Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 5 of about 432 results (0.027 seconds)N C. Bakshi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:27. 03.2014 Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2014 % + W.P.(C) 5631/2010 N. C. BAKSHI ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1216/2011 DR. S.C. MAHAJAN & ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 3631/2011 DR. RAJESH KUMAR SAXENA AND ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ANR + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 3863/2011 DR. PURNIMA GUPTA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ANR WP(C) 5631/2010 & connected matters ..... RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 5495/2011 DR. SUDESH KUMARI SHAH ..... PETITIONER VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 6009/2011 & CM No.12140/2011 DR. MANGAL NATH ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5106/2011 & CM No.10351/2011 SUMAN BALA JAIN & ORS. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5975/2010 & CM No....
Tag this Judgment!Dr. S.C. Mahajan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:27. 03.2014 Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2014 % + W.P.(C) 5631/2010 N. C. BAKSHI ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1216/2011 DR. S.C. MAHAJAN & ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 3631/2011 DR. RAJESH KUMAR SAXENA AND ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ANR + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 3863/2011 DR. PURNIMA GUPTA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ANR WP(C) 5631/2010 & connected matters ..... RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 5495/2011 DR. SUDESH KUMARI SHAH ..... PETITIONER VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 6009/2011 & CM No.12140/2011 DR. MANGAL NATH ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5106/2011 & CM No.10351/2011 SUMAN BALA JAIN & ORS. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5975/2010 & CM No....
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Bihar Carrying Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. United India Insurance Co. ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.489/2012 30th April, 2014 % M/S. BIHAR CARRYING CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.S. Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S. K. Ray, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the judgment of the court below dated 11.9.2012 by which the application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the exparte judgment and decree dated 10.12.2007 has been dismissed. By the exparte judgment dated 10.12.2007 against the appellant/defendant a money decree of Rs.4,30,555/alongwith interest @ 12% per annum simple was passed on account of loss of the consignment by the appellant/defendant of Indian made foreign liquor sent by the plaintiff no.2/respondent no.2 thro...
Tag this Judgment!Shashi Kiran and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:17. 04.2014 Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2014 % + W.P.(C) 2036/2010 KANTA BATRA & ORS. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 2037/2010 KAMLESH MALHOTRA & ORS. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 3095/2010 and CM No.7718/2011 MANJEET SIKKA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UOI AND ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5759/2010 SHASHI KIRAN & ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS WP(C) 2036/2010 & connected matters ..... RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 24 + W.P.(C) 7310/2010 DR. RAJINDER KAUR & ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8560/2010 GEETA WADHWA AND ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UOI AND ORS ..... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioners : Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms. Punam Singh and Ms.Amrita Prakash, Advocates in WP(C) Nos.2036/2010 and 8560/2010; Ms. Nandini Sahni, Advocate in WP(C) 2037/2010; Mr. ...
Tag this Judgment!Mangala Prasad Upadhyay Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:27. 03.2014 Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2014 % + W.P.(C) 5631/2010 N. C. BAKSHI ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1216/2011 DR. S.C. MAHAJAN & ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 3631/2011 DR. RAJESH KUMAR SAXENA AND ORS ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ANR + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 3863/2011 DR. PURNIMA GUPTA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ANR WP(C) 5631/2010 & connected matters ..... RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 10 + W.P.(C) 5495/2011 DR. SUDESH KUMARI SHAH ..... PETITIONER VERSUS SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE AND ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 6009/2011 & CM No.12140/2011 DR. MANGAL NATH ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5106/2011 & CM No.10351/2011 SUMAN BALA JAIN & ORS. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + ..... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 5975/2010 & CM No....
Tag this Judgment!State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) Vs. Naushad and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. h April, 2014 Pronounced on:30. h April, 2014 + CRL. L.P.162/ 2014 & Crl. M.A. 3174/ 2014 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for the State. Versus NAUSHAD & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. By this petition under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the State seeks leave to file an appeal against the judgment and the order on sentence dated 24.05.2013 and 28.05.2013 respectively whereby respondents No.1 to 3 were convicted for the offences punishable under Section 304 (Part I) read with Section 34 and Section 308 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). For the offence punishable under Section 304 (Part I) IPC, respondents Naushad @ Sonu and Dilshad Khan were sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 8 years each ...
Tag this Judgment!Jayshree Dansena, Chhattisgarh Vs. M/S Athena Chhattisgarh Power Priva ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Dalip Singh, Judicial Member: 1. This application has been filed under section 18 read with Section 14 and Section 15 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with the following prayer. This application is moved for the purpose of protecting lives and health of the people of the villages Singhitarai, Katharrapali, Singhitarai, Nimuhi, Odekera, District “Janjgir “ Champa and to make villages free from pollution and unless suitable orders have passed by this Honble Tribunal it would endanger the lives of the people of the villages. A. Applicant prays your Lordship for an order or direction upon the respondent no. 1 to stop the dynamite blasting at project site Gram Singhitarai. B. Applicant prays your Lordship for an order or direction to construct the damage wall of School and houses in Gram- Singhitarai. C. Applicant prays your Lordship for an order or direction to provide sanitation arrangements for the drivers and other contract workers. D. Applicant prays your Lordship f...
Tag this Judgment!Gulab Meena, Rajasthan and Another Vs. State of Rajasthan Through the ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
(NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL) Dalip Singh, Judicial Member: 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. Original Application No. 130/2013 came to be transferred after D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 13683/2012 was transferred by the Honble High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur to this Tribunal vide its order dtd. 23.09.2013. 2. In the petition it has been stated that Khasra No. 235 measuring 346 Bigha situated in Village Kishorepura, Tehsil Sapotra, District Karauli in Rajasthan is a forest land for which in Annexure-I the Land Revenue Record (Jamabandi) has been filed in support thereof which shows that Khasra No. 235 measuring 346 Bigha stands in the name of the Forest Department. 3. It is alleged that the aforesaid Khasra No. 235 has been encroached upon by certain persons by name Shri Ramesh, Mukesh, Mahesh and Dinesh to the extent of 150 Bigha. The villagers objected to the same and even filed a complaint before the Dy. Collect...
Tag this Judgment!Triumphant Institute of Management Education Vs. Time Coaching/Educati ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment dated 30.04.2014 + CS(OS) 664/2013 TRIUMPHANT INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION .......... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Pravin Anand and Ms.Saukshmya, Advs. versus TIME COACHING/EDUCATION & ORS. Through : None ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining violation and infringement of rights in the trademark T.I.M.E., passing off, unfair competition, dilusion, rendition of accounts, delivery-up etc. against the defendants.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 were issued on 10.04.2013. On an application for appointment of Local Commissioners, filed by the plaintiff, five Local Commissioners were also appointed in the matter. Counsel for defendants No.3 and 4 entered appearance on 11.07.2013. Despite service, none appeared for defendant nos. 1 and 2 who were proceeded ex parte on 11.0...
Tag this Judgment!Yogesh Kumar @ Bunty Vs. State(Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h March, 2014 Pronounced on:30. h April, 2014 + CRL.A.580/2010 YOGESH KUMAR @ BUNTY Through ..... Appellant Mr. B.S. Rana, Advocate versus STATE(GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Having been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of one Jitender @ Vicky in Sessions Case No.98/2009 (arising out of FIR No.161/2007, P.S. Rajinder Nagar) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, or in default of payment of which he was to further undergo RI for two months, the appellant has preferred this appeal challenging the judgment and order on sentence dated 09.04.2010.2. Homicidal death of the deceased has not been disputed by the appellant. In fact, the dead body of the deceased was recovered from the toilet ...
Tag this Judgment!