Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Brij Lal Vs. Kuldeep Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.385/2014 & CM No.20363/2014 (for stay) Decided on :21. t January, 2015 BRIJ LAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sudhir Nagar, Advocate. versus KULDEEP KAUR ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 03.09.2014 passed by the learned ADJ upholding the judgment dated 07.08.2013 of the learned trial court passing a preliminary decree of possession in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and against the present appellant/defendant.2. Briefly stated the facts of the present case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for possession on account of arrears of rent and mesne profit.3. The case set up by the respondent/plaintiff was tha the present appellant was a tenant on the ground floor of the suit property i.e. 2151/6A, New Patel Nagar, Delhi with effect from 01.07.2006 on a monthly rent of Rs.4,500/- apart from water and electric...
the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Sh Mukesh Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2015
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t January, 2015 + MAC. APP.721/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus SH MUKESH KUMAR AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. impugns the judgment dated 01.06.2013 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.10,96,979/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 to 4 for the death of Smt. Shakuntala Devi, who was the mother of the claimants.2. While computing the compensation for loss of gratuitous services rendered by her (as home maker), the Claims Tribunal relied upon the judgment of this Court in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited v. Master Manmeet Singh and Ors., 2012 ACJ721 3. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that no deduction was made towards personal and living expense...
Mehfooz Khan Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:21. t January, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 4679/2014 & Crl.M.A. No.15928/2014 MEHFOOZ KHAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Bankim K. Kulshreshta, Adv. versus STATE( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with Insp. Vijay Kumar Kataria, Mr.Harender Singh, Additional SHO and Si Manish Chaudhary, P.S. Welcome. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Brief facts of the case are that a case under Section 302/34 IPC read with Section 25/27 Arms Act was registered vide FIR No.417/214 at Police Station Welcome. The complainant alleged that 3-4 persons had surrounded her husband at her house and one of them fired pistol which hit her husband. Her husband was declared brought dead in the hospital and at the time of transfer to hospital, the husband told the complainant that he was attacked by hulligans and goons of Anwar. The complainant alleged that she could identify those person...
Raju Vs. State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t January, 2015 + W.P.(CRL) 1256/2014 RAJU ..... Petitioner Through: versus Mr Ali Abbas, Adv. STATE & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Saleem Ahmad, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for Govt. of NCT of Delhi /R-1 to 4 % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA : SUNITA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.PC moved by the petitioner for issuance of writ of certiorari and in the nature of mandamus for transferring the investigation to Crime Branch, Delhi on the ground that on 16.04.2014, the petitioner went to the government tube well at Pul Prahladpur and saw that Neel Kanth, Ashok Pandey, Prem, Neeraj and Subhash all residents of Pul Prahaladpur were quarrelling with Amir and Shahrukh and were threatening them. The petitioner requested them not to abuse and harass the children whereupon accused abused the petitioner and threatened to teach a lesson. After sometime, the...
Harphool Kumawat Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : January 13, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 20, 2015 % + W.P.(C)2663/2012 HARPHOOL KUMAWAT Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.A.K.Gautam, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The writ petitioner challenges the order dated September 29, 2011 by Summary Security Force Court (hereinafter referred as SSFC) holding the petitioner guilty of the charge framed against him as well the sentence awarded to him to suffer imprisonment for one year in civil jail as well dismissal from service.2. The statutory petition in terms of Rule 167 of the BSF Act, 1958 filed by the petitioner was also rejected vide order dated April 25, 2012.3. The petitioner ex-constable Harphool Kumawat was enrolled in BSF on October 14, 2004. After completion of his training on October 15, 20...
Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Indo-Rama Synthetics Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:20. h January, 2015 + O.M.P. No.1036/2012 IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Saurav Aggarwal, Mr.Trinath, Mr.Mrinal OJha, Mr.Siddhanth Sharma and Mr.Bhuvan Mishra, Advs. versus INDO-RAMA SYNTHETICS LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Prag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. Mr.Joy Basu, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aayush Agarwal, Mr.Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms.Aanchal Mullick & Ms.Monisha Handa, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking setting aside of the Arbitral Award dated 1st August, 2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal of quorum comprising three arbitrators.2. Brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner is a Company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its regi...
Naresh Tharad Vs. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India An
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 4284/2012 & CM No.8890/2012, CM No.12079/2012 NARESH THARAD ..... Petitioner versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Subhiksh Vasudev, Mr. Karanveer Jindal and MsYukti. For the Respondents : Mr J.S. Bakshi, Mr. A.S. Bakshi and Mr.Ankush Sharma for R-1. Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.Saakshi Agarwal for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing of the report of the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (hereafter ICAI) dated 10.02.2012 (hereafter the impugned report).2. According to the petitioner a fair opportunity for being heard has been denied to him. The limited controversy to be considered is whether the proceedings before the Disciplinary Committee of the ICAI (hereafter the ...
Ram Niwas Jain Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h January, 2015 + W.P.(C) 3673/2013 & CM Nos.15368/2013 & 10465/2014 RAM NIWAS JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pravir Chowdhury, Adv. Versus MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saqib, Adv. for R-1. Mr. R.V. Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Addl. Standing Counsel, GNCTD for R-4 and 5. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr. Anshuman Nayak, Adv. for R-6 to 8. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. for the applicant in CM No.15368/2013. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), pleading: (i) that the petitioner had recently come to know of a big land scam carried out by the officials of the Land & Building Department of the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and was hence filing the petition to protect t...
Devinder Kumar Vs. B.S.E.S.Yamuna Power Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 792/2009 & CM128782014 (for dismissal of petition by R-2&3) Decided on:20. h January, 2015 % DEVINDER KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Yashpal Bharti, Mr. Bhavesh, Advs. versus B.S.E.S.YAMUNA POWER LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Adv. for R-2&3. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition impugns the order dated 23rd August, 2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge declining to grant interim relief of directing the officials of respondent No.1 to install the meter and to restrain the respondents No.2 and 3 from preventing the respondent No.1 from installing the connection and the order dated 12th February, 2009 whereby the Civil Judge dismissed the application for review of the order dated 23 rd August, 2008 and thereby praying directions to the respondent No.1 to install the meter and restrain the other respondents from preventing respond...
Pranidhi Commerce Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Religare Finvest Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 627/2014 & IA No.25041 of 2014 (for stay) PRANIDHI COMMERCE PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Kamal Budhiraja and Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ruchin Midha, Advocate. With ARB.P. 628/2014 & IA No.25049 of 2014 (for stay) KALYANI BARTER PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Kamal Budhiraja and Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ruchin Midha, Advocate. With ARB.P. 629/2014 & IA No.25055 of 2014 (for stay) YUTHIKA COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Airi, Mr. Kamal Budhiraja and Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri,...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »