Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Gm Modular Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Havells India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: May 29, 2014 I.A. No.10946/2014 in CS(OS) No.1720/2014 M/S GM MODULAR PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.S.K.Bansal, Mr.Ajay Amitabh Suman & Mr.Vikas Khera, Advs. versus M/S HAVELLS INDIA LTD Through ..... Defendant Mrs.Prathiba M.Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sudeep Chatterjee, Ms.Bitika Sharma & Ms.Deepthi Mary Alexander, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.I.A. No.10947/2014 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.10948/2014 (u/s 149 r/w Sec.151 CPC) Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the Court fee would be filed within one week. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff, the application is disposed of. CS(OS) No.1720/2014 & I.A. No.10946/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.2. Issue summons in the suit and notice in the application to th...
Sohan Pal Vs. State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)1672/2010 % Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2014 SOHAN PAL ..... Petitioner versus STATE AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Vineet Chadha For the Respondents : Mr Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. This is a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein prayer is made for directing the respondents to produce the minor daughter of the petitioner from their illegal custody and detention and to hand over the custody of the said minor child to him. Further, prayer is made for issuance of a writ of Mandamus declaring the acts of the respondents in detaining Neelam i.e. wife of the petitioner in Nirmal Chhaya as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and a direction is also sought for imposing damages on the respondents and to award the same by way of compe...
Trans Asia Industries Exposition Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anu Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h May, 2014 % + FAO(OS) No.265/2014 TRANS ASIA INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Ashish Batra, Mr. Honey Jain, Advs. Versus IQUBAL CHAND MALHOTRA Through: None. .. Respondent AND + FAO(OS) No.266/2014 TRANS ASIA INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Ashish Batra, Mr. Honey Jain, Advs. Versus ANU MALHOTRA Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW .. Respondent RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These intra-court appeals impugn the consolidated order dated 03.04.2014 on identical applications under Order XXXIX Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in identical suits being CS(OS) No.1768/2013 and CS(OS) No.1769/2013 filed by the respondent / plaintiff in each of the appeals against the appellant / defendant. Vide the impugned order, the learned Single Judge...
Smt. Rama Mehta Vs. Delhi Union of Journalist Co-op. Group Housing Soc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 05.2014 + CM(M) 1387/2013 SMT. RAMA MEHTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Hitender Kapur, Adv. Versus DELHI UNION OF JOURNALIST CO-OP. GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This petition impugns an order dated 08.11.2013 which rejected the petitioners application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking dismissal of the suit. The suit was filed by the respondent-plaintiff seeking a decree for permanent injunction restraining the petitionerdefendant, her associates, agents etc. from interfering in the peaceful possession of a flat in the respondents Cooperative Group Housing Society bearing No.A-6 allegedly allotted to the petitioner by the person who is claimed to have been the then President.2. The petitioner claims to have become a member of the respondent Society on 14.06.1988 and was allotted flat No.A-6 on 13...
Trans Asia Industries Exposition Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Iqubal Chand Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h May, 2014 % + FAO(OS) No.265/2014 TRANS ASIA INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Ashish Batra, Mr. Honey Jain, Advs. Versus IQUBAL CHAND MALHOTRA Through: None. .. Respondent AND + FAO(OS) No.266/2014 TRANS ASIA INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Ashish Batra, Mr. Honey Jain, Advs. Versus ANU MALHOTRA Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW .. Respondent RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These intra-court appeals impugn the consolidated order dated 03.04.2014 on identical applications under Order XXXIX Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in identical suits being CS(OS) No.1768/2013 and CS(OS) No.1769/2013 filed by the respondent / plaintiff in each of the appeals against the appellant / defendant. Vide the impugned order, the learned Single Judge...
Pawan Kumar JaIn Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2014 W.P.(C) 1797/2008 PAWAN KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Dr Rakesh Gupta, Advocate with Ms Poonam Ahuja and Mr Rishabh Kapoor, Advocates For the Respondents : Ms Sonia Mathur, Advocate for UOI Mr Rohit Madan, Advocate for CIT CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition the petitioner has made the following prayers:- WP(C) 1797/2008 (a) Declare the provisions of the Taxation Laws (Amendment Act, 2005 insofar as it relates to the retrospective amendments of section 28 and 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act, (Annexure No.1) as ultra vires the Constitution and liable to be struck down; and (b) Declare that the CBDT circular No.2 of 2002 unauthorised by insofar it relates to the levy of tax retrospectively on taxpayers by denying the legit...
Shri Dinesh Chadha Vs. M/S Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:29. h May 2014 + CS (OS) No.225 of 2009 SHRI DINESH CHADHA .... Plaintiff Through Ms.Nandini Sahni, Advocate Versus M/s HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. .... Defendant Through Mr. Mohit Choudhary, Mr.Imraan and Ms.Damini Chawla, Advocates for D1 & D-3 Mr.Nitesh Jain and Mr.Sugam Seth, Advocates for D-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking relief of declaration and damages. As per the plaint the plaintiff was employed by defendant No.1 in its hotel, namely, Hotel Ramada Plaza at the post of General Manager vide contract letter dated 10.10.2007. Defendant No.2 is said to be a director of defendant No.1. Defendant No.3 is the younger brother of defendant No.2 who is said to have taken over the control of defendant No.1 with effect from 14.01.2009.2. It is averred that the plaintiff officially joined the Hotel on 15.11.2007 at the post of General Manager and ...
Meenakshi College of Pharmacy and Research Centre Vs. All India Counci ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h May, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.3244/2014 MEENAKSHI COLLEGE OF PHARMACY & RESEARCH CENTRE .. Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION .. Respondent Through: Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks, i) quashing of Regulations 4&5 of the All India Council for Technical Education (Grant of Approvals for the Technical Institutions) Regulations, 2012 as ultra vires Sections 10 & 11 of the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 (AICTE), as well as Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India; ii) quashing of order dated 30.04.2014 of the respondent AICTE; iii) a writ of mandamus directing the respondent AICTE to grant approval to the petitioner for conducting Diploma in Pharmacy with intake of 180 ...
Harsh Vardhan Mall Vishen Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1495/2014 & CM APPL. 3120/2014 HARSH VARDHAN MALL VISHEN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Ray, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-1 to 3. Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Advocate for R-4/BCI. Reserved on :15. h May, 2014 Date of Decision :29. h May, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayers:(a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 1-3 to permit the Petitioner to appear for all the subject-examinations of Semester I Examinations (First Year, LL.B. Course) either in Semester III Examinations (Second Year) or Semester V (Third Year) or split across the latter two semesters, and make up for shortfall in attendance during those semesters. (b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 1-3 to permit the Petitioner to attend all classes and lectures in the ongoin...
Progetto Grano S.P.A. Vs. Shri Lal Mahal Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:29. h May 2014 + Ex.P. No.52/2012 PROGETTO GRANO S.P.A. Through .....Decree Holder Mr.Jayant Mehta, Advocate. versus SHRI LAL MAHAL LIMITED .....Judgment Debtor Through Mr.Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sanjay Jain, Ms.Rachna Golchha and Mr.Vishrut Raj, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present petition is filed by the decree holder under Section 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 1996 Act) for enforcement/execution of the Foreign Awards being Appeal Award No.3782 and Appeal Award No.3783 both dated 21.09.1998 passed by the Board of Appeal of the Grain and Feed Trade Association (GAFTA), London. By a contract dated 12.05.1994 between Shivnath Rai Harnarain (India) Company (Sellers) (now succeeded by the judgment debtor) and Italgrani Spa, Naples, Italy (Buyers) (now succeeded by the decree holder) a transaction for sale of 20,000 MT...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »