Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nokia Solutions and Networks India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr Vs. Union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7011/2012 & CM100562013 M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6800/2013 NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 1663/2012 EI DUPONT INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms Sonu Bhatnagar and Mr Udit Jain for petitioner in W.P.(C) 7011/2012. Mr Tarun Gulati and Ms Vibhooti Malhotra in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1 in W.P.(C) 7011/2012 and W.P.(C) 1663/2012. Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Saakshi Agarwal for R-1 to R-4/UOI in W.P.(C) 1663/2012. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 ...
Symantec Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and Ors Vs. Ms. R. Modi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : December 15, 2014 DECIDED ON : January 27, 2015 + CS(OS) 1842/2008 SYMANTEC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.R.K.Virmani, Sr.Advocate with Mr.P.Anand, Mr.Shantanu & Mr.Ashish, Advocates. versus MS. R. MODI & ORS. Through : ..... Defendants Mr.C.M.Lall, Advocate with Ms.Nancy Roy, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The order is pronounced today as 23.01.2015 was declared holiday on account of Full Dress Rehearsal of Republic Day, 2015. IA No.22920/2012 (For recalling the summons issued to witnesses) 1. The instant suit is for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyrights, delivery up, rendition of accounts, damages etc. instituted by the plaintiffs against the defendants. After the settlement of issues on 26.10.2009 and two additional issues on 4.10.2010, the plaintiffs examined five witnesses PW-1 (Ashwin Mehta), PW-2 (Gaurav Shankar), PW-3 (Ms.Tanu Arora), PW-4 (Vi...
Iklakh @ Bablu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : JANUARY21 2015 DECIDED ON : JANUARY27 2015 + CRL.A. 176/2014 and Crl.M.B.145/2015 (u/S389Cr.P.C.) IKLAKH @ BABLU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr.Shiv Chopra and Ms.Megha, Advocates. VERSUS STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Iklakh @ Bablu challenges the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 18.12.2013 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.46/13 arising out of FIR26611 under Section 363/376 IPC registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden by which he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 376 IPC. By an order dated 19.12.2013, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine `2,000/-.2. The prosecution case as reflected in the charge-sheet was that on 26.07.2011 at about 03:30 p.m. the appellant kidnapped X (assumed name) aged 16 years from the lawful guardianship of her parents without their...
M/S Yum Restaurants (I) Pvt.Ltd and Anr Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7011/2012 & CM100562013 M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6800/2013 NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 1663/2012 EI DUPONT INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms Sonu Bhatnagar and Mr Udit Jain for petitioner in W.P.(C) 7011/2012. Mr Tarun Gulati and Ms Vibhooti Malhotra in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1 in W.P.(C) 7011/2012 and W.P.(C) 1663/2012. Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Saakshi Agarwal for R-1 to R-4/UOI in W.P.(C) 1663/2012. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 ...
Ei Dupont India Pvt Ltd and Anr Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7011/2012 & CM100562013 M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6800/2013 NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 1663/2012 EI DUPONT INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms Sonu Bhatnagar and Mr Udit Jain for petitioner in W.P.(C) 7011/2012. Mr Tarun Gulati and Ms Vibhooti Malhotra in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1 in W.P.(C) 7011/2012 and W.P.(C) 1663/2012. Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Saakshi Agarwal for R-1 to R-4/UOI in W.P.(C) 1663/2012. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 ...
Dasrath and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 27, 2015 + W.P.(C) 727/2015 DASRATH & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Subhashish Mohanty, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.1297/2015 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.727/2015 1. The issue concerns implementation, after interpretation, of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, which came into effect retrospectively from January 01, 2006.2. The rules were formulated after the Government of NCT accepted, with modification, the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission.3. As is well-known by now, the Sixth Central Pay Commission made a radical change vis-a-vis the recommendations of the earlier pay commissions wherein, in the past, replacement pay scales were recommended to the exi...
M/S. Utc Fire and Security India Ltd. Vs. Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 529/2014 % Judgement reserved on:08. 12.2014 Judgement pronounced on:27. 01.2015. M/S UTC FIRE & SECURITY INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Jasleen K. Oberoi and Ms Surbhi Mehta, Advs. versus BHARTIYA RAIL BIJLEE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr S.K. Taneja, Senior Advocate with Mr Shishir Mathur, Mr Sheel Vardhan and Mr S.K. Masuria along with AR of BRBCL for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with the prayer that respondent Nos.1 and 2 be restrained from taking any action in respect of letter dated 05.05.2014 of invocation of bank guarantee. The admitted facts of the case are that:2. The petitioner and the respondent had entered into two composite Contract No.CS0270-151-2-FC-NOA-BRCBL/Nabinagar/10-11/22A dated 21.07.2010 relating to de...
Dr. Mukul Gupta Vs. Management Development Institute and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % DR. MUKUL GUPTA W.P.(C) No.7944/2014 27th January, 2015 ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Lokesh Bhola & Mr. Anubhav Ray, Advs. versus MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE & ANR..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Arora and Ms. Ritu Arora, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No doubt, courts at Delhi seem to be a favoured destination of certain litigants and lawyers, however, this favoured destination if the same is approached, has necessarily to be only if whole or part of the cause of action arises as per Article 226(2) of the Constitution of India for the writ petition to be filed before this Court. The only other alternative as per which this Court can entertain the writ petition is, even if the cause of action, whole or part does not arise within the jurisdiction of this Court, provided the authorities against which the writ has to b...
M/S Lancome Parfums Et Beaute and Cie Vs. Mr. Navin and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :20.01.2015 Judgment delivered on :27.01.2015 CS(OS) 474/2009 M/S LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE AND CIE ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.S.K.Bansal, Mr. Sajay Amitahb Suman and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates. Versus MR. NAVIN AND ANOTHER ..... Defendants Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Present suit has been filed by M/s Lancome Parfums Et Beaute & hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) under Sections 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 for permanent injunction with a prayer to restrain the defendants/their partners/associates/agents (of whom Navin Kumar is stated to be proprietor of M/s Bharti International Cosmetics located at 2422, Gali No.14, Main Road, Bechari City, Shahdara and also functioning from first floor, Rui Mandi, Teliwara, Sadar Bazar, Delhi) from using, selling, soliciting, extorting displaying, advertising or in any manner dealing with the impugned trade mark LANCOME or a...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shri Rahul Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2015
$-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1092/2013 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Advocate versus SHRI RAHUL SHARMA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. H. Bhargav, Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. S.S. Mahaur, Advocate for Respondent no.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL ORDER G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. impugns judgment dated 26.08.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.14,54,005/- was awarded in favour of Respondent no.1 for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 12.10.2011 at about 13:30 hrs.2. It may be noted that the instant claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988(the Act). The Appellant Insurance Company in terms of the agreed procedure made an offer of Rs.6,90,000/- in full and final settlement of the claim of Responde...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »