Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 18 of about 371 results (0.023 seconds)Ashwani Kumar Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3163/2014 ASHWANI KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar and Mr. R. K. Solanki, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain APP. SI Babu Lal, Vasant Kunj. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.10963/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. 3163/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.135/2012, dated 03.05.2012 registered under Section 498A/323/342/506 IPC at Police Station Vasant Kunj on the ground that the disputes between the petitioner and the complainant, who is arrayed as respondent No.2 has been settled. A copy of the Settlement Agreement that has been executed on 19.11.2013 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Court, Delhi between the petitioner and the second respondent, ...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3755/2013 RAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % 22.07.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 17th February, 2012 passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal whereby the learned Armed Forces Tribunal dismissed the OA filed by the petitioner on the ground that there was an inordinate delay on the part of the petitioner in challenging the order dated 23rd April, 2004 passed by the respondents.2. Addressing arguments in support of the present petition, Ms. Archana Ramesh, counsel for the petitioner has taken a stand that the case of the petitioner relates to grant of disability pension which he has claimed from the date ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. R. Jayashree Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :21. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 1710/2013 SMT. R. JAYASHREE ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. C. Hari Shankar and Sh. Jagdish. N., Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. R.V. Sinha, Sh. R.N. Singh and Sh. A.S. Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. This writ petitioner challenges the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 14.8.2012, which rejected her application O.A. 462/2012 and upheld her repatriation, by the second respondent, to Chennai. The petitioners grievance is that the CATs judgment focuses unduly on the question of maintenance of seniority consequent to transfer, an issue that she had conceded before the CAT, while the actual issue for consideration was the validity of her transfer to Chennai. The first respondent is the Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of F...
Tag this Judgment!Rajbir Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 16, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 21, 2014 % + CRL.A. 451/1998 ISHWAR SINGH & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.D.C.Mathur, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Ashish Jha, Mr.Amjad Hussain, Mr.Anupam Siddharth andMr.Paul Roy Paske, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Insp.S.K.Jha, ATO, P.S.Nangloi CRL.A. 477/1998 RAJBIR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Krishan Kumar, Advocate with Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Insp.S.K.Jha, ATO, P.S.Nangloi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Mange Rams daughter Sneh Lata was married to Rajbir on April 28, 1986. On the same day, Kusum Lata daughter of Suraj Bhan who is the brother of Mange Ram, was married to Rajbirs younger brother Mahavir. Ishwar Singh and Kasturi Dev...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1041/2010 Judgment Pronounced on 21st July, 2014 % SURESH CHAND Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J1 Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment dated 16.7.2009 and the order on sentence dated 31.7.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge by which the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.3,000/-, and in default of fine, simple imprisonment for another period of three months for the offence under Section 302 IPC.2. The appellant was married to one Ms.Madhu; out of the wedlock four children were born.3. The version of the prosecution as noticed by the trial court is that on 26.8.2006 at around 7:28 a.m. an information was received at the Police Station Ashok Vihar vide DD Nos.10A and 11A about the recovery of a dead body of...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Mohd Hasan and ors
Court: Delhi
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 440/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. versus MOHD HASAN & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER2107.2014 % 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the State we find no case made out to issue notice to the respondents in the criminal leave petition.2. The impugned decision dated May 08, 2014 is well considered.3. The deceased Shanno was married to accused No.3 Mohd.Imran @ Guddu on March 08, 2009. Accused No.1 Mohd.Hasan is the father of Mohd.Imran. Mohd.Zamil accused No.2 is the brother of Mohd.Imran.4. Shanno committed suicide on July 29, 2010, a fact not disputed in the appeal.5. The three accused faced trial for offence punishable under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC.6. Evidence has surfaced that the deceased was suffering from depression and was under treatment at IHBAS, Shahdara. She remained admitted at t...
Tag this Judgment!Rehan @ Gandhi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : July 15, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : July 21, 2014 + CRL.A. 107/2010 REHAN @ GANDHI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sidharth Agarwal with Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Rehan has been convicted for having murdered Ahsan Khan. According to the evidence, the incident was witnessed by Aamna Begum (PW-1), Ahsan Khans daughter Rehana (PW-3), Ahsan Khans son Irfan (PW-5), Shahid (PW-2) a tea vender having a tea shop near the place of the occurrence and Akbar Ali (PW-4) a passerby who knew Rehan.2. In the appeal, Rehan claims that Aamna Begum, Rehana, Irfan, Shahid, Akbhar Ali are not trustworthy and prays that their testimony should be discarded and he should be acquitted.3. Process of law was set into motion when DD No.21A (Ex.PW- 15/A) was recorded by t...
Tag this Judgment!Rehabilitation Ministry Employees Cooperative Hous Vs. G.R. Vasudev
Court: Delhi
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:21. 07.2014 % W.P.(C) 1418/2014 REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LT.D ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Arora, Advocate a/w the President of the Society versus G.R. VASUDEV ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tripal Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present writ petition challenges the order of the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal dated 24.09.2013 and the dismissal of the review by another order of 06.11.2013. The tribunal affirmed the award of the arbitrator dated 08.02.2009 made in the course of dispute referred to him under section 70 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner a Cooperative Society sought to proceed against the respondent, one of its members, Sh. G.R. Vasudev. It alleged that despite the existing resolutions which required payment of perio...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Singh Vs. the State and ors
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 237/2014 JAI SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Hirender Kumar and Mr.Dewan Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with ASI Mukhtyar Singh, PS Narela. Mr.Raghav Kapoor, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER2107.2014 % 1. By the present appeal, the appellant, father of the deceased Sheela challenges the judgment dated December 14, 2013 whereby respondent Nos.2 to 8 have been acquitted for offences under Section 304B/302 IPC and the order on sentence dated December 18, 2013 whereby on conviction of respondent No.2 Ashok Kumar for offence under Sections 498A/306 IPC, a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years has been awarded, which according to the appellant is an inadequate sentence.2. At the outset, it is to be noted that the remedy of an appeal available ...
Tag this Judgment!Gajender Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :21. t May, 2014 Date of decision:18. h July, 2014 + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.474/2011 GAJENDER Through ..... Appellant Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE Through Prosecutor. + ..... Respondents Mr. Rajat Katyal, Additional Public CRIMINAL APPEAL No.901/2011 RAMRATI ALIAS RAMA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Biswajeet Kumar Patra and Ms. Inderjeet Siddhu, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, Additional Public Prosecutor. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Gajender and Ramrati by the impugned judgment dated 4th August, 2010 stand convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). Gajender is also convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. The deceased, it is claimed, was one Prem Raj. Appellant Ramrati is widow of late Jai Prakash, brother of deceas...
Tag this Judgment!