Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Parmanand Advani Vs. Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: January 20, 2015 + OMP982015 M/S PARMANAND ADVANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Dhiraj Sachdeva, Adv. versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Udit Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) IA No.1282/2015 (u/S151CPC for condonation of delay in refilling the petition) In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in refilling the petition is condoned. IA stands disposed of. OMP982015 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act for short) lay a challenge to the award dated September 10, 2014 of the Arbitral Tribunal to the extent the Arbitral Tribunal has not granted the entire amount claimed under Claim No.1 and rejection of Claim Nos.2,3,4 & 6.2. The brief facts are, the respondent had invited tenders for the work of gauge conversion of Garhi Harsaru- Farukh Nagar Meter Gauge, Railway ...
Enjayes Spices and Chemical Oil Ltd. Vs. National Research Development ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 103 of 2013 ENJAYES SPICES & CHEMICAL OIL LTD. & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Ajit Pudussery, Ms. Shruti S. Hazarika and Ms. Sara Sundaram, Advocates. versus NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (NRDC) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Joydeep Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2001.2015 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an Award dated 29th September 2012 whereby the Petitioner has been asked to pay the Respondents a sum of Rs.4,16,13,361 together with interest @12% per annum from the date of the Award.2. Petitioner No.1 is Enjayes Spices & Chemical Oil Ltd. (ESCOIL) and Petitioner No.2 Mr. N.S. John. Respondent No.1 is the National Research Development Corporation (NRDC). The licence agreement 3. NRDC acquired from the Council for Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) the absolute ownershi...
All Grow and Investment P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :20. 01.2015 + ITA172015, C.M. APPL.159-160/2015 ALL GROW & INVESTMENT P. LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Vipul Dubey, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. Issue notice. Sh. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel accepts notice. With consent, the matter was heard on merits. In this appeal under Article 260A of the Income Tax Act by the assessee, the substantial question of law sought to be urged is with respect to the addition of `8.75 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer (AO) which had been upset by the CIT (Appeals) but directed to be restored by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).2. The brief facts for deciding the question are that the assessee is...
Dr. Rohit Chopra Vs. The Chairman, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3729/2013 20th January, 2015 % DR. ROHIT CHOPRA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. H.D.Sharma, Advocate VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN, MAULANA AZAD INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner, an employee of the respondent No.1/Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, seeking reliefs that he should be allowed to participate in the General Provident Fund (GPF) and the old pension scheme since 16.4.1999 when he was originally employed on ad hoc basis by the Government of NCT of Delhi/respondent No.3. The petitioner prays for quashing of the communication dated 22.2.2012 which has denied this relief claimed by the petitioner on the ground that...
Ramesh Chand Sharma Vs. State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :15.01.2015 Judgment delivered on :20.01.2015. TEST.CAS. 66/2011 & I.A.No.13456/2011 RAMESH CHAND SHARMA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.J.M.Kalia, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.V.C.Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1. Ms.Madhavi Khare, Advocate for R-2 to R-5. INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Present petition under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) seeks letters of administration of the assets of the deceased Rajesh Sharma. The petitioner before this Court is Ramesh Chand Sharma the son of the deceased. Deceased is stated to have left behind the following movable and immovable properties, details of which find herein as under: Immovable properties S.No.1 House property bearing no.C-243, Gali Rs.32,49,2000/no.12, New Usmanpur, Delhi-110053 2 House property bearing no.C-363, Gali Rs.21,74,200/NO.12, New Usmanpur, D?.elhi11053 3. House property...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Amresh Khassa and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h January, 2015 + MAC. APP. No.68/ 2015 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K. L. Nandwani, Adv. versus AMRESH KHASSA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) C.M. APPL. No.1110/ 2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. MAC. APP. No.68/ 2015 AND C.M. APPL. No.1109/ 2015 (stay) 1. The Appellant Shriram General Insurance Company Limited impugns the judgment dated 31.10.2014 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs. 26,77,320/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 and 2 for the death of Smt. Santosh, a graduate and a qualified JBT teacher.2. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the Claims Tribunal erred in relying upon the judgment of this Court in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limit...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kripa Shankar Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h January, 2015 + MAC. APP.660/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus KRIPA SHANKAR SHARMA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant impugns judgment dated 07.03.2012 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) and seeks recovery rights from the insured on the ground that there was conscious and willful breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy by the insured as proved by the Appellant Insurance Company and therefore, the Appellant was entitled to recover the compensation paid to Respondent no.1.2. The Claims Tribunal dealt with the question of liability in paras 64 to 71 of the impugned judgment, which are extracted hereunder:64. The case of insurance company is that it had served a notice under Order 12 Rule 8 of CPC upon owner and driver of the vehicle t...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Parosi Das @ Pardsi Das and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h January, 2015 + MAC. APP.386/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Thsrough: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus SMT. PAROSI DAS @ PARDSI DAS & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant impugns judgment dated 21.11.2011 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.7,91,384/- was awarded for the death of Ram Prasad, who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 08.08.2010 at about 9:30 p.m.2. The only ground of challenge raised by the Appellant Insurance Company is that the compensation awarded is exorbitant and excessive. It is stated that the deceased, as per the admission of the Respondents, was aged about 60 years, yet addition towards future prospects/inflation was given by the Claims Tribunal. It is stated that a perusal...
Manu Kumar and Anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: January 20, 2015 CS(OS) 1660/2001 MANU KUMAR AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. M. S. Vinaik, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY C+ ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sachit Setia, Adv. for d-2 to 4, 6 & 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) OA No.313/2014 1. This appeal is filed seeking to impugn the order dated 01.12.2014 passed by the Joint Registrar.2. The background facts which lead to filing of the appeal are that pursuant to the directions of the Joint Registrar the defendant No.1/appellant DDA filed an affidavit of Mr. S. K. Jain containing admission/denial of documents on 08.01.2013.3. On 26.07.2013, a statement was made before the Joint Registrar by the said Mr. S. K. Jain that certain documents of the plaintiffs have been admitted without comparing the same with the documents on record. Time was sought to file a fresh affidavit of admission/denial. Liberty was granted to file ...
M/S. Lanco Infratech Limited Vs. M/S. Hindustan Construction Company L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on January 13, 2015 Judgment delivered on January 19, 2015 + ARB. P. 11/2015 M/S. LANCO INFRATECH LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Dhruv Madan, Advocate versus M/S. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ananya Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. In this petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act in short), the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:(i) Allow the present application and confirm the appointment of Honble Mr. Justice R.C. Chopra (Retd.), Ld. Arbitrator on behalf of the petitioner to resolve the disputes between the parties; and/or (ii) Pass a direction for appointment of a Presiding Arbitrator to preside over the Arbitral Tribunal; and (iii) Pass a direction cancelling the appointment of Shri Amiya Kumar Mohanty, FIE by the Instit...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »