Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 16 of about 371 results (0.019 seconds)Anil Gupta and anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :22.07.2014. Judgment delivered on :23.07.2014 CRL.M.C. 2042/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.6850/2014 + ANIL GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil K. Mittal and Mr. Sumit Chaudhary and Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Petitioners Anil Gupta and Naresh Gupta seek quashing of the FIR No.540/2009 registered at PS Jahangir Puri pursuant to which the charge-sheet has been filed against them under Sections 363/366/376(G)/34 of the IPC with the additional prayer that the order dated 31.10.2013 directing framing of charges against the petitioners also be quashed. 2 Record shows that on the complaint of Ansaro Khatun alleging that her daughter R aged 16 years had been kidnapped by two persons namely Niranjan and Sumit @ Santosh, FIR under Sections 363/366 read with Section 34 of the IPC had been registered. Investig...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. Hotz Industries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA2942014 Date of decision:23. d July, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus HOTZ INDUSTRIES LTD. Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Having heard learned counsel for the Revenue in this appeal against the order of the tribunal dated 25th October, 2013, quashing the order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) passed by the Commissioner, we are not inclined to interfere. We need not examine the issue whether the Commissioner was precluded from passing an order under Section 263 because disallowance under Section 14A made in the order under Section 143(3) was subject matter of first appeal as we have to hold that the order passed by the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Act dated 31st October, 2011, did not mee...
Tag this Judgment!Surender @ Kalwa and anr. Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 11 , 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 23 , 2014 % + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 4/2013 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini Versus SURENDER @ KALWA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shubham Asri, Advocate for (A-1) and (A-2) Mr.Pradeep Norula, Ms.Prerna Mehta and Ms.Urmila Verma, Advocates for (A-3) WITH + CRL.A. 1269/2013 VIRENDER @ MINTU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pradeep Norula, Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocates for (A-3) Versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini WITH + CRL.A. 1445/2013 & Crl.M.B. 2256/2013 SURENDER @ KALWA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Shubham Asri, Advocate for (A-1) and (A-2) Versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini CORAM: HON'BLE MR...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Sunil Kumar Gaur Vs. Upsc and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 07.2014 Pronounced on :23. 07.2014 + + + + + + + W.P.(C) 3895/2014, C.M. NO.7850/2014 SH. SUNIL KUMAR GAUR versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3903/2014, C.M. NO.7865/2014 SANJAY CHAWLA versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3904/2014, C.M. NO.7867/2014 OM LATA SINGH versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3905/2014, C.M. NO.7869/2014 SH. RAJESH SHARMA AND ANR. versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3924/2014, C.M. NO.7905/2014 SH. KULDEEP SINGH versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3862/2014, C.M. NO.7800/2014 MAMTA YADAV AND ORS. versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3876/2014, C.M. NO.7822/2014 HARISH KUMAR versus W.P.(C) 3895/2014 and connected matters ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner Page 1 UPSC AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate, f...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and anr Vs. Tapan Neeraj an ...
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 814/2014, C.M. NO.1633/2014 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (Civil), for DSSSB. versus TAPAN NEERAJ AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Padma Kumar. S., Ms. Tinu Bajwa, Sh. Amandeep Joshi and Sh. Sameer Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) claims to be aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 22.05.2013 in O.A. No.271/2012. The impugned order had directed the appointment of the respondent (hereafter called the candidate) against vacancies that existed in the department. The concerned department which had declared the W.P.(C) 814/2014 Page 1 vacancies and in respect of whose posts the appointments ...
Tag this Judgment!Cenext Consulting and Investment Private Limited and a Vs. .......
Court: Delhi
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 614 /2013 CENEXT CONSULTING & INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED & ..... Petitioner ANR Through: Mr. Kunal Juneja, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Atma Sah, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER23.07.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This second motion joint Petition has been filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) seeking sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement (Scheme) of Cenext Consulting & Investment Private Limited (Demerged Company) and Cenext Investment & Services Private Limited (Resulting Company) (Collectively referred as the Petitioner Companies). A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the petition. ================================================ CO.PET. 614 /2013 1 2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.3. The details of respective dates of in...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Surender @ Kalwa and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 11 , 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 23 , 2014 % + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 4/2013 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini Versus SURENDER @ KALWA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shubham Asri, Advocate for (A-1) and (A-2) Mr.Pradeep Norula, Ms.Prerna Mehta and Ms.Urmila Verma, Advocates for (A-3) WITH + CRL.A. 1269/2013 VIRENDER @ MINTU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pradeep Norula, Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocates for (A-3) Versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini WITH + CRL.A. 1445/2013 & Crl.M.B. 2256/2013 SURENDER @ KALWA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Shubham Asri, Advocate for (A-1) and (A-2) Versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini CORAM: HON'BLE MR...
Tag this Judgment!Rekha Rani Vs. G.R.Kashyap
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) 1139/2013 23rd July , 2014 REKHA RANI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Raina, Advocate and Mr. Satish Sansi, Advocate. VERSUS G.R.KASHYAP Through: ...... Respondent Mr. S.S.Dahiya and Mr. L.K.Dahiya, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed impugning the three orders as per the heading of the petition. These three orders are: orders dated 22.11.2011 and 10.4.2012 passed by the trial court, and the order dated 24.12.2011 passed by the first appellate court withdrawing the appeal filed against the order dated 22.11.2011 on the ground that review petition will be filed.2. At the outset, I must state that one petition cannot be filed with respect to separate orders of separate courts, and which orders are not orders in a sequence of challenge to one basic order. Also, the order of the f...
Tag this Judgment!Krishan Kumar and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:23. 07.2014 % W.P.(C) 1120/2007 KRISHAN KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kr Sharma, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. for R1 to R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/Tribunal) dated 29.10.2003 in O.A. No.324/2003. The impugned order set aside the selection and appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (C&W) Grade-II.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were earlier working as Artisan Grade I, which is one of the posts-incumbents whereof are entitled to compete for 25% quota for the post of Train Examiner/JE Grade II. This was in term of Rule 142 of the Indian Railways Establishment Management (IRD) Volume I.3. The Northern Railway, on 11.11.2002 advertised 18 posts of JE (C&W...
Tag this Judgment!Santosh Pal Meena Vs. Upsc and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 07.2014 Pronounced on :23. 07.2014 + + + + + W.P.(C) 3894/2014, C.M. NO.7848/2014 SANTOSH PAL MEENA versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3895/2014, C.M. NO.7850/2014 SH. SUNIL KUMAR GAUR versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3903/2014, C.M. NO.7865/2014 SANJAY CHAWLA versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3904/2014, C.M. NO.7867/2014 OM LATA SINGH versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3905/2014, C.M. NO.7869/2014 SH. RAJESH SHARMA AND ANR. versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C)3894/2014 AND CONNECTED MATTERS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents\ ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents Page 1 + + + W.P.(C) 3924/2014, C.M. NO.7905/2014 SH. KULDEEP SINGH versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3862/2014, C.M. NO.7800/2014 MAMTA YADAV AND ORS. versus UPSC AND ORS. W.P.(C) 3876/2014, C.M. NO.7822/2014 HARISH KUMAR versus UPSC AND ORS. ..... Petitioner ..... Respond...
Tag this Judgment!