Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 20 2015

Vinod Kumar Vs. Somnath Sachdeva

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

$~A-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:12.01.2015 Judgement pronounced on:20.01.2015 + CS(OS) 2451/2013 VINOD KUMAR Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ashok Gurnami, Adv. Versus SOMNATH SACHDEVA Through ..... Defendant Mr. Prem B.Kshetri, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.19922/2013 1. This is an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit seeking a Decree of possession under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act in respect of second floor portion of property No.465/1, Jheel Khuranja, Delhi-110031 of a land measuring 75 sq.yds. Other reliefs are also sought.2. By the present application an ad interim injunction is sought to restrain the defendants from transferring, selling, parting with possession or creating third party interest in respect of the said second floor of the said property.3. The above application came up for hearing on 9.12.2013 when notice was issued to the defendant. Th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Punjab National Bank Vs. Arti Sharma and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h January, 2015 % + LPA No.27/2015 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK .. Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Shanker, Adv. Versus ARTI SHARMA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: None. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 28th October, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of allowing W.P.(C) No.7734/2011 filed by the three respondents, by directing the appellant Bank to defreeze the account of the respondents with the appellant Bank.2. It is the case of the appellant Bank in the memorandum of appeal: (i) that M/s Meditreat Pharmaceuticals, a partnership firm with Mr. Aman Sharma and Mr. Nagender Yadav as partners, had in or about March, 2010 availed of a Cash Credit Limit (CCL) from the appellant Bank; (ii) that the aforesaid Mr. Aman Sharma is the son of the respondents No.1&2 viz. Mrs. Arti Sharma and Mr. S.N. Sharma and the grandson of th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Greenpeace India Society Thr. Its Executive Direct Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5749/2014 GREENPEACE INDIA SOCIETY THR. ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjay Parikh & Ms Mamta Saxena, Advs. versus % UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Ms Kritika Mehra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER2001.2015 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution whereby the petitioner seeks following prayers:...(a) Direct the respondents to produce all the papers/ documents in the file maintained by them before this Honble Court and to set aside/ quash all the letters/ documents/ orders/ directions by which the crediting of amounts received by the petitioner as foreign contribution has been prohibited. (b) Direct that amount of Euros 235000 transferred on 23.06.2014 from St. Greenpeace Council be credited in the FCRA Account No.005103000000888 of the petitioner with IDBI Bank Ltd., Chennai... 1.1 Notice in this petition was iss...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Ct. (Mah.) Santosh Kumari Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 20, 2015 + W.P.(C) 3702/2014 CT. (MAH.) SANTOSH KUMARI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K.Tyagi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.B.S.Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Vinod Tiwari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the following orders:(i) Order of dismissal dated July 16, 2010. (ii) Order dated January 18, 2011 by the Appellate Authority. (iii) Order dated October 30, 2013 by the Revisional Authority dismissing her appeal and revision.2. As per the averments made in the petition the petitioner was enrolled as CT(Mah) in CRPF on July 10, 1992 and she had performed her duties with full devotion and dedication. She proceeded on casual leave for six days from May 04, 2009 to May 11, 2009 to arrange repayment of loan taken by her from ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Vinod Kashyap and Ors Vs. Cbi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:20. h January, 2015 % + Crl. M.C. No.4242/2014 VINOD KASHYAP & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Madhav Khurana, Mr.Abhimanyu Mahajan, Mr.Amrit Grewal and Ms.Manvi Priya, Advs. versus CBI Through ..... Respondent Mr.Narender Mann, SPP for CBI with Mr.Manoj Pant & Ms.Utkarsha Kohli, Advs. along with Insp. S.S.Yadav, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the order dated 4th September, 2014 passed by the Court of Special Judge CBI-05, Patiala House Courts, in the case titled as CBI v. S.K. Khanna & Ors., being RC No.2172011A0008/ACU-IV/CBI/New Delhi, under Sections 120B/420 IPC read with Sections 13(2) & 13(1)(D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, thereby summoning the petitioners.2. On 30th June, 2011, the CBI registered the above said RC against the petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Sarwan Singh Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:20. h January, 2015 % + Bail Appln. No.2102/2014 SARWAN SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.K.K.Manan, Adv. with Mr.Nipun Bhardwaj & Mr.Ankush Narang, Advs. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.Manoj Chaudhary, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in case FIR No.195/2013, under Sections 419/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, P.S. Economic Offences Wing. Notice was issued to the State on 22nd September, 2014. The status report has been filed where the case of the prosecution has been narrated on the basis of the FIR filed by the complainant. The relevant extracts of the complaint read as under:The complainant Sh. Kushal K. Rana has alleged that (1) Makhan Singh S/o Late Sh. Surjeet Singh (2) Smt. Mohinder Kaur W/o Late Sh. Sohan Singh (3) Swaran Singh S/...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Plus Corporate Ventures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Religare Finvest Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 627/2014 & IA No.25041 of 2014 (for stay) PRANIDHI COMMERCE PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Kamal Budhiraja and Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ruchin Midha, Advocate. With ARB.P. 628/2014 & IA No.25049 of 2014 (for stay) KALYANI BARTER PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Kamal Budhiraja and Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ruchin Midha, Advocate. With ARB.P. 629/2014 & IA No.25055 of 2014 (for stay) YUTHIKA COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Kamal Budhiraja and Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Marubhumi Dealers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Religare Finvest Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Kalyani Barter Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Religare Finvest Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2015

Abhinav Chaudhary and Ors. Vs. Delhi Technological University and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos.3512 /2014 & 3834/2014 20th January, 2015 % 1. W.P.(C) No.3512/2014 ABHINAV CHAUDHARY & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate. VERSUS DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate.2. W.P.(C) No.3834/2014 MEHA JOSHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. G. Joshi, Advocate. VERSUS DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.3512/2014 1. Five petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning the action of the respondent no.1/employer/Delhi Technological University of refusing to extend the contractual appointments of the petitioners and issuing a fresh advertisement for fresh appointment for contractual period for the posts in question. Petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.