Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 4 of about 371 results (0.044 seconds)Union of India and ors. Vs. Ruby and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~28 TO37* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :30. 07.2014 + + + + + + + W.P.(C) 6539/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus NEHA KADAM W.P.(C) 6571/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SIDHARTH GUPTA W.P.(C) 6585/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus BHAGWAN SAHAI MEENA W.P.(C) 6789/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus AJAY KUMAR AND ORS. W.P.(C) 6792/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus RAHUL AND ANR. W.P.(C) 339/2014, C.M. No.666/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus RUBY AND ANR W.P.(C) 355/2014, C.M. NO.708/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus W.P.(C) 6505/2013 and connected cases ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Page 1 ANJALI + + + Respondent W.P.(C) 762/2014, C.M. NO.1528/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SHRUTI W.P.(C) 5106/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SONIA W.P.(C) 5192/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus VARSHA ..Petitioners Respo...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors. Vs. Neha Kadam
Court: Delhi
$~28 TO37* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :30. 07.2014 + + + + + + + W.P.(C) 6539/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus NEHA KADAM W.P.(C) 6571/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SIDHARTH GUPTA W.P.(C) 6585/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus BHAGWAN SAHAI MEENA W.P.(C) 6789/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus AJAY KUMAR AND ORS. W.P.(C) 6792/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus RAHUL AND ANR. W.P.(C) 339/2014, C.M. No.666/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus RUBY AND ANR W.P.(C) 355/2014, C.M. NO.708/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus W.P.(C) 6505/2013 and connected cases ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Page 1 ANJALI + + + Respondent W.P.(C) 762/2014, C.M. NO.1528/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SHRUTI W.P.(C) 5106/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SONIA W.P.(C) 5192/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus VARSHA ..Petitioners Respo...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors. Vs. Ajay Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~28 TO37* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :30. 07.2014 + + + + + + + W.P.(C) 6539/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus NEHA KADAM W.P.(C) 6571/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SIDHARTH GUPTA W.P.(C) 6585/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus BHAGWAN SAHAI MEENA W.P.(C) 6789/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus AJAY KUMAR AND ORS. W.P.(C) 6792/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus RAHUL AND ANR. W.P.(C) 339/2014, C.M. No.666/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus RUBY AND ANR W.P.(C) 355/2014, C.M. NO.708/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus W.P.(C) 6505/2013 and connected cases ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondent ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Respondents ..Petitioners Page 1 ANJALI + + + Respondent W.P.(C) 762/2014, C.M. NO.1528/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SHRUTI W.P.(C) 5106/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus SONIA W.P.(C) 5192/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus VARSHA ..Petitioners Respo...
Tag this Judgment!Akshay Bhardwaj and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3302/2014 AKSHAY BHARDWAJ & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A. 11422/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 3302/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.44/2012 registered under Sections 323/341/308/34 IPC dated 09.03.2012 at Police Station Kanjhawala, Delhi, at the instance of respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, who are the complainants, against all the petitioners, since the matter is stated to have been compromised between the parties in terms of a compromise deed dated 10.04.2014. A certified true copy of the said deed of compromise has also been annexed to this application.2. According to the FIR lodged, it appears that a quarre...
Tag this Judgment!Kunal Bagchi and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 30, 2014 + TEST CAS692013 Kunal Bagchi & Ors. Through ...Petitioners Mr.Gurmehar Sistani and Ms.Nayamat Sistani, Advs. Versus State Through ....Respondent Ms.Gursharan Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioners have preferred the present petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for grant of succession certificate of the assets Late Mrs. Anila Bagchi (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) who died on 14th March, 2011 at New Delhi.2. Petitioners are the children of the deceased. Petitioner No.1 is the son of the deceased with whom the deceased was stated to be living at the time of her death. Petitioner No.2 and 3 are daughters of the deceased and are living in USA and Oman, respectively. Both of daughters individually have authorized petitioner No.1 to institute the present petition on their behalf. The deceased was pr...
Tag this Judgment!Dsj Communications Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 934/ 2010 DSJ COMMUNICATIONS ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Gaurav Agarwal, Mr Neel Kamal Mishra and Mr Jatin Zaveri. For the Respondents : Mr Akshay Chandra and Mr Raman Kumar for R-1 to 3. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing and setting aside of a letter dated 21.01.2010 whereby the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) had communicated the decision of the EPCG Committee, taken on 12.11.2009, inter alia, rejecting the request of the petitioner for extension of period for fulfilling its export obligations and also inclusion of an alternate export product for the purpose. The said letter dated 21.01.2010 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) further infor...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Anil JaIn Vs. Shri Bhagwan Shankar Khanna
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:05. 05-2014 Date of Decision:30. 07.2014 + RC.REV. 133/2014 SHRI ANIL JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Dewan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K. Ahmed & Ms. Anupam Dhingra, Advs. versus SHRI BHAGWAN SHANKAR KHANNA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra & Mr. Amit Sanduja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This is a revision petition filed under proviso to Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act), challenging the final order dated 08.10.2013 passed by ARC-1 (Central), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (the impugned order) whereby the application of the petitioner/tenant seeking leave to defend was dismissed and an order of eviction was passed against him in Eviction Petition No.E-220/11. Background of the case 2. The respondent/landlord (landlord) sought eviction of the tenant from the suit property bearing No.2371, Chhipiwara Kalan, Delhi citing bona fide need for it. The lan...
Tag this Judgment!Vijaya Bank Vs. Epfo and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 1726/2012 & CM No.3811/2012 VIJAYA BANK ..... Petitioner versus EPFO AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Vaibhav Dang. For the Respondents : Mr Rajesh Manchanda with Mr Rajat Manchanda for EPFO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Bank seeking quashing of two prohibitory orders dated 20.01.2012, whereby the petitioner Bank was restrained by respondent nos.1 & 2 (hereinafter collectively referred to as EPFO) from delivering certain immovable properties (Industrial Plot Nos.44 & 45, Block-B, Sector 58, NOIDA), which the petitioner Bank had taken physical possession of under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI Act). The petitioner has ...
Tag this Judgment!Zaheer Mauritius Vs. Director of Income Tax (international Taxation)-i ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 1648/2013 & CM NO.3105/2013 ZAHEER MAURITIUS ..... Petitioner versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-II ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate Ms Rashmi Chopra and Ms Vriti Anand, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The writ petitioner under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius, challenges a ruling dated 21.03.2012 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned ruling) of the Authority for Advance Ruling, (hereinafter referred to as AAR) in A.A.R. No.1048 of 2011. By the impugned ruling, the AAR held that the entire gains on the sale of equity shares and Compulsorily Convertible De...
Tag this Judgment!Suk Charan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h July, 2014 + CRL.A. 1438/2012 SUK CHARAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Padam Kant Saxena, Ms. Aeshna Dahiya & Mr. Deepak Dahiya, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP SI Ashok Kumar, PS Dwarka South. % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 9th August, 2012 and order on sentence dated 14th August, 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.162/2011 arising out of FIR No.244/2011 u/s 352/393/307 IPC registered with PS Dwarka, South whereby the appellant was sentenced as under:(i) RI for a period of 4 years with fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offences punishable u/s.452 IPC. The convict shall undergo further RI for a period of one month in case of default in payment of fine. (ii) RI for a period of one month for the offence punishable u/s.352 IPC. (iii) RI for a p...
Tag this Judgment!