Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Niranjan Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24.03.2014. Judgment delivered on:27.03.2014 CRL.A. 189/2006 NIRANJAN SINGH Through ..... Appellant Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishal Gosain, Mr. Kuldeep Gaur and Mr. Harsh Bora, Advs. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr. Varun Goswami, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal has been directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 04.03.2006 & 06.03.2006 respectively wherein the appellant Niranjan Singh has been convicted under Sections 7 and 13 (1)(d) read with Section 13 (1)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for three months for the offence under Section 13 (1)(d) of the said Act; for the offence under Section 7 of the said Act, he has been sentenced to u...
Geetika Verma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Test Cas No.93 of 2012 Decided on :27. h March, 2014 GEETIKA VERMA Through: Petitioner Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate with petitioner in person. Versus Respondent STATE Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a petition under Section 278 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 for grant of probate of the Will dated 14.10.1996 and Letters of Administration.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner, Geetika Verma, is the niece of the deceased testatrix, Urmilla Devi Abbi, and also the executor of the Will dated 14.10.1996. The deceased testatrix was unmarried and professed Hindu religion. She was the sole and absolute owner of the suit property bearing Flat No.12-A, Ground Floor, Category-LIG, DDA Flats, Tamoor Nagar, New Delhi-65, which was the self-acquired property. The deceased is stated to have been residing in the suit premises from the date of purchase till her demise. The learned counsel for th...
iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Ram Bahadur and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. h March, 2014 + MAC.APP. No.246/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. Versus RAM BAHADUR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. S.K. Vashishth, Adv. for R1 to R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 12.12.2012, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.2,48,100/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. Ms. Suman Bagga, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that Ld. Tribunal has held that the claimants cannot be considered as dependents of the deceased and consequently they are only entitled to loss of estate. Despite the fact recorded by the Ld. Tribunal, an amount of Rs.2,18,050.56/- was granted towards loss of estate.3. Ms. Bagga has fa...
Kajal Vs. Marwah
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 870/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. MARWAH ..... Respondent + Through: Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. Through: Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. Through: Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. CRL.A. 1520/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 1521/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 1522/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. CRL.A. 1524/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. CRL.L.P. 348/2013 ..... Petitioner KAJAL Through: Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. versus VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. + CRL.A. 1523/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. VI...
Kajal Vs. Vikas Marwah
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 870/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. MARWAH ..... Respondent + Through: Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. Through: Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. Through: Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. CRL.A. 1520/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 1521/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 1522/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. CRL.A. 1524/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Vineet Sharma, Adv. CRL.L.P. 348/2013 ..... Petitioner KAJAL Through: Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. versus VIKAS MARWAH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. + CRL.A. 1523/2013 KAJAL ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. VI...
Harbans Lal Munjal Vs. Ramesh Kumar Khattar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: March 27, 2014 + RC. Rev. No.494/2012 HARBANS LAL MUNJAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Mr.Atul Kumar, Ms.Samreen, Ms.Rupali Kapoor & Ms.Nikhar Mulwani, Advs. versus RAMESH KUMAR KHATTAR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Garg, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has assailed the judgment dated 23rd July, 2012 passed by Additional Rent Controller, Rohini, Delhi whereby the eviction petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. Brief facts for adjudication of the present case are that the petitioner filed an eviction petition against the respondent on the ground of bonafide requirement in respect of one shop in B-33, Tagore Road, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi-110033 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted shop) which was ...
Asha Aggarwal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. M.C.2757/2009 Judgment reserved on :17. h February, 2014 Judgment pronounced on :27. h March, 2014 % ASHA AGGARWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Hrishikesh Baruah and Ms.Ankita Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.O.P.Saxena, APP for the State with ACP J.K.Sharma, PG Cell, Central District and Insp.Brij Mohan, PS Kirti Nagar. Mr.Balraj, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ORDER:1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner by invoking the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with request to quash the FIR no.204/2009, PS Kirti Nagar registered for the offence under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as SC & ST Act). The main contention of the petitioner is that the complaint/FIR does not disclose the main ingredients of Section 3 (1) (x) of SC & ST Act even if it is taken on the f...
K.K. Reddy Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment :27.03.2014. CRL.REV.P. 78/2014 K.K. REDDY Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Mr.Uddyam Mukherjee, Mr.Anuj Handa and Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP along with SI Lokender Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.1973/2014 (Exemption) 1 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2 Application disposed off. CRL.REV.P. 78/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.1972/2014 (stay) 3 The petitioner has impugned the order dated 22.10.2003 passed by the Sessions Judge upholding the order of the Magistrate dated 27.05.2008 wherein charge had been framed against the petitioner under Section 304-A of the IPC; his submission is that neither the ingredients of rash and nor any negligence qua the petitioner are made out; in the absence of which charge under Section 304-A of the IPC could not have been framed against him. 4 ...
Deepak Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal 553/1998 Reserved on:13. h March, 2014 Date of Decision:27. h March, 2014 % DEEPAK SHARMA ....Appellant Through Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Amicus Curiae. Versus STATE Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SANJIV KHANNA, J.The appellant Deepak Sharma is absconding and proceedings under Section 82/83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C., for short) have been initiated against him. The appellant was released on interim bail for 45 days vide order dated 28th July, 1999 which was extended till 29th September, 1999 by order dated 14th September, 1999. On 29th September, 1999 request for further extension of bail was rejected. Order sheet dated 16th November, 2006 reveals that the appellant did not surrender on or after 29th September, 1999 and had remained absconding.2. In the meanwhile, the appeal has come up for hearing in normal course and we have he...
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Sarita and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 630/2013 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. L.K.Tyagi, Adv. Versus SARITA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.N.P.Nehra, Adv. for R1 to R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 28.02.2013, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.27,12,995/- with penal interest @ 12% per annum on account of delayed payment from the date of filing of the DAR till the date of deposit of the amount.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 09.07.2012 at about 8.20PM, victim Prasenjit Biswas @ Sanjeev was coming from Gurgaon to his residence on his motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-9SF-7493. When he reached near Toll Tax, Rajokri Flyover on NH-8, a van bearing registration No.UP16-J-6977 was being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent ma...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »