Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhoop Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:28. 07.2014 % W.P.(C.) No.789/2014 BHOOP SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rama Shanker, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Saqib, Adv. for R-1 Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Ravi Sikri with Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Ms. Sumedha Dang for MTNL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner challenges the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) dated 05.10.2012 passed in T.A. No.1392/2009, whereby the Tribunal rejected his application questioning the adjustment/recovery of ` 1,26,000/- from the terminal benefits admissible to him at the time of his superannuation with effect from 31.03.2004.2. Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner was originally an employee of the Department of Telecommunication (DOT), when the functioning of the DOT was reorganised and its employees...
Rajeev Tokas Vs. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h July, 2014. % + WP(C) No.6041/2001 MANOJ KUMAR MUDGAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Dwivedi for Mr. A.K. De, Advocate. Versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. AND WP(C) No.6042/2001 RAJEEV TOKAS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mr. Rajesh Dwivedi for Mr. A.K. De, Advocate. Versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Both petitions impugn the separate but identical Office Memorandums, both dated 10th July, 2001 of the respondent IIT, Delhi discontinuing the services of each of the petitioners as Swimming Coachcum -Life Guard in the respondent IIT with immediate effect. The petitions also seek the relief of reinstatement of each of the petitioners with all consequential benefits and regularization of the services of the pet...
Meera JaIn and anr. Vs. Sundari Devi Garg and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 28, 2014 + FAO(OS) 193/2014 MEERA JAIN & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Kapil Khosla, Advocate with appellants in person versus SUNDARI DEVI GARG & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Varun Nischal, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vikas Arora, Advocate for R-2 Respondents in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Late Sh.Banwari Lal Garg was the owner of house No.A-1/66, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi. He died intestate on February 19, 2008 and was survived by his wife Sundari Devi and three daughters named Meera, Sunita and Anita.2. The mother and the daughters recorded a memorandum of family settlement in writing on March 12, 2008 concerning how they would like the parties to inherit the house owned by the deceased. The recital and the terms of settlement are as under:AND WHEREAS to arrive at an amicable s...
Dhanvinder Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 28, 2014 + CRL.APPEAL NO.885/2011 DHANVINDER SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Holding that the statement Ex.PW-8/C made by Sonia before her death to Sh.Pramod Kumar PW-8, SDM P.S.Patel Nagar was truthful and without a blemish and accepting the same as Sonias dying declaration the learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted Dhanvinder Singh, husband of Sonia, for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. Holding further that the testimony of Mandeep Kaur, PW-1, Janak Singh PW-4 and Harish Kumar PW-13 was trustworthy, Dhanvinder Singh has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC.2. The verdict of guilt is as per decision dated March 11, 2011. Vide order on sentence dated March 16, 2011, Dhanv...
Ajay Panday Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1938/2011 AJAY PANDAY Through: ..... Petitioner Mrs.Rekha Palli and Ms.Ankita Patnaik, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 5421/2011 RAVINDER LAMBA Through: ..... Petitioner Mrs.Rekha Palli and Ms.Ankita Patnaik, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS Through: % ..... Respondents Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate. Date of Decision : July 28, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. Both the aforesaid writ petitions raise common questions of law. The first issue raised in these petitions is whether appointment to the rank of Sub Inspector (Exe) in the Central Industrial Security Force (for short CISF) by Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (for short LDCE) is appointment by promotion or by direct recruitment. The second issue which arises and which is an offshoot of the first issue is as to whether the Respondents...
Omaxe Limited Vs. Sh.Vikas Malhotra and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 28, 2014 + FAO(OS) 191/2014 OMAXE LIMITED Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Shalabh Singhal, Advocate versus SH.VIKAS MALHOTRA & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Manish Sharma, Advocate with Mr.M.P.Sahay, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Admitted case of the parties before the learned Arbitrator was that under a letter of allotment dated February 20, 2007 Omaxe allotted space No.01 and 02 on the ground floor to Vikas Malhotra and Vishal Malhotra indicating that its approximate super area would be 141.60 sq.meters. An addendum of even date recorded the terms of the allotment. The units to be allotted were in a building under construction named by Omaxe Wedding Mall Agra.2. As we would be noting hereinafter, the contract between the parties was more in the nature of an investment made by t...
Sh. Sohan Lal Gupta Vs. Sh. Nand Kishore
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC REV No.33/2012 28th July, 2014 % SH. SOHAN LAL GUPTA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate. VERSUS SH. NAND KISHORE Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Tamay Nagar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) + RC. REV. No.33/2012, C.M. Nos. 1263/2012 (for stay) & 1264/2012 (for additional documents) 1. This petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 3.11.2011 which has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has directed eviction from the tenanted premises being one shop no.2 forming part of property bearing Municipal no.1464 (new) (743/E old no.), Gurudwara Road, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi-110003.2. The case of the respondent/landlord was that he needed the suit shop/tenanted premises for o...
Kiran Vs. Sudesh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :09. 05.2014 Pronounced on :28. 07.2014 + CM(M) 352/2012 &CM APPLs. 5350/2012 and 5351/2012 KIRAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.R. Jolly, Adv. Versus SUDESH & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Sumita Hazarika and Ms. Ipsita Behuru, Advs. for R-1 to 4. Mr. Asish Nischal, Adv. for R5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This petition impugns an order dated 30th September, 2011 which dismissed the petitioners application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking dismissal of the suit filed by the respondents No.1 to 4. The latter had filed a suit seeking following declarations:(a) pass a decree declaring the plaintiffs being the legally wedded wife and children of the deceased Satpal, are the legal heirs of deceased Satpal and as such entitled to family pension and to compassionate appointment, gratuity and insurance amount and other benefits; and (b) pass such order and further relief as the Court deems fi...
Parteek Finance and Investment Company Private Lim Vs. ..............
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
$~31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co. Appl. (M) No.112/2014 IN THE MATTER OF PARTEEK FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR .Petitioners Through: Mr. Kunal Tandon, Advocate CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER % 28.07.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a first motion Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short Act) is in connection with a Scheme of Amalgamation (for short Scheme) of Parteek Finance and Investment Company Private Limited (hereinafter referred to a s Transferor/Applicant Company) with PI Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee/Non Applicant Company) and their respective shareholders and creditors. A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed ================================================== Co. Appl. (M) No.112 /2014 1 with the Application.2. The registered office of Transferor Company is situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Honble Court while the registered ...
Prof. Ram Prakash Vs. D N Srivastava and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. No.529 of 2012 (converted into Crl. A. No.___________of 2014) Reserved on: July 23, 2014 Decision on: July 28, 2014 PROF. RAM PRAKASH ..... Appellant-in-person. versus D N SRIVASTAVA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate with Respondents 1 and 2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2807.2014 1. The Petitioner Prof. Ram Prakash seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 1st June 2012 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-04 (South) [MM]., Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi, acquitting the Respondents of the offences under Section 500 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).2. Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondents raised a preliminary objection that the criminal leave petition was time-barred and that an application for condonation of delay ought to have been filed.3. It is seen that the impugned judgment of the learned trial Court is dated 1st June 2012. The Petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »