Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ct/Gd Ramphal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 30, 2015 + W.P.(C) 885/2015 CT/GD RAMPHAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.N.L.Bareja, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Shiva Lakshmi, Advocate (CGSC) with Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey and Mr.Rahul Chouhan, Advocate for R-1, R-2 and R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents who appears on advance copy of the writ petition being served states that since all relevant documents have been filed along with the writ petition it may be heard for disposal today itself.2. Having joined CRPF as a Constable (GD) on March 13, 2009, on completion of 4 years service on March 13, 2013, the petitioner became eligible to appear at a Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for being appointed as an SI (GD).3. Petitioner took the LDCE-2014 Examination and was successful but was ho...
Y.S. Manchanda Vs. Jitender Chopra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2015 FAO(OS) 45/2015 Y.S. MANCHANDA ... Appellant versus JITENDER CHOPRA ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr G. L. Rawal, Sr Advocate with Mr Kuljeet Rawal and Mr Saurabh Malhotra : Mr P. K. Agrawal with Ms Mercy Hussain CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CAV952015 The learned counsel for the respondent/ caveator is present. The caveat stands discharged. CM15942015 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 45/2015 & CM15932015 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 01.12.2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in IA135702014, which was filed in CS(OS) 523/2005. The said application IA135702014 was one for recall of the order dated 08.05.2014 passed by the Local Commissioner, by which, the Local Commissioner had granted leave to the plaintiff to lead e...
Jagdish Ambedkar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. 12.2014 + % Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2015 W.P. (C) No.5484/2004 JAGDISH AMBEDKAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raj Kumar Bhartia, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC along with Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Advocate for R-1. Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for R-2 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present Writ Petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 16.01.2002 in M.A. No.273/2001, order dated 24.01.2001 in R.A. No.07/1999 and order dated 24.11.1998 in O.A. No.514/1993, whereby the Tribunal dismissed the applications.2. The Petitioner was appointed as Sub-Inspector (Executive) [SI (E)]. on 30.06.1979 in Delhi Police on the recommendations of the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) in the pay scale of Rs 425-15-530-EB-15-560-20-600. The Deputy Commissioner of Po...
Gilead Pharmasset, Llc Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2015 + WP(C) 687/2015 and CM No.1222/2015 GILEAD PHARMASSET, LLC ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Valini Panta, Mr. Prateek Sehrawat and Mr. Amrish Tiwari, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Manik Dogra, Sr. Govt. Counsel with Mr. Krishanu Barua and Mr. Nitya Sharma, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Geetanjali Sharma, Advocate for the opponent SANKALP REHABILITATION TRUST Mr. Rajeshwari H. Advocate for opponents BDR PHARMA and NATCO PHARMA Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Ms. Tanya Verma and Mr. Rajeshwar Nandan, Advocates for opponent IMAK CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 The instant writ petition has been filed to assail the order dated 13.01.2015, passed by respondent no.2. There is also a prayer made that the matt...
Neeraj Shukla Vs. Frankfinn Aviation Services (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 11/2015 Decided on:30. h January, 2015 % NEERAJ SHUKLA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Kamal Kr. Pandey, Adv. versus FRANKFINN AVIATION SERVICES (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through None Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM Nos. 1639-1640/2015 Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. C.R.P. 11/2015 & CM16382015 (stay) 1. The petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 5 th December, 2014 whereby leave to defend was granted to the respondent prefers the present petition.2. The petitioner filed suit under Order 37 CPC claiming that he was an employee of the defendant company and was appointed as Regional Head, Sales and Operations of Southern Region vide appointment letter dated 4th May, 2012 on which day he joined. On 7 th August, 2012 by a communication through e-mail he tendered his resignation with request for waiving of the notice period and his resignation was duly accepted with effect from the same date and ...
M/S. Amkv-Tecpro Vs. Gail (India) Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. No.145 of 2014 M/S.AMKV-TECPRO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr.Tarun Johri, Advocate. versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Ms.Deepika Tusir and Mr.Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocates AND O.M.P. No.151 of 2014 M/S.AMKV-TECPRO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr.Tarun Johri, Advocate. versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Ms.Deepika Tusir and Mr.Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER3001.2015 1. These are two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking interim reliefs.2. The Petitioner M/s AMKV-TECPRO is a consortium of TECPRO Systems Limited which undertakes turnkey projects. Mecon Limited (Respondent No.2), on behalf of Gail (India) Limited (Respondent No.1) floated an e-tender...
Aditya Ganapa and Anr. Vs. Religare Finvest Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. No.1038 of 2014 ADITYA GANAPA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. K. R. Chawla, Advocate. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER3001.2015 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an Award dated 21st May 2014 passed by the sole Arbitrator in regard to the claims filed by the Respondent/ claimant against the Petitioners.2. The Petitioners are stated to be in the flower business and based in Hyderabad. It is stated that by an agreement dated 24th June 2010, the Respondent Religare Finvest Ltd. (RFL) sanctioned to the Petitioners a loan of Rs.61 lakhs repayable in 120 equal monthly instalments of Rs.91,080 over a period of 10 years. At the time of sanctioning of the loan agreement, the Petitioners also signed other documents including a letter confirming the deposit of original title deeds of the pro...
Samir Kumar Ghosh Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
$~4. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:30. 01.2015 Crl.M.(Bail). No.28/2015 in CRL.A. 28/2014 SAMIR KUMAR GHOSH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Mr. Mishal Vij & Mr. Motish Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus C.B.I ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. This application has been preferred by the appellant under Section 389 Cr.P.C. to seek suspension of sentence and for grant of bail during the pendency of the appeal. The appeal was admitted on 14.02.2014 and has been directed to be listed in due course in its turn.2. The appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the Special Judge (PC Act), CBI-III, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CC No.49/12 dated 17.12.2013. By the impugned judgment, the appellant has been convicted of the charge under Section 7 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PC Act). appellant has been awarded the fol...
Uma Devi Deceased Thr. Lrs. Vs. Shivraj Krishan Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P.18/2013 Reserved on:20. h January, 2015 Decided on:30. h January, 2015 % UMA DEVI DECEASED THR. LRS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Bhatt with Mr. Kuber Giri, Advs. versus SHIVRAJ KRISHAN GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Adv. for R-1 to 3 & 8. Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Adv. for R-5. Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal, Adv. for R-6 & 7. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The petitioner had filed an application under Sections 151 and 152 CPC for correction of the name in the judgment and appointment of Commissioner to determine quantum of mesne profits in terms of order of this Court dated 24th July, 1998. Though vide impugned order dated 15 th October, 2012 corrections in the judgment dated 16th September, 2004 were carried out being typographical errors, however no order was passed regarding the prayer of appointment of Commissioner for mesne profit pendent-lite and interest against defendant No.7 who i...
New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Man Chand and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
$~S-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :30. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 7021/2013, C.M. NO.15194/2013 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Ms. Tinu Bajwa, Sh. Vikramaditya Singh and Sh. Sameer Sharma, Advocate. versus MAN CHAND AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. This matter is listed today since 23.01.2015 was declared a Court holiday.2. The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) the writ petitioner in these proceedings - is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in T.A. No.754/2009 dated 14.02.2012 and subsequently in review proceedings, R.A. No.140/2012. It is contended that the CAT fell into error in its appreciation that there could not have been a post or cadre-based reservation, but that in a case of recruitment throug...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »