Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 4 of about 306 results (0.021 seconds)Mahesh Chand Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. 08.2014 + W.P.(C) 5436/2014, C.M. NOS. 10806-10808/2014 MAHESH CHAND ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Himanshu Chaubey and Sh. Ashwarya Sinha, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC, for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. Sh. Vardhman Kaushik, for Sh. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for Resp. No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. No.10806/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 5436/2014, C.M. NO.10807-10808/2014 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 28.05.2013 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in O.A. No.2328/2012. The CAT had rejected the petitioners application questioning the rejection of his representation. He was selected to the post of SO/Gr-I Stenographer in the limited departmental examination conducted, the W.P.(C) 5436/2014 Page 1 results o...
Tag this Judgment!Rahul Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 26, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Ms.Bhavita Modi, Advocate for Ravi Ms.Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae for Vinod @ Chottu Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate for Rahul CRL.A. 563/2014 RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla CRL.A. 726/2014 RAVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus...
Tag this Judgment!Shubh Arora and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3832/2014 SHUBH ARORA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Bora and Mr. Nikhil Ahuja, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. ASI Shri Ram PS Hari Ram. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. Nos. 13120-21/2014 (for exemption) Exemption applications, as prayed for, are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Both these applications are disposed off. Crl. M.C.3832/2014 & Crl. M.A.13119/2014 (for stay) 1. Issue notice.2. Counsel for the State accepts notice.3. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been moved by the petitioners seeking modification of order dated 20.08.2014 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts, in a case titled State versus Shubh Arora & Others in FIR No.350/2012 registered under 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Hari Nag...
Tag this Judgment!Rashda Siddiqui Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-viii, New Delhi and ors ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 08.2014 W.P.(C) 5560/2013 RASHDA SIDDIQUI Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VIII, NEW DELHI & ORS. ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Karthik Ashok. For the Respondents : Mr Balbir Singh and Mr Abhishek Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 25.03.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as the said Act).2. The only issue that is raised in this petition pertains to the Assessment Year 2006-07 and is with regard to a painting which was sold by the petitioner/assessee in the year ending 31.03.2006. The painting was sold by the petitioner/assessee for a sum of Rs.34 lacs. The painting had been acquired by the assessee prior to 01.04.1981 and, therefore, t...
Tag this Judgment!Swapnil Yadav @ Sonu Yadav Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3824/2014 SWAPNIL YADAV @ SONU YADAV ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M.L. Yadav and Mr. Lokesh Chander, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. Deepak Pathak and mr. Neeraj Grover, Advocates for Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.13106/2014 Exemption, a prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.3824/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.13105/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.65/2013, registered under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act (Amend) 2003 at police station Kapashera, and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground that the bill raised by the electricity company in this regard has been paid in full by the petitioner.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner Vs. T.G. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 26, 2014 + ITA4102014 COMMISSIONER Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel versus T.G. BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) impugns order dated 26.12.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, in short) in the case of T.G.Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. in relation to the assessment year 2009-10.2. The contention of Revenue as stated in the appeal is that the expenditure incurred by the respondent assessee of Rs.4,29,06,605/- on the Tivoli Holyday Village Project should have been capitalized. It is submitted that the project was at the initial stage and the expenditure should be treated as pre-operative expenditure. Reliance is placed on the fact that the assessee had agreed that the adve...
Tag this Judgment!Ravi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 26, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Ms.Bhavita Modi, Advocate for Ravi Ms.Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae for Vinod @ Chottu Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate for Rahul CRL.A. 563/2014 RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla CRL.A. 726/2014 RAVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod @ Chhotu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 26, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Ms.Bhavita Modi, Advocate for Ravi Ms.Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae for Vinod @ Chottu Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate for Rahul CRL.A. 563/2014 RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla CRL.A. 726/2014 RAVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Ravi Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 26, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Ms.Bhavita Modi, Advocate for Ravi Ms.Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae for Vinod @ Chottu Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate for Rahul CRL.A. 563/2014 RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla CRL.A. 726/2014 RAVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus...
Tag this Judgment!Pankaj Bhagat Vs. State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 488 of 2014 Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Decision on: August 25, 2014 RAJESH RISHI DEV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate. versus STATE (GNCT of DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. WITH CRL.A. 440 of 2014 PANKAJ BHAGAT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Ms. Pinky Dubey, Mr. Shiv Chopra, Mr. Pulkit Misra and Ms. Namita Wali, Advocates. versus STATE (GNCT of DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP with SI Jatinder Kumar, PS: Mahendra Park, Delhi. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2508.2014 1. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 2nd January 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) convicting the Appellants for the offence under Sections 363 read with Section 365 read with Section 34 IPC and additionally convicting Appellant Raj Rishi Dev (Accused No.1)[A-1]. for the offence under Section 368, as well as the order on sentence dated 1...
Tag this Judgment!