Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 6 of about 432 results (0.048 seconds)Raffles International Ltd. Vs. Mr. Ramana
Court: Delhi
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 882/2011 Judgment dated 30th April, 2014 % RAFFLES INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.Manav, Adv. versus MR. RAMANA ..... Defendants Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off, for damages and accounts of profit.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 were issued on 08.04.2011. Counsel for defendants No.1 to 3 entered appearance on 12.05.2011 and the court was informed that defendant No.2 had expired a few months back. Counsel for the defendants also sought time to file written statement. On 04.08.2011, on request of counsel for the defendants, by way of last opportunity, further time was granted to the defendants to file written statement. However, from the next date of hearing, i.e. 30.08.2011 neither counsel for the defendants appeared nor any writ...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors Vs. Jatashankar
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2053/2014 & Cav.No.291/2014 & CM Nos.43014302/2014 Date of Decision:30. h April, 2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.+Jitendra Kumar Singh, Adv. versus JATASHANKAR Through ..... Respondent Mr.A.K. Bhakta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) Cav.No.291/2014 1. The caveator is represented. Therefore, caveat notice is discharged. WP (C) No.2053/2014 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners assailing the order dated 9th December, 2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing OA No.4279 of 2011. The facts giving rise to the instant writ petition are within a narrow compass. The respondent before us was appointed as casual labourer on the 23rd November, 1988 with the petitioners; was granted a temporary status in 1989 and his services were subsequently regularised. WP (C) No.2053/2014 The admitted facts before us are t...
Tag this Judgment!Somvir and ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :11. h MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :29. h APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A. 1004/2011 & CRL.M.B.No.105/2014 SOMVIR & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Rakesh Nautiyal, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Somvir (A-1), Rajesh Kumar (A-2) and Kapil (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 19.02.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.1070/09 arising out of FIR No.128/05 PS Kanjhawla by which they were convicted under Sections 392/394/397 IPC. By an order dated 28.02.2011, A-1 was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine ` 2,000/- under Sections 392/394 IPC; A-2 was awarded RI for three years with fine ` 2,000/- under Section 392 IPC and A-3 was awarded RI for five years with fine ` 2,000/- under Sections 392/394 IPC and RI for seven years under Section 397 IPC. The substantive sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated, ...
Tag this Judgment!Kirpal Singh Vs. Navdeep Kaur and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:29. 04.2014 RC. REV. 400/2013 & CM APPL. 17196/2013 KIRPAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. with petitioner in person. Versus NAVDEEP KAUR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This petition impugns an order dated 26.07.2013 directing eviction of the petitioner/tenant from 2nd floor flat in property bearing No.361, Sant Nagar, New Delhi after his leave to defend was denied.2. The grounds taken by the petitioner in his leave to defend were that (i) the suit for eviction is not accompanied by a site plan of the entire property; (ii) it does not give dimensions of the suit premises; (iii) the respondents-landlords have several residential properties and industrial plots in their names and in the names of their family members, which are in their possession, hence , they do not require premises in question for their bona fide...
Tag this Judgment!Sombir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1463/2014 SOMBIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Subhash Chand Tomar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, CGSC with Ms.Payal Raghav, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioner in the present writ petition is admittedly an employee of a Unit Run Canteen who seeks issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing/setting aside of the impugned order 7846/TOS/NOIDA/CSD dated 26th April, 2012, which is a dismissal order passed by the Respondents allegedly without giving any opportunity to the Petitioner to defend himself.2. At the outset a preliminary objection is raised to the maintainability of the petition by learned counsel for the Respondents who contends that in terms of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in Civil...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Goel and Others Vs. the State and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 04.2014 WPC No.3049/2013 SUNIL GOEL & OTHERS ... Petitioners Respondents ... Petitioner Respondents ... Petitioners Respondents versus THE STATE AND ORS WITH + WPC No.2779/2013 KRISHNA KAUSHIK versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS AND + WPC No.8138/2013 HARPREET SINGH & ANOTHER versus THE STATE & ORS AND + WPC No.3055/2013 CHAKIT JINDAL ... Petitioner Respondents ... Petitioner Respondents ... Petitioners Respondents ... Petitioner Respondents versus THE STATE & ORS AND + WPC No.3056/2013 SHRI NIWAS AND SONS versus THE STATE & ORS AND + WPC No.3249/2013 RAJ KUMAR & OTHERS versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS AND + WPC No.3284/2013 RAM DHARI JINDAL MEMORIAL TRUST (REGD) versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS AND + WPC No.3490/2013 CHANDRAKANTA C. MESHRAM ... Petitioner Respondents ... Petitioner Respondents ... Petitioners Respondents ... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS AND + WPC No.3549/2013 GIRISH CHHABRA versus...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Golakiya Aayush Parshottambhal Vs. the Director, National Board of ...
Court: Delhi
32 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2663/2014 DR. GOLAKIYA AAYUSH PARSHOTTAMBHAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate. versus THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate. % Date of Decision :29. h April, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the communication dated 11th March, 2014 as well as for a direction directing the respondent to round off the marks of the petitioner in DNB General Medicine from 191.50 to 192 and for further direction to consider the case of the petitioner for grace marks in accordance with Clause 4.3(iv) of the Brochure/Prospectus issued by the respondent.2. Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondent failed to appreciate that there is no bar or prohibition in the Brochure of the respondent for rounding off the marks obtained by the petitioner.3. Mr. Kalra fur...
Tag this Judgment!Naushad Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 1019/2010 SALEEM @ PINNI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Parvez A. Siddiqui, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1020/2010 NAUSHAD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd., Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1022/2010 HARSH KUMAR @ HONEY ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Riaz Mohd., Adv. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 28.08.2001, Sub Inspector Viresh Kumar of Police Station Lahori Gate, on receipt of information with respect to an armed dacoity reached Gandhi Gali where Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta met him and told him that three boys had snatched an attachi (briefcase) containing Rs.17.35 lac from his employee Mr. Vasudev, who was present in Nai Basti. Thereu...
Tag this Judgment!Abdul Aziz Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : March 21, 2014 DECIDED ON : April 29, 2014 + CRL.A.323/2012 ABDUL AZIZ Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.P.S.Jaiswal, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Abdul Aziz challenges the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 04.02.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge-02 (North) in Sessions Case No.52/2011 arising out of FIR No.263/2006 under Section 395/412/120B IPC registered at police station Kotwali by which he was convicted under Section 412 IPC. By an order dated 09.02.2012, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine `10,000/-.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case, as set up in the charge- sheet, was that on 04.06.2006 at about 3.15 p.m. a decoity took place at the office of the complainant-Sukhbir Sharan Aggarwal at 1994, Katra Lachu Singh, Chandni Chowk, Delhi. The assailants decamped with cash `22/23 l...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Asha Lata Pandey Vs. Braham Pal Singh Yadav
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:29. 04.2014 RC. REV. 62/2014 & CM APPLs. 2137-38/2014 SMT. ASHA LATA PANDEY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Versus BRAHAM PAL SINGH YADAV Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 The present petition impugns an order of 31st May, 2013 whereby the petitioners eviction petition before the Rent Controller was dismissed. Facts:2. The petitioner along with her late husband had filed a petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short the Act) seeking eviction of the respondent from the suit premises bearing No.R-157, Gali No.8, Ramesh Park, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92. The grounds for revision petition are that there has been a miscarriage of justice; that suit property was required bona fide for her family and there is no other suitable accommodation available; the eviction petition does not abate on the death of one of the petition...
Tag this Judgment!