Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 12 of about 438 results (0.016 seconds)Parvinder Singh Sawhney Vs. the Talagang Group Housing Cooperative Soc ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 05.2014 W.P.(C) 3449/2014 PARVINDER SINGH SAWHNEY ... Petitioner versus THE TALAGANG GROUP HOUSING COOPERATIVE SOCIETY & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.2 : Mr Manoj Kumar Garg : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Mr Hem Kumar CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 31.03.2014 passed by the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal in Appeal No.7/2014. The said appeal was directed against the order dated 01.12.2011 passed by the respondent No.2, whereby the allotment of a flat in the respondent No.1 society, insofar as the petitioner was concerned, was cancelled.2. We may point out that the order dated 01.12.2011 was the subject matter of a writ petition being WP(C) 3890/2012, which was disposed of on 23.07.2012. That writ petition was disposed of...
Tag this Judgment!Rohtash Singh Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On: May 20, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: May 26, 2014 % + WP(C) 3932/2000 ROHTASH SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate versus UOI & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Writ petitioner challenges the order dated July 30, 1999 holding the petitioner guilty of two of the three charges framed against him and inflicting punishment of dismissal from service. The statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected vide order dated December 11, 1999. Though the same has not been challenged we treat the same to be challenged in present writ petition.2. The petitioner was enrolled as a Constable in the BSF and was attached to the 18th Battalion which was, inter-alia, responsible to guard the Border Outpost (BOP) P.J.Nagar at the Indo-Bangl...
Tag this Judgment!Jyoti Sharma Vs. Kunal Khanna
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
N.P. Kaushik, Member (Judicial): 1.This appeal by the OP of case No. 66 of 2012 titled as Kunal Khanna vs. Jyoti Sharma is directed against the order dated 23rdOct., 2013 passed by District Forum (Central), Kashmiri Gate vide which the OP was directed to pay Rs.29,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of receipt of Rs.22,000/- i.e. 10.6.2011 till realization. The OP was also directed to pay to complainant Rs.15,000/- for harassment, pain and mental agony and Rs.5,000/- as costs of litigation . 2. In brief the complainant who happened to be a student of 20 years of age approached the OP Ms. Jyoti Sharma for career development after being allured by an advertisement given by her. Ms. Jyoti Sharma was running a training institute in the name of Sunrise Training Institute at House No.51/20, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi. A job, after requisite training, was also assured. 30% of the salary from his job was to be paid to the OP till the complainant remains in job. 3. Admittedly the com...
Tag this Judgment!Sushil Vashistha Vs. Union of India Through Its Defence Secretary Sout ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Ashok Kumar, Member (A): 1. The OA has been filed against the denial of grant of replacement scale of pay to the applicant at the time of recruitment/appointment in the entry grade of Telecom Mechanic (Highly Skilled Grade-I, HS-I vide orders dated 29.12.1989/19.03.1990 read with orders dated 24.09.1987, 13.11.1987 and appointment letter dated 2.12.1987 annexed as Annexure A-I (colly), and the decision on the second representation dated 24.4.2012 (Annexure A-I) colly. 2. The following reliefs have been sought in the OA:- 8.1. To interpret and clarify Ann. A-3, A-4 and A-4 (a) with a suitable direction to the respondents to grant revised pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300/- as per 4th CPC as was granted to other similarly situated junior in rank 3 officers; 8.2. To further direct to grant the arrears of pay from the date of entry i.e. 03.12.1987 as granted to other 3 officers including the juniors in whose respect the pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300/- has already been granted w.e.f. 1.1.1986; 8.3. T...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Kumar, Baghpat (Up). Vs. Union of India Through the General Mana ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
(Oral). G. George Paracken, Member (J). 1. The applicant has filed this Original Application against the rejection of his candidature by respondent No.2 for appointment to Group D post in Railways in terms of the Employment Notification No.220-E/Open Market/2012 dated 30.12.2012, without passing any order or without assigning any reason. 2. The respondents have filed their reply opposing this Original Application. 3. Today, when the case was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for respondent No.2 has produced the original OMR sheet of the Applicant in which he has left the Centre Code and the Control Number unmarked. He has submitted that without the aforesaid information, the computer could not accept the applicants data and, therefore, his case could not be processed further. He has also shown the original OMR sheet to the learned counsel for the Applicant. 4. In view of the above position, we do not find any merit in this case and it s dismissed. There shall be no order ...
Tag this Judgment!Shiv Narayan Vs. Department of Personnel and Training and anr
Court: Delhi
$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7757/2012 % Date of decision:26. h May, 2014 SHIV NARAYAN Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Shanker Raju, Adv. with Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Adv. versus DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner assails an order dated 26th July, 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting the Original Application No.638/2012. The petitioner had sought the following reliefs in his application:(i) Issue appropriate direction to the respondent to restore the service allocation and offer of appointment of the applicant and allocate I.A.S in Civil Service Examination 2010, on the same rank, position, seniority and consequential benefits arising therein as he would have got as per his original allocation and allow him to join ongoing Phase-1 training for those candidate...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjeev Bhatiani Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
15 to 22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.6643/2013, 6644/2013, 6646/2013, 6647/2013, 6648/2013, 6649/2013, 6655/2013 and 6584/2013. Decided on :26. 05.2014 IN THE MATTERS OF SANJEEV BHATIANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for Respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Advocate for R-2/DCB. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. By this common order, the Court proposes to dispose of eight petitions filed by the same petitioner against the respondent No.1/Union of India (UOI) and the respondent No.2/Delhi Cantonment Board (DCB), in respect of the same property, seeking the same relief.2. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioner in respect of premises bearing No.III/1/2E, Shastri Bazar, situated in the Delhi Cantonment area praying inter alia that the orders passed by the respondent No.2/DCB on different dates in respect ...
Tag this Judgment!Aniruddha Bahal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: May 26, 2014 +1. CRL.REV.P. 683/2012 ANIRUDDHA BAHAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr. Shiv Pande, Mr. Shiv Chopra, Mr. Nishank Mattoo & Mr. Hemant Shah, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K.Sharma, St. Counsel with Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Ms. Somi Mehra, Ms. Renu Malik & Mr.Pulkit Mishra, Advocates +2. CRL.REV.P. 707/2012 NIRAJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shri Singh with Mr.Dheeraj Kumar & Ms. Aakanksha Singh, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K.Sharma, St. Counsel with Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Ms. Somi Mehra & Ms. Renu Malik, Advocates +3. CRL.REV.P. 34/2013 THOMAS MATHEW ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. M.P. Raju with Mr. J.P. Thomas, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THR. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K.Sharma, St. Counsel with Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Ms. Somi Mehra & Ms...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and anr Vs. Satya Pal
Court: Delhi
$~18 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5380/2013 Date of decision:26. h May, 2014 % UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through : ..... Petitioners Mr.V.S.R.Krishna and Mr.Abhishek Yadav, Advocates. versus SATYA PAL Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sharad K.Agrawal, Ms.Sangeeta Agrawal and Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 22nd November, 2012 allowing the O.A.No.3062/2011. The facts giving rise to the instant petition are within a narrow compass. The respondent retired from the post of Assistant Controller of Stores at the Wheel and Axle Plant, Yelahanka, Bangalore and his settled dues were based by the respondents on the pay he was drawing at the time of his superannuation.2. The respondents appointment as Assistant Controller, Stores (liaison) Group B was by way of a promotion from the post of Officer Superintendant to wh...
Tag this Judgment!Gnct of Delhi and ors Vs. Rohtas Singh
Court: Delhi
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3420/2014 Date of decision:26. h May, 2014 % GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. V.K. Tandon, Adv. versus ROHTAS SINGH Through : ..... Respondent Mr. T.D. Yadav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) CAV No.475/2014 Inasmuch as the respondents are represented before this court and has been heard, caveat notice shall stand discharged. W.P.(C) 3420/2014 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 21st February, 2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing O.A.No.3574/2012 directing the petitioner herein to treat the period between which the respondent herein was dismissed from service till the date he was reinstated, as period spent on duty.2. It appears that the present respondent along with his younger brother Harsarup Singh and Dharambir Singh and other three WP(C) No.3420/2014 page 1 of 5 persons were charged and subjected to a trial in ...
Tag this Judgment!