Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 9 of about 432 results (0.025 seconds)Dcm Shriram Industries Ltd. Vs. Hb Stockholdings Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 04.2014 CO.A(SB) 7/2014 & CA No.275/2014 DCM SHRIRAM INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Appellant versus HB STOCKHOLDINGS LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Ramesh Singh and Mr A.T. Patra. For the Respondents : Mr H.S. Chandhoke and Mr Anant Garg. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant company under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 challenging the order dated 10.12.2013 passed by the Company Law Board in CP No.192/2007 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order). By the impugned order, the Company Law Board has dismissed an application being CA No.12/C.No.1/2013, filed by the appellant company, inter alia, seeking dismissal of the petition filed by the respondent no.1 under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 being CP No.192/2007. The Companies Act, 1956 is hereinafter referred to a...
Tag this Judgment!Kartar Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2014 Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 586/2013 KISHORE KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Adv. for appellant Kishor Kumar, Mr J.S. Kushwaha, Adv for Appellant Anita Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 644/2013 BIMLA ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate Through: versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 651/2013 MUKESH Through: versus .... Appellant Counsel for the appellant. STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Through: ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate CRL.A. 835/2013 KARTAR versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State + CRL.A. 485/2014 MANGAL Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR....
Tag this Judgment!Mool Chand Khairati Ram Trust Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5th February, 2014 Date of Decision:28. h April, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1478/2012 & CM APPLS. 3251 AND7183OF2012MOOL CHAND KHAIRATI RAM TRUST ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms Misha, Mr Karan Sachdev, Ms Ritu Bhalla and Mr Kartik, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Jatan Singh, CGSC and Mr Soayib Qureshi, Mr Naginder Benial and Mr Mudit Gupta, Advs. for UOI + W.P.(C) 3737/2012 & CM APPL.7842/2012 ST. STEPHENS' HOSPITAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr Rajeev Sharma, Mr Uddyam Mukherjee and Mr Sahil Bhalaik, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Sunil Kumar and Mr Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Adv. for UOI W.P.(C) 3792/2013 & CM APPL.7082/2013 SITARAM BHARTIA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & RESEARCH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Lalit Bhasin and Ms Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Bansal with Ms Khusboo Garg, Mr Ankit Sharma a...
Tag this Judgment!Sunny Vs. State (Gnct of Dlehi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2014 Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 839/2013 GOVIND @ BHARAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr N.K. Chahar, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CRL.A. 956/2013 SANDEEP @ SANJEEV ..... Appellant Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Through: + CRL.A. 960/2013 SUNNY ..... Appellant Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary and Mr. Vineet Jain, Advs. Through: versus STATE (GNCT OF DLEHI) ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.On 02.10.2009, Head Constable Rajesh Kumar (PW2) was on patrol with other police officials in the area of S.P. Badli at BG Block. When they reached at BG Block, near MCD toilet at about 7.45 pm, they saw a person coming running and shouting pakro pakro. Four boys were running ahead of the aforesaid person. The aforesaid four persons were apprehen...
Tag this Judgment!Kishore Kumar and anr. Vs. State Govt. of Nct
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2014 Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 586/2013 KISHORE KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Adv. for appellant Kishor Kumar, Mr J.S. Kushwaha, Adv for Appellant Anita Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 644/2013 BIMLA ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate Through: versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 651/2013 MUKESH Through: versus .... Appellant Counsel for the appellant. STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Through: ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate CRL.A. 835/2013 KARTAR versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State + CRL.A. 485/2014 MANGAL Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR....
Tag this Judgment!State Nct of Delhi Vs. Satender and anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h April, 2014 + CRL.L.P. 261/2014 & Crl.M.A. 5811/2014 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. versus SATENDER & ANR Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): There is delay of 18 days in filing of the application for leave to appeal and hence application for condonation of delay has been filed. However, before issuing notice on the said application, we have deemed it appropriate to examine the leave to appeal application on merits.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there were two eye witnesses, namely, Usha Rani (PW-2) and Subhash Chand (PW-3), who have deposed and testified about presence of the respondents Satender and Manoj Kumar at the spot and their involvement. She submits that Subhash Chand (PW-3) was the injured eye witness and it does not make any difference that his statement was reco...
Tag this Judgment!S.P. Choudhary Vs. Security Exchange Board of India Through: Its Chai
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 CRL.A. 1029/2009 S.S. THAKUR ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. + SECURITY EXCHANGEW BOARD OF INDIA THEROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1030/2009 ROOP LAL KUNDAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1031/2009 S.P. CHOUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 24/2010 DALIP SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bajaj, Adv. versus SEBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25.11.2009 and the Order on Sentence dated 30.11.2009 whereby t...
Tag this Judgment!Devi Prasad Vs. Taj Sats Air Catering Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on April 28, 2014 + W.P.(C) 17460/2006 DEVI PRASAD Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K.Gupta, Advocate versus TAJ SATS AIR CATERING LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated October 11, 2006, whereby the Industrial Tribunal No.II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Tribunal, in short) decided I.D. No.137/2004, holding that the retirement of the petitioner at the age of 55 years is justified.2. Before I come to the facts, suffice to state that the impugned award decides the reference made by the appropriate Government in the following terms:Whether the proposed retirement of Sh.Devi Prasad S/o Late Sh. Narain Dutt on attaining the age of 55 years is illegal and/or unjustified and if so, what sum of money as monetary relief along with consequential benefits in terms of the existing laws/Government Notifications and...
Tag this Judgment!Roop Lal Kundal Vs. Security Exchange Board of India Through: Its Chai
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 CRL.A. 1029/2009 S.S. THAKUR ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. + SECURITY EXCHANGEW BOARD OF INDIA THEROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1030/2009 ROOP LAL KUNDAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1031/2009 S.P. CHOUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 24/2010 DALIP SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bajaj, Adv. versus SEBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25.11.2009 and the Order on Sentence dated 30.11.2009 whereby t...
Tag this Judgment!S.S. Thakur Vs. Security Exchange Board of India therough Its Chai
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 CRL.A. 1029/2009 S.S. THAKUR ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. + SECURITY EXCHANGEW BOARD OF INDIA THEROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1030/2009 ROOP LAL KUNDAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1031/2009 S.P. CHOUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 24/2010 DALIP SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bajaj, Adv. versus SEBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25.11.2009 and the Order on Sentence dated 30.11.2009 whereby t...
Tag this Judgment!