Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 10 of about 432 results (0.050 seconds)Bimla Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2014 Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 586/2013 KISHORE KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Adv. for appellant Kishor Kumar, Mr J.S. Kushwaha, Adv for Appellant Anita Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 644/2013 BIMLA ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate Through: versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 651/2013 MUKESH Through: versus .... Appellant Counsel for the appellant. STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Through: ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate CRL.A. 835/2013 KARTAR versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State + CRL.A. 485/2014 MANGAL Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR....
Tag this Judgment!R.P. Khosla and anr. Vs. Connaught Plaza Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t March, 2014 Date of decision:28. h April, 2014 % + CO. APPL (SB) No.11/2014 WITH CO. APPL. Nos.475476/2013 & CO. APPL. No.482/2014 R.P. KHOSLA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Deepak Khosla in person. versus CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANT PVT. LTD. AND ORS. Through: None. ......Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR R. V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an appeal filed by Mr. Deepak Khosla under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 impugning the orders passed by the Company Law Board (CLB) on 18.12.2013 and 31.12.2013.2. The question of law sought to be urged in this appeal is whether the CLB was right in law in holding that the appellant (petitioner before the CLB) had no locus standi under Section 237(b) of the said Act.3. The appellant had filed Company Petition No.130(ND)/2013 before the CLB invoking the suo motu jurisdiction of the CLB under Section 237(b) of the Act to investigate into the affairs of M/s. Connaught Pla...
Tag this Judgment!Mangal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2014 Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 586/2013 KISHORE KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Adv. for appellant Kishor Kumar, Mr J.S. Kushwaha, Adv for Appellant Anita Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 644/2013 BIMLA ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate Through: versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 651/2013 MUKESH Through: versus .... Appellant Counsel for the appellant. STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Through: ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate CRL.A. 835/2013 KARTAR versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State + CRL.A. 485/2014 MANGAL Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR....
Tag this Judgment!National Investor Forum Regd. Vs. Golden Forests India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:25. 03.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:28. 04.2014 + W.P. (C) 1399/2010 CM APPL.477-478/2013, 10845/2010 and 5306-5307/2012 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD. Through: None. ..... Petitioner versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay G. Majithia with Mr. Harpal Saini, Advocates in CM108452010, 53065307/2012 and 477-478/2013. Mr. Harpawan Kumar Arora, Advocate for Committee-GFIL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT1 In CM No.477/2013, Amartex Industries Ltd (hereafter called Amartex) seeks recall of an order of this Court dated 27.04.2012 (which declined to consider CM No.5306/2012, until an amount of 25% of the bid amount was deposited). In CM No.478/2013 it seeks an order for discharge of an undertaking given by it to the Court at an earlier stage of the proceeding, for purchase of extent of 77 killas of land in Village Jharmari and another extent of land...
Tag this Judgment!Dalip Singh Vs. Sebi
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 CRL.A. 1029/2009 S.S. THAKUR ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. + SECURITY EXCHANGEW BOARD OF INDIA THEROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1030/2009 ROOP LAL KUNDAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 1031/2009 S.P. CHOUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus + SECURITY EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CRL.A. 24/2010 DALIP SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bajaj, Adv. versus SEBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Adv. for SEBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25.11.2009 and the Order on Sentence dated 30.11.2009 whereby t...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2014 Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 586/2013 KISHORE KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Adv. for appellant Kishor Kumar, Mr J.S. Kushwaha, Adv for Appellant Anita Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 644/2013 BIMLA ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate Through: versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 651/2013 MUKESH Through: versus .... Appellant Counsel for the appellant. STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Through: ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate CRL.A. 835/2013 KARTAR versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State + CRL.A. 485/2014 MANGAL Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr Azhar Qayum, Advocate STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR....
Tag this Judgment!Akil Ahmad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :03.04.2014. Judgment delivered on :28.04.2014. CRL.A. 494/2000 AKIL AHMAD Through: Appellant Mr. H.M. Singh and Ms. Shabana, Advs. Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 31.07.2000 & 04.08.2000 respectively wherein he has been convicted under Sections 363/366/376 of the IPC. For the offence under Section 376 of the IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for 1 year; for the offence under Section 366 of the IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for 9 months; for the offence under Section 363 of the IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of...
Tag this Judgment!Govind @ Bharat Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2014 Date of Decision:28. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 839/2013 GOVIND @ BHARAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr N.K. Chahar, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CRL.A. 956/2013 SANDEEP @ SANJEEV ..... Appellant Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Through: + CRL.A. 960/2013 SUNNY ..... Appellant Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary and Mr. Vineet Jain, Advs. Through: versus STATE (GNCT OF DLEHI) ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.On 02.10.2009, Head Constable Rajesh Kumar (PW2) was on patrol with other police officials in the area of S.P. Badli at BG Block. When they reached at BG Block, near MCD toilet at about 7.45 pm, they saw a person coming running and shouting pakro pakro. Four boys were running ahead of the aforesaid person. The aforesaid four persons were apprehen...
Tag this Judgment!Tony @ Topesh Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :28. h APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A. 1083/2011 TONY @ TOPESH Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Srilina Roy, Advocate for Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant Tony @ Topesh impugns a judgment dated 12.04.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.367/07 arising out of FIR No.257/07 PS Adarsh Nagar by which he was convicted under Section 394/34 IPC read with Section 397 IPC. By an order dated 13.04.2010, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. Allegations reflected in the charge-sheet against the appellant were that on 11.05.2007 at about 10.20 P.M. at Azadpur Flyover, near TPT Center Azadpur, Delhi, he and his associates robbed complainant Sanjay Arora, of a purse containing ` 2,000/- and a mobile phone make Nokia. The assailants were armed with kniv...
Tag this Judgment!Roop Singh Vs. Roshan Lal and ors.
Court: Delhi
8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.93/2012 and CM102152012 (Stay) 28th April, 2014 % ROOP SINGH Through: ......Appellant Mr. Arvind Nayar, Mr. Bharat Bhushan Gupta, Mr. Sanad Kumar Jha, Advocates. VERSUS ROSHAN LAL & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This second appeal is filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 18.7.2011 and the first appellate court dated 3.5.2012; by which the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff claiming the reliefs of declaration, injunction etc. was dismissed. Originally in the suit four reliefs were claimed, but the fourth relief claimed of partition was withdrawn as per order the dated 5.9.2006 as recorded by the trial court. The other three reliefs which will therefore remain are as under :i) A decree for declaration be passed in favou...
Tag this Judgment!