Delhi Court June 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 2 of about 16 results (0.018 seconds)M/S National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S R.N. Shetty and Compa ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: June 09, 2014 + O.M.P. No.249/2014 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through Ms.Preeti Mechan, Adv. versus M/S R.N SHETTY & COMPANY ..... Respondent Through Mr.T.S.Doabia, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sharan Thakur, Mr.Siddhartha Barua, Ms.Natasha Thakur & Mr.Siddharth Thakur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), arising from the Arbitral Award (Majority) dated 13th November, 2013.2. The petitioner NHAI and respondent/contractor, M/s. R.N. Shetty & Company, joint venture with Sunway Construction BHD entered into a Contract Agreement dated 28th February, 2002 for a sum of Rs.204.84 crores for the work of four laning and strengthening of 433 km to 495 km of Dharwad-Belgaum section of NH-4 in the State of Karnataka. As per the terms of agree...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Prakash and Others Vs. Govt.of Nct of Delhi, New Delhi and Another
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
(Oral). P.K. Basu, Member (Administrative):- 1. MA.1738/2014 filed under Rule 4 (5) (a) of the C.A.T. (Procedure), Rules, 1987, for joining together is allowed. 2. In the present original application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants have sought issuance of directions to the respondents to formulate the policy to regularize their services in view of the judgments of the Honble High Court and Honble Supreme Court and further by considering the decisions of the other States, which have regularized the services of the contractual employees. 3. Learned counsel for applicants submitted that the respondents appointed the applicants as Staff Nurse (Male/Female) in various Hospitals, Health Establishments, under the Respondent No.1, managed though its Health and Family Welfare Department/ Respondent No.2, on contract basis and have been continuing them in such capacity for quite long. According to him, the initial appointment of the applicants was...
Tag this Judgment!isco Track Sleepers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on : June 04, 2014 + O.M.P. 704/2013 ISCO TRACK SLEEPERS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sanghi & Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate With Mr. Dinesh Pardasani, Ms. Isha J Kumar & Ms. Sneha, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Adv. for R-2 + O.M.P. 702/2013 PATIL RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sanghi & Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Pardasani, Ms. Isha J Kumar & Ms. Sneha, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.OMP No.704/2013 1. The petitioner has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking the following reliefs: (a) Pass ...
Tag this Judgment!Yogesh JaIn and ors. Vs. Rakesh JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: June 04, 2014 + O.M.P. 455/2012 YOGESH JAIN & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.S.C.Ladi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Deeksha L. Kakar and Mr.Rajesh Jain, Advs. versus RAKESH JAIN & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr.Vijay Hansaria, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhimanyu Garg, Adv. O.M.P. 688/2012 APOORVE JAIN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.S.C.Ladi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Deeksha L. Kakar and Mr.Rajesh Jain, Advs. versus RAKESH JAIN & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Vijay Hansaria, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhimanyu Garg, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner in both OMPs i.e. Yogesh Jain, Preeti Jain and Apoorve Jain have challenged the interim Award dated 1st April, 2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator who is related to both parties. The objections are filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. Signed copy of the Award was allegedly sent to the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Apoorve JaIn Vs. Rakesh JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: June 04, 2014 + O.M.P. 455/2012 YOGESH JAIN & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.S.C.Ladi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Deeksha L. Kakar and Mr.Rajesh Jain, Advs. versus RAKESH JAIN & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr.Vijay Hansaria, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhimanyu Garg, Adv. O.M.P. 688/2012 APOORVE JAIN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.S.C.Ladi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Deeksha L. Kakar and Mr.Rajesh Jain, Advs. versus RAKESH JAIN & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Vijay Hansaria, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhimanyu Garg, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner in both OMPs i.e. Yogesh Jain, Preeti Jain and Apoorve Jain have challenged the interim Award dated 1st April, 2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator who is related to both parties. The objections are filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. Signed copy of the Award was allegedly sent to the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pv ...
Court: Delhi
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on : June 04, 2014 + O.M.P. 704/2013 ISCO TRACK SLEEPERS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sanghi & Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate With Mr. Dinesh Pardasani, Ms. Isha J Kumar & Ms. Sneha, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Adv. for R-2 + O.M.P. 702/2013 PATIL RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sanghi & Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Pardasani, Ms. Isha J Kumar & Ms. Sneha, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.OMP No.704/2013 1. The petitioner has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking the following reliefs: (a) Pass ...
Tag this Judgment!