Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Keashav Singh Vs. Director General, Bsf and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 20, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 28, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6426/2000 KEASHAV SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Puneet Verma, Advocate versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, BSF & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated October 17, 1998 passed by the Summary Security Force Court (herein after referred as SSFC), the order dated November 20, 1998 passed by the DIG, BSF HQ, Gurdaspur confirming the same as well as the order dated September 24, 2000 passed by the DG, BSF rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner.2. The facts germane for adjudication of the present petition are that on January 09, 1996 while posted as L/Naik with the 122nd Bn. BSF at Barmer, a complaint was made against the petit...
Satyawan Singh Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 19, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 28, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4586/2005 SATYAWAN SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate versus UOI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Desodya, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated February 21, 2004 passed by the Commandant BSF whereby he was ordered to be dismissed from service and subsequent orders dated May 14, 2004 passed by IG, BSF and dated 3rd/4th January, 2005 passed by the Director General, BSF respectively rejecting the appeal and the revision petition filed by the petitioner and thereby upholding the order of dismissal.2. The facts are not in dispute. The petitioner joined BSF as Water Carrier in August 1990. He was appointed as a Constable (GD) in the year 1995. The petitioner proceed...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 206 of 2013 Reserved on:8. h January 2015 Decided on:28. h January 2015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Ayushi Kiran, Advocate. Versus AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & AFCONS PAULING (INDIA) LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manu Seshadri, Mr. Tanmay Nand, Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGEMENT2801.2015 1. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is aggrieved by the Arbitral Award dated 31st October 2012 and a subsequent order dated 16th December 2012 of the Arbitral Tribunal ('AT') allowing the claim of the Respondent Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. ('Claimant') and directing the NHAI (Employer) to pay the Claimant a sum of Rs.1,91,53,304 deducted from the Interim Payment Certificates (IPCs) towards increase in royalty charges on rock, sand and murum along with simple interest at a rate of 12% per annum (pa) from the respective dates of de...
Inderjit Narula Vs. Rohit Dua and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
$ 4-6&8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:28. 01.2015 CRL.L.P. 540/2014, CRL.L.P. 541/2014 & CRL.L.P. 542/2014 INDERJIT NARULA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Abinesh K. Mishra and Mr. S.S. Mishra, Advocates versus ROHIT DUA & ANR Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate CRL.L.P. 576/2014 ASHU CHANANA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Abinesh K. Mishra and Mr. S.S. Mishra, Advocates versus ROHIT DUA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The aforesaid leave petitions have been preferred to assail the similar judgments rendered by Sh. Gajender Singh Nagar, MM-01 (Central), Karkardooma Courts (East), Delhi in four complaint cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act). The details of the complaint cases are as follows:2. Crl LP No.Complaint No.540/2014 5789/2010 541/2014 6617/2010 542/2014 5411/2010 576/2014 7128/2010 Cheque No., Dated & Ba...
Ashu Chanana Vs. Rohit Dua and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
$ 4-6&8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:28. 01.2015 CRL.L.P. 540/2014, CRL.L.P. 541/2014 & CRL.L.P. 542/2014 INDERJIT NARULA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Abinesh K. Mishra and Mr. S.S. Mishra, Advocates versus ROHIT DUA & ANR Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate CRL.L.P. 576/2014 ASHU CHANANA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Abinesh K. Mishra and Mr. S.S. Mishra, Advocates versus ROHIT DUA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The aforesaid leave petitions have been preferred to assail the similar judgments rendered by Sh. Gajender Singh Nagar, MM-01 (Central), Karkardooma Courts (East), Delhi in four complaint cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act). The details of the complaint cases are as follows:2. Crl LP No.Complaint No.540/2014 5789/2010 541/2014 6617/2010 542/2014 5411/2010 576/2014 7128/2010 Cheque No., Dated & Ba...
Seema Swami Vs. Ihhr Hospitality Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:21. t January, 2015 Judgment Delivered on:28. h January, 2015 % + FAO(OS) 34/2015 SEEMA SWAMI ....Appellant versus IHHR HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants: Mr Anupam Srivastava with Mr Tarun Bansal and Ms Sharmishtha Ghosh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr Vineet Jhanji and Mr Imran Moulaey, Advocates. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The Appellant (Defendant No.1 in the Suit) has impugned the order dated 24.11.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in IA No.9467/2012 under Order XXXVIII read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the Respondent (Plaintiff in =============================================================== the Suit) whereby the Appellant has been restrained from recovering/receiving the monthly rent and the maintenance charges from the tenant with re...
Jagpreet Kaur Gandhi Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7906/2013 Reserved on :03. 12.2014 Pronounced on :28. 01.2015 IN THE MATTER OF: JAGPREET KAUR GANDHI ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through :Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for R-3 & 4. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 9.11.2013 and letter dated 21.11.2013 issued to the respondent No.3/Company, terminating her services to the post of Assistant Manager-BD w.e.f. 9.11.2013, on business grounds and informing her that the amounts due and payable to her had been transferred to her account towards full and final settlement. The petitioner also prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to reinstate her with all the consequential benefits and consider her case for regularization in terms of the Resolution dated 3.9.2013, passed by the Board of Directors of the respondent No.3/Company. La...
Dharambir Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 28, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6534/2014 DHARAMBIR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Manish Mohan, Advocate with Ms.Suparna Srivastava and Mr.Kumar Harsh, Advocates for R-1 and R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner prays to the Court that the orders dated July 08, 2014 and July 19, 2014, declaring him to be an absconder be quashed. He be permitted to resumed duties. All punishments levied upon him in the past be declared illegal and hence quashed. Consequential benefits including back wages be directed to be paid.2. Relevant facts to be noted would be that the petitioner was enrolled as a Constable (GD) in the Border Security Force on April 01, 1988 and at different points of time was attached to the different battalions of the Border Secu...
Vikram Kapur and Ors Vs. Atlas Cycles (Haryana ) Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19.01.2015. Judgment delivered on :28.01.2015. CS(OS) 3510/2014 VIKRAM KAPUR & ORS Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Ravi Kishan Chandna, Mr. Shashank Khurana and Ms. Roopa Dayal, Mr.Ritesh Kumar and Ms.Honey Kumari, Advs. versus ATLAS CYCLES (HARYANA ) LTD & ORS Through ..... Defendants Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sudhir Makkar, Adv. for D-1 to D-6. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Adv. for D-8, D-9, D-11 to D-17. Mr. Amit Saxena, Adv. for D-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A. No.688/2015 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC) 1 This application is not pressed. 2 Disposed of accordingly. I.A. No.22804/2014 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the CPC) (i) Present suit has been filed by the plaintiffs (Vikram Kapur group) against the defendants of whom defendant No.1 is the company namely Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd. (ii) Defendants No.2 to 7 are the d...
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sh. Shyam Sunder and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2015
$-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 89/2015 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Advocate versus SH. SHYAM SUNDER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against judgment dated 18.09.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.21,43,800/- was granted in favour of Respondents no.1 to 6 for the death of Smt. Sarla Rani, a home maker, who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 06.04.2013.2. It urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the Claims Tribunal erred in granting addition towards future prospects. It is further stated that the compensation awarded towards loss of love and affection and loss of consortium is on the higher side.3. The appeal is devoid of any merit in view of the fact that no addition at all has ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »