Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Radhey Shyam and Ors Vs. Gnct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.471/2015 & conn. 22nd January , 2015 % + W.P.(C) 471/2015 and C.M.Nos.789-90/2015 RADHEY SHYAM AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Advocate with Prof. Dr. N.R.Singh , Incharge Medical Supt. Of R-2. W.P.(C) 474/2015 and C.M. Nos.796-97/2015 SOM DUTT AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Advocate with Prof. Dr. N.R.Singh , Incharge Medical Supt. Of R-2. W.P.(C) 482/2015 and C.M. Nos.812-13/2015 REKHA YADAV AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Advocate with Prof. Dr. N.R.Singh , Incharge Medical Supt. Of R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(...
Kumer Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 22, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4032/2014 KUMER SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Vardhman Kaushik, Advocate with Mr.N.D.Kaushik, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate Mr.Arvind Sharma, Dy.Cmdt., BSF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The instant writ petition brings to the fore a tale of a member of the society who seeks to find the lost foothold in the society; both in the economic sense and the social sense.2. Kumer Singh, is domiciled in village Moroli, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan and belongs to the Gujjar Community; a backward class in the State of Rajasthan, forefathers of which community used to earn their livelihood rearing cattle and members of the community continue to earn their bread rearing cattle. In the social hierarchy in the State of Rajasthan the Gujja...
Asim Khan Vs. Zahid Ali and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 81/2012 & CM12252012 (Stay) Decided on:22. d January, 2015 % ASIM KHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Risha Mittal and Mr. Vatsal Kumar, Advocates. versus ZAHID ALI & ORS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ..... Respondent MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugnes the order dated 30th November, 2011 whereby the application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, filed by the petitioner before the learned trial court seeking amendment of the plaint, was dismissed.2. Notice in this petition has been served on respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Respondent No.3 had already been proceeded ex-parte before the learned trial Court. Despite service of notice, none has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No.4. Today, despite three pass overs, none is present on behalf of respondents. Thus, I have proceeded to hear and dispose of the matter.3. The petitioner/plaintiff filed the suit being CS (OS) No.578/2010 on 28th July, 2010 which wa...
Affle Holdings Pte Limited Vs. Saurabh Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 12.2014 Judgment delivered on:22. 01.2015 % + OMP12572014 AFFLE HOLDINGS PTE LIMITED ..... Petitioner VERSUS SAURABH SINGH AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. N. Ganpathy, Mr. Gautam Varma and Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Sandeep Grover, Mr. Paresh and Mr. Aditya Nayyar, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER OMP12572014 AND IA No.23684/2014 (u/O. 39 R. 4 CPC by R-1) 1. On 16.10.2014, I had granted an exparte interim order in favour of the petitioner in terms of prayer clause (a), (d) and (e). In so far as relief sought in prayer clause (b) was concerned, injunction was restricted to the car owned by respondent no.1, which is a BMW5Series Car, bearing registration no.UP16 U5599. 1.1 This interim order was modified on 17.10.2014 on account of an application filed by the petitioner, being : IA No.20555/201...
Vinit Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : January 22, 2015 + W.P.(C) 187/2015 VINIT KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.J.S.Mann, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Ajay Kalra, Advocate Major Manoj Bos, Adjutant, MRC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced the relevant record with respect to the issue raised in the writ petition and it is agreed between learned counsel for the parties that formal counter affidavit need not be filed and the writ petition could be decided with reference to the record which has been produced.2. The undisputed position is that there exists a policy of the Indian Army to recruit Junior Commissioned Officers in the Indian Army under the Relationship Category, meaning thereby certain percentage of appointments is restricted to those prospective...
Jaygee Hospitality Services Private Limited Vs. Pvr Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 9/2015 Decided on:22. d January, 2015 % JAYGEE HOSPITALITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vibhore Bagga, Advocate. versus PVR LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Aman Nandrajog and Mr. Govind Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM No.1223/2015 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. 9/2015 and CM No.1222/2015 (for stay) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23rd December, 2014 whereby his application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was dismissed, which order of the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller has been upheld by the learned Additional District Judge on 15th January, 2015 which is impugned in the present petition.2. Undisputed facts are that the petitioner is the licensee of the respondent since 15th June, 2011 for a kiosk/space in the food court. The leave and license was reduced t...
Statesman Limited Vs. Anil Dogra and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 12, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on : January 22, 2015 + LPA6432012 STATESMAN LIMITED Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Samar Bansal, Advocate with Mr.Vinayak Mehrotra, Advocate versus ANIL DOGRA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Atul T.N., Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The Appropriate Government made a reference of an industrial dispute to the Labour Court, when the first respondent was dismissed from service with effect from February 01, 1997, post inquiry held against her.2. The first respondent was engaged as a receptionist-cum-typist by the appellant on December 20, 1972 and her claim before the Labour Court was that due to she being involved in the activities of the Union of which she was a member, the management of the appellant, with mala-fide intent issued a charge-sheet to her on March 12, 1994 alleging the followi...
State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Damodar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 422/2012 Reserved on:16. h January, 2015 Date of decision:22. d January, 2015 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. versus DAMODAR SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rabindra Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.This is a petition under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 7.10.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (East), FTC, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, acquitting the Respondent for the charges under Section 302/404 IPC.2. Dead body of one male with gunshot injuries was found near Sabzi Mandi, near House No.B-453 on 26.2.2010. The deceased had a bullet entry wound on the chest and exit wound on the back. Photographs of the scene of crime and chance finger prints were obtained. The dead body was later identified to be that of Dinesh Pr...
Ravi and Anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal 1278/2010 Reserved on:6. h January, 2015 Date of Decision:22. d January, 2015 % Ravi & Anr. Through ....Appellants Ms. Dimple Vivek, Advocate. Versus Respondent State Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP with Insp. Surender Kumar, SI Ravi Kumar, P.S. Subzimandi. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SANJIV KHANNA, J.Ravi and his mother Bimla, by the impugned judgment dated 4th September, 2010 stand convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short), for causing death of Rajesh son of Om Prakash. By order of sentence dated 7th September, 2010, they have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fined Rs.10,000/- each and in default to undergo imprisonment for a period of 3 years. The impugned judgment arises out of charge-sheet filed in FIR No.303/2008, P.S. Subzi Mandi.2. The impugned judgment acquits 7 others from the charge under Section 302 read w...
Pramod Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2015
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 22, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6553/2013 PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Alka Sharma, Advocate with Ms.Abha Malhotra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Relevant facts necessary to be noted for adjudication of the present petition are that the petitioner is working on the post of Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) in Central Reserve Police Force.2. The petitioner was posted in the office of the Directorate General, CRPF at New Delhi in the year 2002. By virtue of his posting in Delhi the petitioner was allotted family Quarter No.4, Block No.40, Type-II, Group Centre, CRPF, Jharoda Kalan, New Delhi on September 23, 2002.3. On March 20, 2008, the Directorate General, CRPF notified Central Reserve Police Force Family Accommodation Rules, 200...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »