Court : Delhi
$~A-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:15. 01.2015 Judgment pronounced on:30. 01.2015 + CS(OS) 737/1984 RAM GOPAL versus RAM CHARAN ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Samar Bansal and Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra Advs ..... Defendant Through Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr Adv. with Sandeep Mital, Ms. Rupali Kapoor and Mr. Mridul Yadav Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA.No.13663/2013 (for rectification of decree dated 14.02.2008 by defendant No.1) 1. This is an application filed by defendant No.1 under Sections 151, 152 and 153 of CPC for rectification/modification of order dated 14.02.2008.2. A brief narration of background facts is necessary. This litigation is one of the various family litigations that were pending within the family of late Sh. Ganeshi Lal and Smt.Kasturi Devi. Sh. Ram Gopal, the plaintiff and Sh.Ram Charan, defendant No.1 are the two sons of late Sh. Ganeshi Lal and Smt. Kasturi. In 1962 the plaintiff, defendant No.1 and their father ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.943/2015 & CM Nos.1653-1654/2015 % 30th January, 2015 SUBHA KUMAR DASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Prasad with Ms. Reeja Varghese, Adv. versus THE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-1/University of Delhi. Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.1654/2015 (Exemption) Exemption as prayed for is allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 943/2015 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner, who is an employee of the respondent No.2/college, essentially, impugning the issuing of the charge-sheet dated 31.12.2014 and the suspension order of the same date.2. Before I turn to the facts of the present case, it needs to be mentioned that...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 161/2009 Reserved on:22. d January, 2015 Decided on:30. h January, 2015 % ASHA KHANNA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. N.N. Aggarwal, Mr. Ashish and Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocates. versus PANKAJ KHANNA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Mr. Vishal Mahajan and Mr. Rohan Gupta, Advocates for R-1, 2, 7 and 8. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 20 th October 2009 whereby their application under VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC filed as respondents in Probate Case No.218/2006 was dismissed.2. After the death of Shri Mulakh Raj Khanna disputes and differences arose between his son J.N. Khanna, Prem Khanna and Pran Khanna and the original owner of property No.BB-15 measuring 509/58 sq.yds now known as Greater Kailash Enclave -II regarding a construction agreement entered between Roshan Lal Kapoor with Shri Mulakh Raj Khanna and M/s. Mulakh Raj Khanna (H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 992/2011 Judgment reserved on 6th January, 2015 Judgment produced on 30th January, 2015 % VIKAS alias VICKY alias PONGA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J1 Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, against the judgment and order on sentence dated 4.6.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge01 (Outer), Rohini, Delhi, by which the appellant has been directed to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.4,000/- and in default of payment of fine Simple Imprisonment for two months for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code; Rigorous Imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine Simple Imprisonment...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 21, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: January 30, 2015 + LPA7422013 D.K.GUPTA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ashok Bhalla, Advocate versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Gaurav Goyal and Ms.Divyangana Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. WP(C) No.3698/1998 filed by the appellant challenging the penalty of he being removed from service has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment dated August 06, 2013. The appellant challenges the said decision of the learned Single Judge and prays that the relief prayed for in the writ petition filed by him should be granted.2. Employed in the Management Cadre of the Punjab National Bank, the appellant was functioning as a Senior Manager at the branch of the bank at Paharganj in Delhi. He had forwarded a proposa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. 12.2014 + % Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2015 W.P. (C) No.5484/2004 JAGDISH AMBEDKAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raj Kumar Bhartia, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC along with Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Advocate for R-1. Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for R-2 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present Writ Petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 16.01.2002 in M.A. No.273/2001, order dated 24.01.2001 in R.A. No.07/1999 and order dated 24.11.1998 in O.A. No.514/1993, whereby the Tribunal dismissed the applications.2. The Petitioner was appointed as Sub-Inspector (Executive) [SI (E)]. on 30.06.1979 in Delhi Police on the recommendations of the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) in the pay scale of Rs 425-15-530-EB-15-560-20-600. The Deputy Commissioner of Po...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 271/2013 & CM115882013 (stay) Reserved on:15. h January, 2015 Decided on:30. h January, 2015 % RAMPAT Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Srivastava, Mr. Ashish Sindhu, Advs. versus GANGA DEVI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Gita Dhingra, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 27th April, 2013 declining to grant leave to defend to the petitioner in an eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) the petitioner prefers the present petition.2. In the eviction petition, the respondent pleaded that the respondent was the owner of premises No.79 (Village Bhadola) Delhi wherein 7 shops had been carved out on the ground floor bearing Shop Nos. T-9/1 to T-9/7. The tenanted shop is shop in the said property which was let out to the petitioner vide rent agreement dated 11th July, 1997 on a monthly r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:30. h January, 2015 % + RC. REV. NO.575/2012 M.C. GOYAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Gandhi, Adv. and Mr. Shivanshu Kumar, Advs. versus SARDAR MEHAR SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr. Purushotam Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) read with Sections 115 and 151 CPC has assailed the eviction order dated 5th September, 2012 passed by Additional Rent Controller, North-West, Rohini, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioner in respect of shops No.1 and 2, ground floor of property bearing No.1542, Tri Nagar, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted shops). It was the case of the respondent that the petitioner was inducted as tenant on 18th Octo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:13. h January, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:30. h January, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 828/2002 SUBHASH CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr. Utkarsh Saxena, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. P.K.Mishra, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 05.05.2001 and order on sentence dated 04.06.2001 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.3,000/- under Section 304A IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four months; sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months and fine of Rs.1,000/- under Section 279 IPC, in default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month and upholding the same by the learned Ad...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : December 16, 2014 DECIDED ON : January 30, 2015 + CS(OS) 624/2008 HARI RAM GUPTA & ORS. Through : ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Ankur Gosain, Advocate. VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Rajinder Mathur, Advocate for Defendant No.2 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.IA Nos. 613/2012 (u/O XII R6CPC) 1. The plaintiffs have instituted the instant suit for possession, mandatory and permanent injunctions against the defendants. Defendant No.3 is a proforma party. The relief sought is primarily against defendant No.2. It is averred in the plaint that a portion measuring approximate 127 sq.yards in property bearing No.F-144, Main Bazaar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi was purchased by the plaintiffs No.1 & 2 along with defendant No.3 from one Smt.Parbati Devi vide an Agreement dated 28.05.1992 and other documents. The said portion has been shown in blue colour in the site plan attached. Smt.Parbati Devi, ...
Tag this Judgment!