED DISTRICT HEALTH SOCIETY AND ORS. .... Respondents Through: W.P.(C) No.9371/2014 & conn. matters Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.4. Page 1 of 24 3. W.P.(C) No.9375/2014 and C.M. No.21194/2014 SUMIT KAUSHIK AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate with Ms. Aastha Chopra, Advocate. versus INTEGRATED DISTRIC...
Bhushan Kumar Vs. The Director of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % + W.P.(C) No.7056/2014 & conn. 28th January, 2015 W.P.(C) No.7056/2014 BHUSHAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advs. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Mr. Atul Jain, Adv. for R-3. + W.P.(C) No.6840/2014 ANJULI HANDA ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advs. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Mr. Atul Jain, Adv. for R-3. + W.P.(C) No.6843/2014 ANITA NAG ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advs. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Mr. Atul Jain, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.7056/2014 1. These writ p...
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Shahida and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
$- 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 325/2013 U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad with Ms. Salonee Agarwal, Advocates. versus SHAHIDA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Doval with Mr. Ashish Kumar & Ms. Anjana Sirohi, Advocates for R-1 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 7.01.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.12,61,570/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 to 6 for the death of Shaukat Ali who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 28.5.2010.2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was pleaded that deceased Shaukat Ali was supplying milk and earning Rs.10,000/- per month. The Claims Tribunal in the absence of any evidence with regard to the business carried on by the deceased, took the minimum wage...
Uday Kumar Sinha Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. A. No.245/2011 Reserved on 20th January, 2015 Decided on 28th January, 2015 UDAY KUMAR SINHA Through ..... Appellant :Mr. S.B.S. Vashishtha, Adv. Versus STATE Through ..... Respondent : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.1. Aggrieved by his conviction under Sections 394/397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 appellant has preferred this appeal.2. Prosecution case, as set out in the charge-sheet, is that on 10th November, 2005, an information was received in the Police Station Tilak Nagar at about 4:45 PM that two/three persons, armed with revolver, had come to the premises bearing No.5-B/17, Meenakshi Garden, Delhi, pursuant whereof DD No.13-A was recorded and handed over to Sub Inspector D.P. Kajla for enquiry, who along with Constable Devender reached the spot and recorded statement of Bhupinder Kumar, (Ex.PW3/A) wherein he stated that he was employed ...
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Preeti and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
$- 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1145/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani with Mr. Manish Kaushik, Advocates. versus PREETI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The sole ground of challenge raised in the instant appeal at the time of hearing is that the Claims Tribunal erred in making addition of 30% towards future prospects.2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, in absence of any evidence that the deceased was earning Rs. 20,000/- per month as claimed, the Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased to be Rs. 8008/- per month as per the minimum wages and made an addition of 30% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd towards personal living expenses and applied a multiplier of 17 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs. 14,15,964/-.3. Learned counsel for Respondents No.1 to 5, on the ot...
Arvind Kaushik and Ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1172/2013 ARVIND KAUSHIK & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Bharat Dube, Ms. Meenakshi & Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.57/2009, under Sections 419/385/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Crime Branch, Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding, which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice submits that petitioner No.7, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so by Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, Investigating Officer of this case. Crl.M.C.No.1172/2013 Page 1 Petitioner No.7, presen...
Mohd Sohail and Ors. Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 28, 2015 (i) + CRL.M.C. 4687/2014 MOHD SOHAIL & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Shantanu Rastogi, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with Inspector Rajender Respondents No.1 to 6 in person (ii) + CRL.M.C. 4072/2014 MOHD SULEMAN @ SALMAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Shantanu Rastogi, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with SI Usman Ali Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Crl.M.C.No.4687/2014 Crl.M.C.No.4072/2014 Page 1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.188/2014, under Sections 427/323/452/34 of the IPC [in Crl. M.C. No.4687/2014]. & FIR No.189/2014, under Sections 323/324/506/34 of the IPC ...
Mohd Saffique and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 319/2015 & Crl.M.A. 1232/2015 MOHD SAFFIQUE & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajendra Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates versus STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Kali Charan Mr. Chander M. Maini, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.186/2010, under Sections 380/411/34 of IPC registered at police station Saraswati Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr.Chander M. Maini, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant CRL.M.C. 319/2015 Page 1 of the FIR in question and he has be...
Sombir Dagar and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 28, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 314/2015 SOMBIR DAGAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Nusrat Hossain, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Naveen Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Adith Lily Respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 315/2015 & Crl.M.A. 1225/2015 SOMBIR DAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nusrat Hossain, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Naveen Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Rajeev Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of two FIRs i.e. FIR CRL.M.C. 314 & 315 of 2015 Page 1 No.412/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Vasant Vihar, Delhi [in Crl.M.C.314/2015]. and FIR No.601/2014 under Sections 323/328/506 of IPC registered ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »