Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 2 of about 257 results (0.021 seconds)Tech Plus Media Private Ltd Vs. Jyoti Janda and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:29. h September, 2014 + CS(OS) 119/2010 & IA No.920/2010 (of the plaintiff u/O-39 R1&2 CPC) and IA No.924/2010 (of the plaintiff u/S79of the Information Technology Act, 2000) TECH PLUS MEDIA PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikas Sethi & Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advs. versus JYOTI JANDA & ORS Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Mithilesh Kumar & Mr. Mallika Arjun, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, passing off, unfair competition and for ancillary reliefs of rendition of accounts, delivery and damages, pleading:(a) that the plaintiff is a leading industry publication house in the sphere of Information Technology having a print media publication called IT Price Var and online news portal called ITVARNEWS.NET dedicated to Information Technology channels an...
Tag this Judgment!Minu Chibber and ors. Vs. Lt. Col. (Retd.) S.S. Chibber
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h September, 2014 % + FAO (OS) No.205/2013 MINU CHIBBER & ORS. Through: .. Appellants Mr. D.P. Singh with Ms. Sonam Gupta, Mr. Rajkiran Vats, Mr. Salil Bhattacharya & Mr. R.P. Vyas, Advs. Versus LT. COL. (RETD.) S.S. CHIBBER .. Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Goel & Ms. Gausia Shah, Advs. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 impugns the order dated 15th March, 2013 (of the learned Single Judge of this Court exercising Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction in CS(OS) No.2521/2010 filed by the respondent / plaintiff) of dismissal of IA No.7092/2011 filed by the appellants / defendants under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ex parte ad-interim order dated 22nd April, 2013 which continues to be in force, the proceedings in the suit before the learned Single Judge were stayed. ...
Tag this Judgment!Ranjeet @ Sonu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 25, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: September 29, 2014 % + CRL.A.1068/2014 RANJEET @ SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Mr.Prem Prakash, Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Ms.Janhavi Mahana, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Manoj Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Ranjeet @ Sonu is aggrieved by the judgment dated April 03, 2014 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated April 29, 2014 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `50,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. Besides Ranjeet @ Sonu, Inderjeet Singh @ Indee, Chander Shekhar @ Pinku, Shyam Singh and Rattan Singh were also charge sheeted as accused for conspiracy however, the learned Trial ...
Tag this Judgment!Gaby Lalmuanpuii and ors Vs. University of Delhi, Faculty of Medical S ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6251/2014 & CM APPLs. 15101-15102/2014, 15744/2014 GABY LALMUANPUII & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Ms. Indu Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikram Mehta, Ms. Suman Yadav and Mr. Gaurang Panandiker, Advocates versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI, FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Advocates for R-1/DU. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) for R-3/MAMC. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocate for R4/UOI. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Mr. Manan Khera, Advocates for R-5/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 6257/2014 & CM APPLs. 15125-15126/2014, 15717/2014 SHERRY ARBELL D MARAK & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. R.S. Bobde and Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta, Advocates versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Advocates for R-1/DU. Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with M...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 26, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : September 29, 2014 + CRL.A. 1139/2014 PRADEEP Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate with Ms.Sumi Anand, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Charged for having murdered his wife in the room taken on rent by Mahender PW-2, the co-brother of the appellant in which room Mahender and his wife were staying with the appellant and his wife and their minor daughters, on May 15, 2011 around 10.00 P.M., vide impugned decision dated July 10, 2014, the appellant has been convicted and vide order on sentence dated July 14, 2014, he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.2. The incriminating evidence against the appellant held proved by the prosecution is :- (i) the recovery of the phawra Ex.P-1 at the instance of the a...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Goyal Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 4883/2014 & CM Nos. 9753/2014 & 9754/2014 RAKESH KUMAR GOYAL ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms Rachna, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Rajat Navet and Ms Sanya Talwar, Advocate for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns an order dated 21.07.2014 passed by the Executive Director (Retail Sales) of Indian Oil Corporation (hereafter IOC) whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner assailing an order dated 14.03.2014, terminating the dealership of the Petitioner, was rejected.2. Briefly stated the relevant facts are as under:- 2.1. On 01.02.2005, a Memorandum of Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement) was entered into between the Petitioner, IBP Co. Ltd (since merged with IOC) and Smt. Queenie Sharma for...
Tag this Judgment!Chetan and anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 24, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: September 29, 2014 % + CRL.A. 2/2000 CHETAN & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mrs.Meena Chaudhary Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Hiren Sharma, Adv. versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The appellants Chetan and Rohtas, the two brothers are convicted for the murder of Bhopal Singh punishable under Section 302/34 IPC and Chetan for Section 25 Arms Act as well by the impugned judgment dated September 18, 1999 and vide order dated September 28, 1999 they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `1000/each for offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC. Chetan has also been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of `5000/- for offence punishable under Section 25 Arms Act.2. Learned counsel ...
Tag this Judgment!Sherry Arbell D Marak and anr Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6251/2014 & CM APPLs. 15101-15102/2014, 15744/2014 GABY LALMUANPUII & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Ms. Indu Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikram Mehta, Ms. Suman Yadav and Mr. Gaurang Panandiker, Advocates versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI, FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Advocates for R-1/DU. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) for R-3/MAMC. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocate for R4/UOI. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Mr. Manan Khera, Advocates for R-5/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 6257/2014 & CM APPLs. 15125-15126/2014, 15717/2014 SHERRY ARBELL D MARAK & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. R.S. Bobde and Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta, Advocates versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Advocates for R-1/DU. Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with M...
Tag this Judgment!Man Mohan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 19, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : September 29, 2014 + CRL.A. 1010/2014 MAN MOHAN Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao and Ms.Srilina Rao, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP SI Somil Sharma, PS Nand Nagri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. At 5:40 PM on June 19, 2007 the duty officer at PS Nand Nagri noted information in daily diary No.21A, Ex.PW-13/A, that one Chiranji Lal residing at C-2/329, Nand Nagri has died and his elder son was accusing the younger son of the deceased to have murdered their father. Copy of DD No.21A was entrusted for investigation to ASI Sona Ram PW-13, who accompanied by Ct.Rajender Kumar PW-10 reached C-2/329, Nand Nagri. They met Ram Avtar PW-2, a son of the deceased, who told them that the appellant Manmohan was his younger brother and was involved in a civil litigat...
Tag this Judgment!Vijay NaraIn Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No.660 of 2008 Reserved on: September 25, 2014 Decision on: September 29, 2014 VIJAY NARAIN ...... Appellant Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Deswal, Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Sahil Paul, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2909.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 19 th July 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CC No.144/07/01 in the case arising out of FIR No.5 of 2001 registered at Police Station (PS) Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) convicting the Appellant, Vijay Narain, for the offence under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and also against the impugned order on sentence dated 25th July 2008 sentencing the Appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonm...
Tag this Judgment!