Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Symed Labs Ltd. Vs. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:19. h January, 2015 + CS (OS) No.678/ 2013 SYMED LABS LTD. Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms. Shwetasree Majumdar, Advocate with Mr. Prithvi Singh, Advocate and Mr. Rajeshwar, Advocate versus GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rajeev K. Virmani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rajeshwari H., Advocate, Mr. S. Hariharan, Advocate, Mr. Tahir Abdul Tabbur, Advocate, Ms. Anindita Mitra, Advocate and Ms. Aparna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL I.A. No.5908/ 2013 (Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) and I.A. No.5417/ 2013 (Order VII Rules 10 and 11 CPC) in CS (OS) No.678/ 2013 1. By virtue of this application, the Plaintiff seeks an ad interim injunction restraining the Defendants, their agents, etc. from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising or directly or indirectly dealing in the product Linezolid manufactured in a manner so as to result in infringement of the Plaintiffs registered pate...
Lalit Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
$~72 & 73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h January, 2014 + CRL.M.C. 1160/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.3905/2014 LALIT KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Rai Sharma, Advocate alongwith Petitioners-in-person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State + CRL.M.C. 1556/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.5288/2014 RAJA RAM INDORIA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Kumar & Mr. Ujjwal Kumar, Advocates alongwith Petitioners-in-person versus LALIT KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) With the consent of both the parties, these two petitions are taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common order as the parties are same and both the petitions pertain Crl.M.C.No.1160 & 1556 of 2014 Page 1 to one incident. Subject matter of above-captioned two petitions is t...
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Madan Lal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. January, 2015 + MAC.APP.1184/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik, proxy counsel for Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Adv. versus MADAN LAL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Nagender Deswal, Adv. for R-1 & R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Shriram General Insurance Company Limited impugned the judgment dated 12.07.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs.8,38,752/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 and 2.2. There is twin challenge to the impugned judgment. First, there was no negligence on the part of Respondent no.3, driver of the vehicle involved in the accident and second, deceased Tarun Kumar was not in permanent employment. The Claims Tribunal erred in making an addition of 50% towards future prospects.3. Learned counsel for Respondents no.1 and 2 supports the im...
Virendra Yadav Vs. Central Public Information officer (Cpio)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 495/2015 VIRENDRA YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Divya Jyoti Jaipuriar, Adv. versus % CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (CPIO) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr Rajendra Sahu, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER1901.2015 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the Central Information Commission (in short CIC).2. Evidently vide an application filed under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (in short RTI Act), dated 21.01.2013, the petitioner, sought information with regard to Chairpersons of Indian Bank Association (IBA), who were appointed to the said organization since 01.01.2000. 2.1 The said RTI application was filed with the Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. This information was denied by the CPIO of the said department vide a response dated 25.02.2013. The basis for rejecting the RTI application, was t...
Chandan Vs. Dipti
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:19. h January 2015. + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 5/2015 CHANDAN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Mukti Singh and Mr. Sunil Kumar Sinha, Advocates versus DIPTI ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.977/2015 & 979/2015 (Exemptions) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.976/2015 (condonation of delay) By this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151, CPC, the appellant seeks condonation of delay of 35 days in filing the accompanying appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act. For the reason stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 35 days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. MAT. APP. (F.C.) No.5/2015 & C.M. Appl. No.978/2015 (Directions) 1. This is an appea...
Ashok Singh and Anr. Vs. Radhe Raman and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. January, 2015 + MAC.APP.63/2015 ASHOK SINGH AND ANR. Through: ...... Appellants Mr. Vikram Gujral, Adv. versus RADHE RAMAN AND ANR. Through: ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellants challenge the impugned the judgment dated 10.09.2114 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs.7,41,366/- was awarded in favour of the Appellants.2. The only ground of challenge raised in the instant appeal is with regard to the multiplier. The learned counsel for the Appellants relying on the judgment of this Court in Mohd. Hasnain & Ors. v. Jagram Meena & Ors., 2014 (142) DRJ303 argues that the multiplier has always been as per the age of the deceased. The age of the claimants is totally irrelevant.3. The law was discussed in great detail by me in Vijay Laxmi & Anr. v. Binod Kumar Yadav & Ors., ILR (2012) 6 DEL447 wherein in paras 4 to...
Alok Shrewala and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 4115/2003 and CM No.18141/2014 ALOK SHREWALA & ANR. .... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr Ajay Gulati, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. In CM No.18141/2014, we had issued notice. The notice had been accepted by the learned counsel for respondent No.2 to 4 as also by the learned counsel for respondent No.5. They had been directed to produce the file pertaining to the subject land for the purposes of ascertaining whether physical possession was ever taken and also as to whether compensation had been paid or not.2. It transpires now that the physical possession of the subject land could not be taken because of the operation of t...
Commissioner of Income Tax-Viii Vs. Ms. Kiran Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :19. 01.2015 + ITA NO.13/2015 + ITA NO.14/2015 + ITA NO.15/2015, C.M. APPL.157/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VIII versus ..... Appellant MS. KIRAN KAPOOR ..... Respondent Through : : Sh. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Angad Sandhu and Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocates for CIT. Sh. Mayank Nagi, Advocate, for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The questions of law which the revenue urges in support of these appeals, directed against three orders of the ITAT for AY200304, 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 are: (1) Whether the assessee is engaged in activity which can be termed manufacture so as to claim benefit of Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act) and ITA132015 TO152015 Page 1 (2) Whether the activity (of collection, collation, formatting of data and information and its export) fulfils the conditions stipula...
the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ms. Poonam and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
$-22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 515/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.A.K. Soni, Advocate versus MS. POONAM & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant impugns judgment dated 04.04.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.33,82,852/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 to 5 for the death of Shri Harbir Singh, who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 12.01.2011.2. The only ground of challenge made in the instant appeal is with regard to grant of future prospects. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the deceased was getting a fixed salary of Rs.14,500/- p.m. as per the evidence produced and thus, the Claims Tribunal was not justified in making an addition of 50% towards fu...
Babita Devi and Ors. Vs. Oriental Insurance Company
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
$-12 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 157/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Advocate versus BABITA DEVI & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. R.S. Roy, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 5. MAC.APP. 1017/2012 BABITA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. R.S. Roy, Advocate versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These are two appeals arising out of judgment dated 23.11.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.8,99,000/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 to 5 in MAC. APP. 157/2012 and Appellants in MAC.APP.1017/2012.2. For the sake of convenience, the Appellant in MAC.157/2012 shall be referred to as Insurance Company, whereas Respondents no.1 to 5 in MAC.APP. 1017/2012 shall be referred to as the clai...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »