Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahavir Prasad Vs. Devinder Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.272/2012 & CM110072012 (STAY) Decided on:30. h January, 2015 % MAHAVIR PRASAD Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Adv. versus DEVINDER KUMAR SHARMA Through ..... Respondent Ms. Rajani Chauhan and Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 16th January, 2012 thereby leave to defend was declined to the petitioner in an eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the DRC Act).2. In the eviction petition filed by the respondent it was only stated that the respondent was the owner/landlord of one shop forming part of property No.371, ground floor, Naya Bans, Khari Baoli, Delhi-110066 shown red in the site plan and that he needs the same for running a clinic by his elder daughter who had completed P.G. Diploma in Dietetics and Public Health Nutrition (DDPHN) from Delhi...
Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs. National Council for Teacher Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.932/2015 30th January, 2015 % RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari and Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, Advs. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Behera, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Nitya Sharma, Ms. Nidhi Raman and Ms. Nikita Khetrapal, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Sandeep S. Duggal, Mr. Yogesh Saini for Mr. V.K.Tandon, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner impugns the order dated 22.1.2015 whereby the petitioner has been relieved of his duties from National Council for Teacher Education/respondent no.1, and which is the deputationist employer, and the petitioner has thereby been asked to report to his parent department. Petitioner seeks the relief of continuatio...
M.C. Goyal Vs. Sardar Mehar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:30. h January, 2015 % + RC. REV. NO.575/2012 M.C. GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Gandhi, Adv. and Mr. Shivanshu Kumar, Advs. versus SARDAR MEHAR SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr. Purushotam Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) read with Sections 115 and 151 CPC has assailed the eviction order dated 5th September, 2012 passed by Additional Rent Controller, North-West, Rohini, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioner in respect of shops No.1 and 2, ground floor of property bearing No.1542, Tri Nagar, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted shops). It was the case of the respondent that the petitioner was inducted as tenant on 18th Octo...
Revolution Clothings Pvt Ltd and Ors Vs. Icici Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:30. h January, 2015 % + Crl. M.C. No.5145/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.17582/2014 REVOLUTION CLOTHINGS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Puneet Bajaj, Adv. with Mr.Amit Bajaj, Adv. versus ICICI BANK Through ..... Respondent Mr.Punit K. Bhalla, Adv. with Ms.Chetna Bhalla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Due to dishonour of cheque, the respondent filed a complaint against the petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complaint was taken up by the Metropolitan Magistrate. Thereafter, the notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. was served upon the petitioners on 16th January, 2010. The evidence was led by the respondent/complainant and examined PW1 Mr.Abhishek Aggarwal who was partially cross-examined on 17th April, 2010 and 22nd May, 2010. Thereafter, the said Court was presided over by another Metropolitan Magistrate and the remaining cross-examination of PW-1 was con...
Ram Gopal Vs. Ram Charan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
$~A-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:15. 01.2015 Judgment pronounced on:30. 01.2015 + CS(OS) 737/1984 RAM GOPAL versus RAM CHARAN ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Samar Bansal and Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra Advs ..... Defendant Through Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr Adv. with Sandeep Mital, Ms. Rupali Kapoor and Mr. Mridul Yadav Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA.No.13663/2013 (for rectification of decree dated 14.02.2008 by defendant No.1) 1. This is an application filed by defendant No.1 under Sections 151, 152 and 153 of CPC for rectification/modification of order dated 14.02.2008.2. A brief narration of background facts is necessary. This litigation is one of the various family litigations that were pending within the family of late Sh. Ganeshi Lal and Smt.Kasturi Devi. Sh. Ram Gopal, the plaintiff and Sh.Ram Charan, defendant No.1 are the two sons of late Sh. Ganeshi Lal and Smt. Kasturi. In 1962 the plaintiff, defendant No.1 and their father ...
Vandana Kumari and Anr Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h January, 2015 + CRL.A. 1451/2012 VANDANA KUMARI AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena APP along with SI Varun Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 6th October, 2012 in Sessions Case No.67/2011 arising out of FIR No.283/10 u/s 317/304/120B IPC whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC r/w Section 120 B IPC, u/s 317 IPC r/w Section 120B IPC and 120 B IPC and order on sentence dated 24th November, 2012, whereby they were sentenced to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/- each, in default three months SI u/s 304 Part I IPC r/w Section 120 B IPC, 5 years RI u/s 317 IPC r/w 120B IPC and 7 years RI and fine of Rs.5,000/- each u/s 120B IPC in default three months SI, the present appeal has been preferred.2. At the ou...
Kanwar Pal Vs. Shakuntala and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:14. h January, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:29. h January, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 345/2006 KANWAR PAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Priyanka Aggarwal & Ms. Mandakini Singh, Advs. versus SHAKUNTALA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Suresh Chandra, Adv. for R1R5 Mr. P.K.Mishra, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. As the State has not preferred any appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as trial court) dated 19.11.2005 vide which the respondents no.1 to 5 have been acquitted in FIR No.281/2001, PS Geeta Colony, aggrieved by the same, Kanwar Pal, father of the deceased (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) filed the present revision petition to set aside the same and to punish the respondents no.1 to 5.2. Factual matrix, as emerges from the record, is that the daughter of the petitioner, namely,...
Times Internet Ltd. Vs. Time Broadband Services Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : November 10, 2014 DECIDED ON : January 29 , 2015 + CS(OS) 2004/2006 & IA Nos.2620/2007 (u/O6R17 & 11806/2006 (u/O39R1&2) TIMES INTERNET LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Abhinav Hansaria, Advocate. versus TIME BROADBAND SERVICES PVT.LTD. ..... Defendant Through : None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The instant suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off/infringement of trademark, domain name, copyright and damages has been preferred by the plaintiff against the defendant. It is averred that the plaintiff M/s Times Internet Ltd. (hereinafter referred to TIL) is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. M/s Bennett Coleman & Co.Ltd. (hereinafter referred to BCCL) is its promoter company. BCCL entered the field of e-commerce about a decade back, under the Trade Name/Logo indiatimes and a portal indiatimes.com was created. Its internet site/website http://www.indiatimes.com was registered as ...
M/S. Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. Suman Lata Tuteja and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2015
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 2113/2000 % Date of Decision : January 29, 2015 M/S. HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Syed Shahid Hussain Rizvi, Adv. Versus SUMAN LATA TUTEJA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.K.Venkatraman, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.18661/2014 1. This application is moved by respondent/workman for release of money lying with the Registry. As per the letter of the Registry of this Court dated 17.07.2014, the money is lying in fixed deposit. This amount is calculated by the Registry as Rs.81,785.05.2. The sole question for consideration before this Court in the present application is whose money is it which is lying with the Registry.3. The brief history of the case shows that by way of this writ petition the petitioner Management has challenged the order of the Industrial Tribunal by which the Industrial Tribunal had set aside the termination of respondent No.1 workman and ord...
R.P.Dhiman Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd. (Ndpl) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.1170/2000 29th January, 2015 R.P.DHIMAN ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. (NDPL) & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vikram Nandrajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Adv. for R/NDPL. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner who was the employee of respondent no.1/Delhi Vidyut Board (now Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited) impugning the enquiry officers report dated 28.4.1997 and the consequential penalty order imposed by the disciplinary authority dated 18.9.1998 of the petitioner being visited with penalty of reduction by three stages in the present scale of pay for a period of three years with cumulative effect and during which period the petitioner was not to earn any increment and the petitioners future increments were to be ac...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »