Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 17 of about 371 results (0.021 seconds)Laxmi NaraIn Jai Gopal Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Ajay Aggarwal and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 50/2013 LAXMI NARAIN JAI GOPAL PVT LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Juneja, Advocate versus % AJAY AGGARWAL & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr.M.L. Mangla, Mr. Manish Singhal and Mr. Ankit Mangla, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER2307.2014 1. I am informed that pleadings in the matter are complete and admission / denial of documents has also taken place.2. I am further informed that original documents were produced at the time of admission / denial, though they were not placed on record. The parties are directed to have them placed on record.3. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the following issues can be framed:(i). Whether the plaintiffs are owners of the trademarks:GOPAL and GOPAL GOLD?. OPP (ii). Whether the plaintiffs, as claimed, are prior user of the trademarks GOPAL and GOPAL GOLD?. OPP (iii). Whether the plaintiffs have infringed the regist...
Tag this Judgment!Virender @ Mintu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 11 , 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 23 , 2014 % + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 4/2013 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini Versus SURENDER @ KALWA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shubham Asri, Advocate for (A-1) and (A-2) Mr.Pradeep Norula, Ms.Prerna Mehta and Ms.Urmila Verma, Advocates for (A-3) WITH + CRL.A. 1269/2013 VIRENDER @ MINTU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pradeep Norula, Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocates for (A-3) Versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini WITH + CRL.A. 1445/2013 & Crl.M.B. 2256/2013 SURENDER @ KALWA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Shubham Asri, Advocate for (A-1) and (A-2) Versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini CORAM: HON'BLE MR...
Tag this Judgment!Jitender Singh Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1332/2014 Reserved on :14.07.2014 Pronounced on :23.07.2014 % JITENDER SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Naina Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Saleem Ahmed, Standing Counsel for the State/R-1 with Ms.Charu Dalal, Adv. Mr.Anurag Jain and Mr.Veer Pal Singh, Advocates with R-2/ Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.Crl.M.A.No.10208/2014 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(Crl.) No.1332/2014 1. The Petitioner Jitender Singh is brother-in-law of RespondentNo.2 (who is the Complainant) against whom FIR No.394/2014 under Section 376 (2)(f) IPC has been registered at PS Prashant Vihar.2. The quashing of FIR No.394/2014, PS Prashant Vihar has been sought mainly on the ground that the Respondentno.2 has entered into a settlement with the Petitioner. An affida...
Tag this Judgment!Ravinder Chauhan Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 07.2014 Pronounced on:23. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 3663/2011, C.M. NO.13423/2011 & 14215/2013 RAVINDER CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Suman Chauhan and Sh. Jivesh Tiwari, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Vijay Nair and Sh. Rajat Joneja, Advocates. Sh. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate, for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. Sh. Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Aditi Gupta and Sh. Vardhmaan Kaushik, Advocates, for UPSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The Petitioner, an unsuccessful candidate for the post of Senior Scientific Officer Grade II (Ballistic) (hereafter referred to as "the W.P.(C) 3663/2011 Page 1 post") is aggrieved by the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 11.05.2011 in O.A. No.529/2011, repelling his challenge to the selection of the fourth respo...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. RafiuddIn @ Rafe
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 331/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. versus RAFIUDDIN @ RAFE Represented by: ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER2207.2014 % 1. The State seeks leave to appeal against judgment dated January 28, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the respondent Rafiuddin @ Rafe, husband of the deceased Gulfiza for charges under Sections 302/304B and 498A IPC.2. The prosecution case rests on the dying declaration made by the deceased and the testimony of her family members. An information was received by the PCR which was recorded vide DD No.4 at 1.30 AM on January 19, 2011 that a lady set herself on fire as Ex.PW-12/A. By the time PW-17 SI Mahipal Singh, the Chowki In-charge of Police Post Balli Maran reached House No.5062, Kucha Rehman. The victim who resided on the first floor had been shifted to JPN Hosp...
Tag this Judgment!Shobha JaIn and anr Vs. Govt of Nct Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3230/2011 SHOBHA JAIN & ANR Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Rashmi Singhla, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, APP. Inspector Pankaj Arora, P.S. Kamla Market. SI Rajnish Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA,J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.142/2005 dated 28.02.2005 registered under Section 406/420/120B IPC at Police Station Ashok Vihar, Delhi on the plea that the petitioner has settled with all the complainants and have paid their outstanding in full. The petitioner is stated to have been running a Chit Fund; and in connection with the same, several complaints were filed alleging that the amount due to the subscribers on maturity has not been paid; and that the directors of the company, including the petitioner, had absconded after closing their office. In the same connection, SLP (Crl.)...
Tag this Judgment!Mahender Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d July, 2014 % + LPA No.468/2014, CM No.11099/2014 (for direction), CM No.11100/2014 (for condonation of delay), CM No.11101/2014 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) & CM No.11102/2014 (for exemption). ROSHAN LAL & ORS. Through: .. Appellant Mr. K.C. Mittal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Neeraj Atri with Mr. Himanshu Kaushik and Ms. Sarika Jain, Advs. AND + LPA No.469/2014, CM No.11103/2014 (for direction), CM No.11104/2014 (for exemption), CM No.11105/2014 (for condonation of delay) & CM No.11106/2014 (for condonation of delay in re-filing). MAHENDER KUMAR & ORS. .. Appellants Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Neeraj Atri with Mr. Himanshu Kaushik and Ms. Sarika Jain, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 Both appeals impugn, i) the common order dated 5th November, 2012 of th...
Tag this Judgment!Comverse Networks Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income T ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 3588/2013 COMVERSE NETWORKS SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-XVI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr M.S.Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr Mayank Nagi, Ms Husnal Syali Nagi and Mr Harkunal Singh. For the Respondents : Mr Kamal Sawhney and Mr Sanjay Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the order dated 18.03.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) in respect of the assessment year 2003-04 is challenged. The petitioner also seeks the quashing of the notice dated 16.03.2010 issued under Section 163(2) of the said Act as also the order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax pursua...
Tag this Judgment!Ramanand Vs. the State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2959/2014 RAMANAND ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Adv. Through: versus THE STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P. K. Mishra, APP with respondent No.2 Ram Sewak. SI Devender, PS Chhawla. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.C.2959/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of FIR No.50/2013 dated 23rd February, 2013 registered under Section 304 A IPC at Police Station Chhawla and all emanating proceedings therefrom filed at the instance of the complainant/Ram Sewak, who is arrayed as respondent No.2 in this petition, against Ramanand, who is the owner of the plot, where the infant daughter aged about 5 years, of the second respondent/Ram Sewak, is stated to have drowned in a water tank located on the said property.2. Issue notice to the respondents.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. Charge-sheet is...
Tag this Judgment!Vikash and ors Vs. State and ors
Court: Delhi
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3172/2014 VIKASH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. C. P. Sharma, Adv. versus STATE & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P. K. Mishra, APP for State with SI Manmohan Yadav, PS Dabri Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Adv. for R-2-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that the FIR No.256/2014 under Section 427/452/323/506/34 IPC, stated to have been registered on 11th April, 2014 at PS Dabri and all proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed in view of Memorandum of Understanding arrived at between the parties concerned on 18th July, 2014.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for State, as well as counsel for respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, accept notice.4. At the time of incident, the second petitioner, namely, Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, was arrested the same evening and he was enlarged on bail by the court below on 13.04.2014 and continues to remain on bail.5. C...
Tag this Judgment!