Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr M.C Gupta Vs. Ramesh Chandra Gupta and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
$~A-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:06. 01.2015 CS(OS) 789/2013 DR M.C GUPTA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.A.K.Aggarwal and Ms.Surabhi Aggarwal, Advocates. versus RAMESH CHANDRA GUPTA & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Varun Sharma, Advocate for D-1, 2 & 4 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL IA No.9995/2014 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6, Order 1 Rule 10(2), Order 6 Rule 16 of the CPC for deletion of defendants No.4 to 7 from the array of defendants and for striking out their written statement.2. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit relating to partition of the property 3C/14, New Rohtak Road, New Delhi. The plaintiff seeks decree of partition by metes and bounds in respect of the suit property and that his share be given to him. As per the plaint the property belonged to the late father of the plaintiff Shri Ram Chandra Gupta. The suit property was part of the property of HUF c...
Union of India Vs. Raj Rani and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.Appeal Nos.02/2015, 03/2015 & 04/2015 Decided on :6. h January, 2015 + LA.APP. 2/2015 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus AMAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondent Through + LA.APP. 3/2015 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus SHIVALIK DAIRY (P) LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through + LA.APP. 4/2015 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus RAJ RANI & ANR Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) LA Appeal No.2/2015 CM No.77/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 275 days in filing the appeal) CM No.78/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 174 days in re-filing the appeal) LA Appeal No.3/2015 CM No.80/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 312 days in filing the appeal) CM No.81/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 178 days in re-filing the appeal...
Sh. Ajay Bajpai Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LA.Appeal No.293/2014 Decided on :6. h January, 2015 SH. AJAY BAJPAI Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Chander Jeet Yadav & Ms. Priyanka Yadav, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for R-1/LAC (L&B). Mr. D.P. Kaushik, Advocate for DDA/R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.9845/2014 (condonation of delay) 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 2190 days in filing of this appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment of the reference court dated 19.05.2008 by virtue of which the reference of the appellant for enhancement of compensation has been answered against the appellant.2. The only facts pleaded for seeking condonation of delay as stated in para Nos.1 to 5 of the application read as under:-1. That the appellant is not a resident ...
Union of India Vs. Amar Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.Appeal Nos.02/2015, 03/2015 & 04/2015 Decided on :6. h January, 2015 + LA.APP. 2/2015 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus AMAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondent Through + LA.APP. 3/2015 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus SHIVALIK DAIRY (P) LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through + LA.APP. 4/2015 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus RAJ RANI & ANR Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) LA Appeal No.2/2015 CM No.77/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 275 days in filing the appeal) CM No.78/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 174 days in re-filing the appeal) LA Appeal No.3/2015 CM No.80/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 312 days in filing the appeal) CM No.81/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 178 days in re-filing the appeal...
Union of India Vs. Shivalik Dairy (P) Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.Appeal Nos.02/2015, 03/2015 & 04/2015 Decided on :6. h January, 2015 + LA.APP. 2/2015 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus AMAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondent Through + LA.APP. 3/2015 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus SHIVALIK DAIRY (P) LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through + LA.APP. 4/2015 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. versus RAJ RANI & ANR Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) LA Appeal No.2/2015 CM No.77/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 275 days in filing the appeal) CM No.78/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 174 days in re-filing the appeal) LA Appeal No.3/2015 CM No.80/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 312 days in filing the appeal) CM No.81/2015 (For Condonation of Delay of 178 days in re-filing the appeal) LA Appeal No.4/2015 CM No...
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Jawahar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing & Order: January 06, 2015. + W.P.(C) 5/2015 & CM APPL. No.15/2015 (stay) & CM APP162015 (exemption) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .... Petitioners Ms. Prabha Sharma, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Hilal Haider, Sr. Gov. Counsel versus JAWAHAR SINGH Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate W.P.(C) 10/2015 & CM APPL. No.23/2015 (stay) CM No.24/2015 (exemption) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .... Petitioners Ms. Prabha Sharma, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Hilal Haider, Sr. Gov. Counsel versus JAWAHAR SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CAVEAT Nos.2 & 3/2015 Since the respondent is represented through a counsel, therefore, the caveats stand discharged. CM APPL No.16/2015 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 5/2015 CM APPL No.24/2015 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 10/2015 Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications...
Mc-Rotem-Melco Consortium and Ors. Vs. M/S Delhi Metro Rail Corporatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
$~R-8. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:02. 07.2014 % + Judgment delivered on:05. 01.2015 O.M.P. 304/2007 MC-ROTEM-MELCO CONSORTIUM & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Anuj Berry, Mr.Malak Bhatt, Mr. Manu Nair & Mr. Sagar Suri, Advocates. versus M/S DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Mr Rakesh Agarwal & Mr. Pulkit Agarwal, Advocates along with Mr.A.S. Rao, Law Officer, DMRC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGEMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred to assail the interim/ partial award dated 04.04.2007 passed by a three member arbitral tribunal. The dispute between the parties arose out of the differences pertaining to the quantum of deduction that could be made from the fixed lump sum price of the project, on account of exemption from...
M/S Jawahar Chit (P) Ltd. Vs. Ritika Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
$-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:05. 01.2015 % CRL.L.P. 6/2015 & CRL MA712015 M/S JAWAHAR CHIT (P) LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Chauhan, Advocate versus RITIKA CHAUDHARY ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The applicant has moved this application under Section 378(4) Cr PC for grant of leave/permission to file criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 20.09.2014 passed by Sh. Anurag Thakur, MM, Dwarka Court in Case No.392/2012 (Old CC No.23524/11 dated 08.03.2011 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act). By the impugned order, the complaint preferred by the applicant has been rejected and the respondent/accused was acquitted.2. The case of the complainant was that it is a Chit Fund company and that the accused was a member of the chit bearing No.JCH VI having total value of 2 lacs, of 25 instalments. It was alleged that the accused had only paid 9 instalments a...
University of Delhi Vs. Rattan Mala Ahuja and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.50 /2015 Date of decision:05. h January, 2015 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.K. Pathak, Advocate Versus RATTAN MALA AHUJA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for R-2,3, 5 & 6. Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan Singh, Adv. for R-4/UGC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) CM852015(exemption) The exemption application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.50 /2015 1. By way of this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 31.03.2014 passed by learned Appellate Authority and order dated 11.04.2013 passed by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Advocate enters appearance on advance notice on behalf of respondents No.2,3,5 & 6. Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan S...
Raju Chaudhary Vs. The Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 05, 2015 + W.P.(C) 45/2015 RAJU CHAUDHARY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.P.N.Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Advocate with Mr.Shyam Sunder, Advocate and Mr.B.K.Rout, Pairvi Officer, CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) CM No.76/2015 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. WP(C) 45/2015 1. Learned counsel for the respondents who appears on advance copy being served has produced the service record of the writ petitioner. The same has been perused by us.2. The petitioner was enrolled, on probation, as a Constable (GD) in CRPF. Exercising power under Rule 5 of the CCS (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, the petitioner has been discharged from service. The order in question is non-stigmatic. It does not contain any reasons which could be said to be casti...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »