Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 22 2015

Sheela Devi Vs. Krishna and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-22-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.366/2014 Decided on :22. d January, 2015 SHEELA DEVI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.C.Jain, Adv. versus KRISHNA & ORS ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. The learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the appellant had filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief and permanent injunction seeking to be declared owner of suit property bearing No.512, Gali No.9, Kanti Nagar, Delhi which was earlier known as Plot No.34, Block-B, out of Khasra No.61/229/2 situated at Village Ghondli in the abadi of Sant Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi, which has been negatived by the two courts below by a concurrent finding.4. In this regard, it has been contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the impugned order has not taken note of the fact that the appellant had proved ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2015

K.S.Meena and Ors. Vs. Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-22-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(Crl.) No.481/2007 Decided on :22. d January, 2015 K.S.MEENA & ORS. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Vineet Malhotra, Adv. versus NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Ritu Kumar, Adv.for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.13331/2012 1. This is an application filed by the respondent No.2 seeking recall of order dated 21.05.2012 under Section 151 CPC read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. though this is a criminal writ petition.2. By virtue of the order dated 21.05.2012, the writ petition of the petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn on account of a statement and a representation having been sent by the respondent No.2 from the Jail addressed to the Registrar General of this court to the effect that he does not want to pursue his criminal complaint against the present petitioners. The respondent No.2 by virtue of the present application is seeking to withdraw the said statement and consequently seeking ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2015

Mrs. Sushila Badola Vs. Shri Tushar Patni and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-22-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:22. d January, 2015 % + CRL. M.C. NO.1396/2010 MRS. SUSHILA BADOLA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Gaurav Puri, Adv. with Ms. Nupur Pandey, Mr.Varun Bhardwaj, Advs. versus SHRI TUSHAR PATNI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Satish Tamta, Adv. with Ms.Nisha Narayanan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the Complaint Case No.21/1 dated 8th February, 2010 and the notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. dated 6th April, 2010 and further proceedings arising out of the complaint pending before learned Metropolitan Magistrate.2. The Criminal Complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for a sum of Rs.75 lacs against alleged liability to pay an amount of Rs.3,00,00,000/- filed by respondent No.1 through respondent No.2 Mr. Prashant Mamgain who is allegedly holding ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2015

Sumita Dey Bhattacharya Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-22-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2118/2014 & CRL.M.A.16333/2004 Judgment dated 22nd January, 2015 % SUMITA DEY BHATTACHARYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Pradeep Jain, Mr.A.Samand, Mr.Shubhankar Jha, Kumar Vikram and Ms.Aakriti Mathur, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General with Mr.Kirtiman Singh, Central Government Standing Counsel, Mr.Waize Ali Noor and Ms.Shreya Sinha, Advocate for the Union of India. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI (ORAL) 1. Pleadings are complete. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.2. Petitioner, wife of the detenue, has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for issuance of a writ or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2015

Hav Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-2015

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : January 19, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on : January 21, 2015 + W.P.(C) 562/2015 HAV DADASO SAMPATRAO PHADTARE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S.S.Pandey, Advocate with Mr.H.S.Tiwari, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Arjun Mitra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 W.P.(C) 563/2015 HAV RAVINDRA SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.S.Pandey, Advocate with Mr.H.S.Tiwari, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Arjun Mitra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 W.P.(C) 565/2015 HAV CHAVHAN HEMANAND KRISHNA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S.S.Pandey, Advocate with Mr.H.S.Tiwari, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS W.P.(C) Nos.562/2015 & conn.matters Represented by: Mr.Arjun Mitra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 W.P.(C) 566/2015 HAV RAKESH SAINI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.S.Pandey, Advocate with Mr.H.S.Tiwari, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2015

Hav Bimal Chandra Mandal Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2015

Ex.Nk.Jyoti Kanta Mahapatra Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-2015

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : January 12, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on : January 21, 2015 + W.P.(C) 5373/2012 RAMESH KC Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Alok Kishore, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.K.Gautam, Advocate W.P.(C) 5374/2012 EX.NK.JYOTI KANTA MAHAPATRA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Alok Kishore, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.K.Gautam, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. In the two captioned writ petitions, two separate orders, both dated May 04, 2012, passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) Delhi Bench passed in T.A.No.164 of 2010 and T.A.175 of 2010 have been impugned whereby the petitions filed by the petitioners have been dismissed on the view taken by the Tribunal that the petitions are devoid of any merit. In both the petitions before the Tribunal, the petiti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2015

Ramashray Prasad Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:11. 11.2014 % + Judgment delivered on:21. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 5151/2011 RAMASHRAY PRASAD Through: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S.Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.2260/2008 dated 29.10.2010, and the order passed in R.A. No.2/2011 dated 07.01.2011. By the first order, the OA of the petitioner/applicant was dismissed, wherein the petitioner challenged the denial of promotion to him as Scientist Grade-F under the Flexible Complementing Scheme (FCS), and sought review by the Selection Committee to consider his case under the FCS for promotion as Scient...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2015