Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 10 of about 371 results (0.042 seconds)Union of India and ors. Vs. Shyam Sunder
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :28. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 1083/2014, CM APPL.2257/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus SHYAM SUNDER ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 3409/2014, CM APPL.7020/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners versus ARUN KUMAR ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Spl. Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocates for petitioners in both cases. Mr. S.K. Gupta with Mr. N.N.S. Rana, Advocates for respondents in both cases. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Northern Railway through Union of India has approached this Court claiming to be aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter the Tribunal) dated 15.01.2013 in OA35462009 and 3547/2009. W.P.(C) 1083/2014 & 3409/2014 Page 1 2. The brief facts are that the applicants/respondents were holders of various feeder cadre posts such as Fitter Grade-III etc; they wer...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Kumar Shah Propreitor M/S. Jay Bharat Ste Vs. Smt. Malti Nara ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV. 290/2013 28th July , 2014 % NARENDER KUMAR SHAH PROPREITOR M/S. JAY BHARAT STEELS ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocate VERSUS SMT. MALTI NARANG & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms. Anupama Kaul, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 30.4.2013 by which the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant has been dismissed and the eviction petition filed for bona fide necessity has been decreed with respect to the premises bearing municipal No.223, ground floor, ward No.8, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi 110006.2. The facts of the case are that respondents/landladies are the daughters of late Smt...
Tag this Judgment!Umesh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
I~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :28. h July, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 752/2014 UMESH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sumit Sarna, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State. PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No.58/2014 registered at Police Station Baba Haridas Nagar under Sections 147/149/323/354/506/34 IPC & Section 3(10), 3(11) SC/ST Act.2. Notice of the anticipatory bail application was given to the State. The State has taken the plea that since allegations for committing the offence punishable under Sections 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act have also been made against the Petitioner, he cannot be enlarged on anticipatory bail.3. State was directed to file the status report and in the meantime, protection was granted to the Petitioner by directing that no coercive action be taken against the Petitioner subject to his joining the investigation as and when dire...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors. Vs. Arun Kumar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :28. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 1083/2014, CM APPL.2257/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus SHYAM SUNDER ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 3409/2014, CM APPL.7020/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners versus ARUN KUMAR ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Spl. Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocates for petitioners in both cases. Mr. S.K. Gupta with Mr. N.N.S. Rana, Advocates for respondents in both cases. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Northern Railway through Union of India has approached this Court claiming to be aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter the Tribunal) dated 15.01.2013 in OA35462009 and 3547/2009. W.P.(C) 1083/2014 & 3409/2014 Page 1 2. The brief facts are that the applicants/respondents were holders of various feeder cadre posts such as Fitter Grade-III etc; they wer...
Tag this Judgment!Devki Nandan and anr. Vs. Ravi Kant
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV. No.423/2011 28th July, 2014 % DEVKI NANDAN & ANR. Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Rahul Rohtagi and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocates. VERSUS RAVI KANT Through: ...... Respondent Mr. B.L.Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 25(B)(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the Act) is filed challenging the impugned judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 5.5.2011 by which the Additional Rent Controller has after trial decreed the eviction petition for bona fide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act in favour of the respondent herein/landlord and against the petitioners/tenants with respect to first floor and second floor of the property bearing No.387(386-D), Bagh Kare Khan, Delhi. RCR4232011 tenanted premises comprises of two rooms, kitchen, latrine and bathroom as shown in red colour in the site plan at...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Indian Delco Pvt Ltd and ors. Vs. Chairman and Managing Director ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h July, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3690/2014 M/S. INDIAN DELCO PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Muneesh Malhotra and Mr. Vikram V. Minhas, Advocates. versus CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vijay Kumar and Ms. Rekha Anand, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) M/s Indian Delco Pvt. Ltd. has filed this writ petition impugning order dated 5th March, 2014 passed by the Chairman, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi-I (Appellate Tribunal for short). It is submitted that the Chairman, Appellate Tribunal has incorrectly held that there was a concession and waiver of jurisdiction and, therefore, the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi-II (DRT-II), was legal and valid. Secondly, on merits, it is submitted that there were errors and mistake...
Tag this Judgment!Tpf Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Vandana Goyal and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: July 28, 2014 I.A. Nos.7936/2014 in CS(OS) No.922/2014 TPF TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.C.M.Lall, Adv. with Ms.Nancy Roy, Mr.Vinod Rai, Mr.Subhash Bhutoria & Mr.Anuj Nair, Advs. versus VANDANA GOYAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through Ms.Pratibha M. Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sahil Sethi & Ms.Suhasini Raina, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs, TPF Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Moong Labs Technologies Pvt. Ltd. have filed the present suit for damages and permanent injunction, against the three defendants, namely, Ms.Vandana Goyal, Mr.Mohit Garg and Lolz Studio. The suit as well as the interim application was listed before Court on 31st March, 2014 when the interim order was passed in the presence of the learned counsel for the defendants. Relevant paras 4 & 9 of the said order read as under:4. It is the case of the plaintiffs that defendant no.1 was in the empl...
Tag this Judgment!Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. Vishal Sharma and Ano ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: July 28, 2014 CS(OS) No.2506/2012 & I.A.No.10060/2013 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. .....Plaintiff Through Mr.Neeraj Kumar, Advocate versus VISHAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER Through None ..Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit for recovery under Order XXXVII CPC filed by the plaintiff against the defendants.2. The matter was placed before this Court by the learned Joint Registrar recording that till date neither appearance has been filed nor any one has been appearing for the defendants No.1 and 2 despite their having been served of the summons in the prescribed form under Order 37 CPC on 9th December, 2012 and 13th December, 2012 respectively. However, on 17th December, 2012 an application being I.A.No.10060/2013 for appearance was filed by the defendant no.1 and hence an application being I.A.No.10555/2013 under Order XXXVII Rule 3(4) CPC was filed by the...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Chhabra Vs. Indian Bank and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h July, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.5197/2001 ASHOK KUMAR CHHABRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagat Arora & Mr. Rajat Arora, Advs. Versus INDIAN BANK & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vaibhav Kalra & Mr. Deepak Yadav, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 9th March, 2000 of the Disciplinary Authority of the respondent Bank imposing upon the petitioner major penalty of dismissal from service in terms of Regulation 4(j) of Indian Bank Officer Employees (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976. The petitioner also seeks the relief of reinstatement with all consequential benefits.2. Notice of the petition and the application for interim relief were issued though no interim relief granted. Rule was issued in the writ petition on 26th July, 2002 and the application for interim relief dismissed. The petitioner was permitted to file ad...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 4664/2014, C.M. NO.9307/2014 & 9308/2014 AJAY KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Amandeep Joshi and Sh. Sameer, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Saqib, Advocate, for Resp. Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The present petition has been preferred against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 19.03.2014 in O.A. No.2825/2012. The CAT rejected the application of the writ petitioners claiming that they should be appointed to one of the Group-C/D posts in the Government of India Press.2. The facts necessary for deciding this case are that some time in November 2007, the third respondent issued an advertisement in the newspaper inviting applications for filling-up Group-C/D posts. Pursuant to this, the selection p...
Tag this Judgment!