Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 8 of about 306 results (0.021 seconds)Gopal Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: August 22, 2014 + CRL.A. 48/2012 GOPAL CHAND Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Bir Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Narender Singh, P.S.Jyoti Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Sangita was married to Krishan, the younger brother of Gopal Chand - the appellant. She and her husband were residing at the house of Gopal Chand who was pressurising the two to vacate the house. Gopal Chands wife had expired in the year 2004, there are traces of evidence that he was wanting Sangita to satisfy the needs of his body as well. Sangita suffered burn injuries in her house at around 9.30 P.M. DD No.28-A, Ex.PW-13/A was recorded at 10.05 P.M. on September 28, 2010 at P.S.Jyoti Nagar that an informant through mobile phone No.9811749420 had informed that a lady was on fire at gali No.4, Shiv Mandir. The c...
Tag this Judgment!Chanderkant Verma Vs. State Thr. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.760 of 2010 Reserved on:30. h July 2014 Decision on:21. t August 2014 SHAKUN GROVER Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Mr. Pranav Proothi, Mr. Sarim Naved, Ms. Ria Singh Sawhney, Ms. Soumya Jha and Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate. WITH CRL.A. No.767 of 2010 CHANDERKANT VERMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Burman, Mr. Aditya Swarup Agarwal, Mr. Harsit Khurana, and Mr. Amritesh Raj, Advocates. versus STATE THR. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate. AND CRL.A. No.819 of 2010 SURYA PRATAP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Saket Singh, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel for CBI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2108.2014 Introduction 1. These three...
Tag this Judgment!Shakun Grover Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.760 of 2010 Reserved on:30. h July 2014 Decision on:21. t August 2014 SHAKUN GROVER Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Mr. Pranav Proothi, Mr. Sarim Naved, Ms. Ria Singh Sawhney, Ms. Soumya Jha and Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate. WITH CRL.A. No.767 of 2010 CHANDERKANT VERMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Burman, Mr. Aditya Swarup Agarwal, Mr. Harsit Khurana, and Mr. Amritesh Raj, Advocates. versus STATE THR. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate. AND CRL.A. No.819 of 2010 SURYA PRATAP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Saket Singh, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel for CBI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2108.2014 Introduction 1. These three...
Tag this Judgment!Afroz Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 22, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: August 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1120/2012 PRAVEEN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 468/2012 SIRI RAM @ PAPPU @ LATPATIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate with Mr. Mr.Vineet Hans, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 483/2012 SAMUAL MASSEY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 512/2012 SUNIL @ LILLY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Tanveer A.Mir, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP S...
Tag this Judgment!Praveen Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 22, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: August 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1120/2012 PRAVEEN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 468/2012 SIRI RAM @ PAPPU @ LATPATIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate with Mr. Mr.Vineet Hans, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 483/2012 SAMUAL MASSEY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 512/2012 SUNIL @ LILLY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Tanveer A.Mir, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP S...
Tag this Judgment!Samual Massey Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 22, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: August 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1120/2012 PRAVEEN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 468/2012 SIRI RAM @ PAPPU @ LATPATIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate with Mr. Mr.Vineet Hans, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 483/2012 SAMUAL MASSEY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 512/2012 SUNIL @ LILLY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Tanveer A.Mir, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP S...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil @ Lilly Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 22, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: August 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1120/2012 PRAVEEN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 468/2012 SIRI RAM @ PAPPU @ LATPATIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate with Mr. Mr.Vineet Hans, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 483/2012 SAMUAL MASSEY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 512/2012 SUNIL @ LILLY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Tanveer A.Mir, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP S...
Tag this Judgment!Siri Ram @ Pappu @ Latpatiya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 22, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: August 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1120/2012 PRAVEEN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 468/2012 SIRI RAM @ PAPPU @ LATPATIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate with Mr. Mr.Vineet Hans, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 483/2012 SAMUAL MASSEY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 512/2012 SUNIL @ LILLY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Tanveer A.Mir, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP S...
Tag this Judgment!Naik Rajendran R Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5800/2013 NAIK RAJENDRAN R Through: ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Central Government Standing Counsel for the UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER2108.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By the instant petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 19 th October 2012 passed by the learned Armed Force Tribunal thereby dismissing the O.A.No.5/2012 filed by the petitioner on the ground that there was an inordinate delay on the part of the petitioner.2. The facts of this case in brief are that the petitioner was enrolled as a Sepoy in the Army Medical Corps and he was dismissed from service after he was tried by Summary Court Martial. The petitioner had filed a statutory petition before the Chief of Army Staff against the findi...
Tag this Judgment!Pooran Singh @ VipIn Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 22, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: August 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1120/2012 PRAVEEN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 468/2012 SIRI RAM @ PAPPU @ LATPATIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate with Mr. Mr.Vineet Hans, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 483/2012 SAMUAL MASSEY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Sanjay Neolia (I.O.) and SI Naveen, PS Preet Vihar CRL.A. 512/2012 SUNIL @ LILLY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Tanveer A.Mir, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP S...
Tag this Judgment!