Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
the Union of India and Ors Vs. M/S Rishi Engineering and Construction ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 1625/2014 THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. A.S. Dateer, Advocate Versus M/S RISHI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 30.01.2015 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeks setting aside of the arbitral award dated 1 st September, 2014 of a sole Arbitrator (being the Deputy CE/C/T&C, Northern Railways, Kashmere Gate, Delhi and nominated as the Arbitrator by the General Manager, Northern Railways of the petitioner Railways, in accordance with Clause 2900 of Indian Railway Standard Conditions of Contract) to the extent the same allows the claim of the respondent in the sum of Rs.46,67,344/- against the petitioner and dismisses the counter-claim of the petitioner Railways.2. The petition came up before this Court first on 22nd December, 2014 when after hearing the counsel for the petitioner...
Shankar Kumar (Constable) Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 20, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 30, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4058/2014 SHANKAR KUMAR (CONSTABLE) ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Raman K.Singh, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Debajyoti Behuria, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. Working as a Constable with CISF since the year 2000 and posted in the year 2004 at the Kandla Port Trust Complex, New Kandla, District Kutch (Gujarat) a charge memo was served upon the petitioner on March 29, 2005 alleging as under:Force No.002240158 Const. (Under suspension) Shankar Kumar, CISF, Unit KPT Kandla, during posting on his duty in the Crime Control & Information Department of the Unit on 06.12.2004 at around 2145 hours one Tata Sumo was allowed to go out of the gate without any security check by the Const. (under suspension) D.P. Bhai, posted on his duty of ...
Food Corporation of India, Amritsar Vs. M/S Guru Arjan Dev Rice Mills ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. No.1651/2014 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, AMRITSAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma & Mr. K. Mathur, Advs. Versus M/S GURU ARJAN DEV RICE MILLS, AMRITSAR & ORS. Through: None. ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 30.01.2015 1. This petition, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeks setting aside of the arbitral award dated 6 th August, 2014 of the sole Arbitrator (who as per the Arbitration Agreement between the parties providing for the arbitration of the Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA), New Delhi was to be appointed / nominated by the Senior Regional Manager / Zonal Manager of the petitioner out of the persons on the panel of arbitrators maintained by ICA) allowing the claim of the petitioner in the sum of Rs.45,68,756/- against the respondents to the extent of Rs.2,04,724/only.2. This petition came up before this Court first on 22nd December, 2014 when ...
Commissioner of Income Tax-Vi Vs. M/S Yum Restaurants (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
$~5 to 8 &16 to 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 01.2015 Pronounced on:30. 01.2015 + ITA6142014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant versus M/S. YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT. LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA6192014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant versus M/S. YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT. LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA6612014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant versus M/S. YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT. LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA7102014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant versus M/S. YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT. LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA1512012, C.M. APPL.14484/2012, 14485/2012 & 14486/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus YUM RESTAURANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. ITA6142014 AND CONNECTED MATTERS ..... Respondent Page 1 + ITA1522012, C.M. APPL.14478/2012, 14479/2012 & 14480/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus YUM RESTAURANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA1582012, C.M. APPL.14481/2012, 14482/2012 & 14483/2012...
D.K.Gupta Vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 21, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: January 30, 2015 + LPA7422013 D.K.GUPTA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ashok Bhalla, Advocate versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Gaurav Goyal and Ms.Divyangana Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. WP(C) No.3698/1998 filed by the appellant challenging the penalty of he being removed from service has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment dated August 06, 2013. The appellant challenges the said decision of the learned Single Judge and prays that the relief prayed for in the writ petition filed by him should be granted.2. Employed in the Management Cadre of the Punjab National Bank, the appellant was functioning as a Senior Manager at the branch of the bank at Paharganj in Delhi. He had forwarded a proposa...
Dinesh Singh Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :22. d January, 2015 DECIDED ON :30. h January, 2015 + CRL.A.515/2013 & CRL.M.B.No.11264/2014 DINESH SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Dinesh Singh challenges the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 24.01.2013 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.60/11 arising out of FIR No.75/2011 under Section 376/506 IPC registered at Police Station Ranhola, by which he was held guilty under Section 376/506 IPC. By an order dated 28.01.2013, the appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years with fine `2,000/- under Section 376 IPC and RI for two years under Section 506 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant in the charge-sheet were that on 10.04.2011 in the afternoon at H.No.B-43, Gali Matk...
Subhash Chand Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:13. h January, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:30. h January, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 828/2002 SUBHASH CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr. Utkarsh Saxena, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. P.K.Mishra, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 05.05.2001 and order on sentence dated 04.06.2001 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.3,000/- under Section 304A IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four months; sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months and fine of Rs.1,000/- under Section 279 IPC, in default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month and upholding the same by the learned Ad...
Subha Kumar Dash Vs. The University of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.943/2015 & CM Nos.1653-1654/2015 % 30th January, 2015 SUBHA KUMAR DASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Prasad with Ms. Reeja Varghese, Adv. versus THE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-1/University of Delhi. Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.1654/2015 (Exemption) Exemption as prayed for is allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 943/2015 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner, who is an employee of the respondent No.2/college, essentially, impugning the issuing of the charge-sheet dated 31.12.2014 and the suspension order of the same date.2. Before I turn to the facts of the present case, it needs to be mentioned that...
Commissioner of Income Tax-I Vs. Bougainvillea Multiplex Entertainment ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 09, 2015 Pronounced on: January 30, 2015 + + + + ITA5862013 ITA5872013 ITA1612014 ITA2042014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Madan and Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocates. Versus BOUGAINVILLEA MULTIPLEX ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. These four income tax appeals under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) give rise to common question of law and, therefore, have been heard together and are being decided through this common judgment.2. The respondent assessee is engaged in the business of running of multiplex cinema halls and shopping malls in the name and style of Spice World situated at 1-2, Sector 25A, Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, (Uttar Pradesh), and has...
Hari Ram Gupta and Ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : December 16, 2014 DECIDED ON : January 30, 2015 + CS(OS) 624/2008 HARI RAM GUPTA & ORS. Through : ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Ankur Gosain, Advocate. VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Rajinder Mathur, Advocate for Defendant No.2 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.IA Nos. 613/2012 (u/O XII R6CPC) 1. The plaintiffs have instituted the instant suit for possession, mandatory and permanent injunctions against the defendants. Defendant No.3 is a proforma party. The relief sought is primarily against defendant No.2. It is averred in the plaint that a portion measuring approximate 127 sq.yards in property bearing No.F-144, Main Bazaar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi was purchased by the plaintiffs No.1 & 2 along with defendant No.3 from one Smt.Parbati Devi vide an Agreement dated 28.05.1992 and other documents. The said portion has been shown in blue colour in the site plan attached. Smt.Parbati Devi, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »