Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bunty @ Bharat Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : January 15, 2015 DECIDED ON : January 22, 2015 + CRL.A.915/2006 BUNTY @ BHARAT Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 20.09.2006 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.104/05 arising out of FIR3505 under Section 354/376/511 IPC registered at Police Station Hauz Qazi whereby the appellant Bunty @ Bharat was held guilty for committing offences under Section 354 and 376 read with Section 511 IPC. By an order dated 22.09.2006, the appellant was awarded RI for two under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. The prosecution case as reflected in the charge-sheet was that on 26.01.2005 at around 3:00 p.m., the appellant took the prosecutrix X (assumed name) aged seven years to his house and sex...
Bhim Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.66/2011 Reserved on:7. h January, 2015 Date of Decision:22. d January, 2015 % BHIM SINGH ..... Appellant Through Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate with Mr. Kunal Arora, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Varun Goswami, Additional Public Prosecutor with Inspector Raj Pal Singh, Ashok Vihar Traffic Circle. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J: Bhim Singh has challenged his conviction under Section 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) in Sessions Case No.34/2009 arising out of FIR No.122/2009, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla.2. The prosecution version, accepted by the trial court, is that the appellant Bhim Singh committed murder of Sharda, wife of Kanahiya Lal, in the night intervening 9th and 10th of May, 2009 in a house located opposite electric pole No.EP-153, E-Block, Qutub Vihar, Goyala Dairy, Delhi. Thereafter, the dead bod...
Mankind Pharma Ltd Vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :15. 01.2015 Judgment delivered on :22. 01.2015 CS(OS) 2047/2014 MANKIND PHARMA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Hemant Daswani, Mr.Harsh Vardhan, Mr.Niloy Dasgupta, Mr. Anirban Sen and Mr.Namit Suri, Advocates. versus CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD AND ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Manish Kumar Choudhary and Mr.C.S.Patney, Advocates. INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A.No.12676/2014 (XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC) 1 Plaintiff, a duly incorporated company, is stated to be a reputed manufacturer pharmaceutical, and merchant neutraceutical, of vide range of veterinary and cosmetics preparations in India sold under its various well-known distinctive trademarks including MANKIND. This trademark was adopted by the plaintiff in the year 1986. Although it is a dictionary word but the plaintiff company was the first in India to introduce the word in the market by virtue of qualitative, affordable pharmaceuticals. Prior t...
the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I Vs. Mohan Meakins Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$~65 to 87, 93 to 95 & 103 to 105 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. 01.2015 + + + + + ITA4292013 ITA4302013 ITA4312013 ITA4322013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I ..... Appellant Through Mr. Balbir Singh, sr. standing counsel with Mr. Abhishek Singh Baghel, Adv. versus MOHAN MEAKINS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. C S Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. ITA4332013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III ..... Appellant Through Mr. Balbir Singh, sr. standing counsel with Mr. Abhishek Singh Baghel, Adv. versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD. Through + + + + + + ..... Respondent Mr. C S Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. ITA5222013 ITA5302013 ITA5342013 ITA5352013 ITA5362013 ITA5372013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL - III ITA Nos.429-433/2013, 522/2013, 530/2013, 534-537/2013, 252-256/2014, 418-423/2014, 447/2014, 759-761/2014 & 782-784/2014 Page | 1 Through ..... Appellant Mr. Balbir Singh, sr. standing coun...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Archana Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 301/ 2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus ARCHANA SINGH & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. D.K. Sharma Adv. for R-1 to 6. MAC.APP. 423/ 2013 ARCHANA SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma Adv. for Appellants No.1 to 6 versus SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 31.01.2012 whereby compensation of Rs.1,39,20,125/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 to 6 in MAC APP No.301/2013. The same was calculated as: S.No.Head of Compensation Granted by the Claims Tribunal 1,38,70,125/- 1. Loss of Dependency 2. Loss of Love and Affection 25,000/- 3. Loss of Estate 10,000/- 4. Funeral Expenses 5. Loss of Consortium 5,000/10,000/Total 3. 1,39,20,125/- For th...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nutan Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$-39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 274/2007 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate versus NUTAN DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against judgment dated 07.02.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby in a petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988(the Act), compensation of Rs.4,65,000/- was awarded to Respondents no.1 to 4 for the death of Shiv Kumar, who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 23.02.2005 at about 11:00 p.m.2. Relying on National Insurance Company Limited v. Sinitha & Ors., (2012) (2) SCC356and Ningamma & Anr. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2009) 13 SCC710 the learned counsel for the Appellant Insurance Company contends that deceased Shiv Kumar had borrowed the two-wheeler (motorcycle) bearing no....
Arif Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. A. No.1428/2011 Decided on 22nd January, 2015 ARIF Through ..... Appellant :Mr. B.P. Singh, Mr. K.V. Sreenithun and Mr. Devender Kumar, Adv. with appellant in person. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 21st October, 2011 and order on sentence dated 22nd October, 2011, whereby appellant has been convicted under Sections 394/34 as well as Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and pay fine of `5,000/- each for both the offences, appellant has preferred this appeal.2. Factual matrix as unfolded is that on 5th January, 2010 at about 8:00 PM, an information was received in the Police Station Krishna Nagar, Delhi from one Shri Ram Singh that on the main road of Vishwas Nagar, two persons had committed robbery at the point of knife, ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 587/2011 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. versus ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Shanta Devi Raman, Adv. for R-1. Mr.A.P.Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant United Insurance Company Limited impugns the judgment dated 21.03.2011 passed by the Claims Tribunal awarding compensation of ` 6,95,951/- to Respondent no.1 for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 16.01.2005.2. Relying on Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar & Anr., 2011 (1) SCC343 the sole ground of challenge raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that Respondent no.1 was employed as a driver in Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC). He suffered 62% disability in respect of his right lower limb leading to permanent locomotor impairment. Though, on account of the injuries s...
Archana Singh and Ors. Vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 301/ 2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus ARCHANA SINGH & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. D.K. Sharma Adv. for R-1 to 6. MAC.APP. 423/ 2013 ARCHANA SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma Adv. for Appellants No.1 to 6 versus SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 31.01.2012 whereby compensation of Rs.1,39,20,125/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 to 6 in MAC APP No.301/2013. The same was calculated as: S.No.Head of Compensation Granted by the Claims Tribunal 1,38,70,125/- 1. Loss of Dependency 2. Loss of Love and Affection 25,000/- 3. Loss of Estate 10,000/- 4. Funeral Expenses 5. Loss of Consortium 5,000/10,000/Total 3. 1,39,20,125/- For th...
Amresh Kumar and Anr. Vs. Savita Devi @ Guriya and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 888/2012 AMRESH KUMAR & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SAVITA DEVI @ GURIYA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant impugns the judgment dated 11.07.2012 whereby a compensation of Rs.10,94,550/- was awarded to Respondents No.1 to 3 for the death of Ajit Kumar Singh, who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 31.12.2007.2. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant (owner and driver of the offending vehicle) that the accident was not caused by Maruti Car No.DL8 1139. The Appellants were hence, not liable for any compensation.3. It is urged that the Claims Tribunal erred in believing the testimony of PW-3 Constable Bharat Lal and discarding the testimony of the Appellants both of whom entered in the witness box. In the alternati...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »