Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.P.Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 12,2014 Judgment Delivered on : March 03, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6735/2002 S.P.SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.U.Srivastava, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Vanessa Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Without praying that the order dated July 25, 2001 passed by the disciplinary authority dismissing petitioner from service and without praying that the order dated October 23, 2001 rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated July 25, 2001 and additionally without praying that the order dated February 28, 2002 rejecting the revision petition filed by the petitioner be set aside, mandamus is prayed for that the petitioner should be reinstated in service with full back wages.2. Notwithstanding the aberration in the prayer made we treat the three orders to be challenged...
J.P. Bhardwaj Vs. Sawan Public School and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8184/2013 & CM APPL. 17276/2013 J.P. BHARDWAJ ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Advocate. versus SAWAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Chhabra, Advocate with Ms. Richa Narang, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Amiet Andlay, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. Reserved on :24. h February, 2014 Date of Decision :03. d March, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Petitioner, who was a teacher employed by respondent No.1-school wants to retain official accommodation at the school premises till the time his appeal is disposed of by the Delhi School Tribunal.2. Admittedly, the Delhi School Tribunal is not functional because of non-availability of a Chairman.3. The initial writ petition bearing W.P.(C) 7978/2013 filed by the petitioner challenging his removal from service was disposed of by this Court on 17th December, 2013 by the...
Hari Om Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 24, 2014 DECIDED ON : March 03, 2014 + CRL.A.119/2011 HARI OM Through : versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. S.P.GARG, J.1. Hari Om (the appellant) challenges the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 30.03.2010 in Sessions Case No.118/07 arising out of FIR No.153/06 registered at Police Station New Usmanpur by which he was convicted for committing offences under Section 452/308 IPC. By a sentence order dated 31.03.2010, he was awarded RI for two years under Section 308 IPC and RI for one year with fine `30,000/- under Section 452 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently. `25,000/- were to be paid to the victim as compensation out of the fine of `30,000/- on realization.2. Allegations against the appellant in the charge-sheet were that on 29.04.2006 at 1.30 a.m. at House No.G-183, Ma...
Mohd. Samim Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h FEBRUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :3. d MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A. 525/2012 MOHD. SAMIM ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Deepak Vohra, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 25.08.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.19/10 arising out of FIR No.365/08 PS Patel Nagar by which the appellant Mohd. Samim was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 394/397/34 IPC and 27 Arms Act. By an order dated 27.08.2011, he was awarded RI for seven years under Section 397 IPC; RI for seven years with fine ` 1,000/- under Section 394 IPC and RI for four years with fine ` 500/- under Section 27 Arms Act. All these sentences were to operate concurrently.2. The prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet was that on 03.09.2008 at about 07.15 A.M. at house No....
Vineet Vats Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:03. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 360 of 2010 VINEET VATS ..... Appellant Mr. Raman Sahney, Adv. Through: versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) In the night intervening 6/7.2.2000, deceased Vimmi was brought by the appellant, who is her husband, to Sodhi Nursing Home, she having consumed insecticide. home. Vimmi died in the aforesaid nursing Since, Vimmi died within seven (7) years of marriage, the concerned SDM was informed, who reached the spot and recorded the statement of Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, father of the deceased. In the aforesaid statement, Shri Ram Kumar Sharma inter alia stated that his daughter Vimmi @ Vimla was married to the appellant Vineeet Vats on 9.11.1995. He further stated that on being informed by his son-in-law at about 5:00 a.m., he reached Sodhi Nursing Home where his daughter was found dead. He alleged that ...
The Director All India Radio Vs. Ramesh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on February 28, 2014 Judgment Delivered on March 03, 2014 + W.P.(C) 15493/2006 THE DIRECTOR ALL INDIA RADIO ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Vikrant Yadav, Advocate versus RAMESH ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Parul Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the Award dated February 24, 2006 passed by the Industrial Tribunal in I.D No.2/2004, whereby the Industrial Tribunal has directed reinstatement of the respondent with full back wages. Initially a reference was made with respect to two persons namely Ramesh & Shyam Lal. Shyam Lal had abandoned his claim before the Industrial Tribunal itself and accordingly the award of the Industrial Tribunal is with regard to Ramesh only.2. It was the case of the respondent that he was engaged by the petitioner for doing perennial nature of work. The petitioner has indulged in unfair labour practices and...
Brahm Pal Singh Vs. P.O., Industrial Tribunal No.ii and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on February 26, 2014 Judgment Delivered on March 03, 2014 + W.P.(C) 4254/1999 BRAHM PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal, Advocate versus P.O., INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.II AND ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Amita Gupta & Mr.Ramakant Tripathi, Advocates for MCD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The petitioner in this writ petition has challenged the Award dated August 20, 1997 of the Industrial Tribunal in I.D No.1336/1990, whereby the Tribunal has not granted any relief to the petitioner. The industrial dispute was referred to the Industrial Tribunal with the following terms of reference:Whether the termination of services of Sh.Brahm Pal Singh is illegal and/or unjustified and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect. 2. It was the case of the petitioner workman before the Tribunal that he was employed by the respondent...
Kanti Prasad Tyagi Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 151 of 2008 KANTI PRASAD TYAGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.C. Tyagi with Mr. Kailash Pande, Mr. Balendra Tiwari, Mr. Inderajeet Mishra, Advocates. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER03032014 1. This appeal by Kanti Prasad Tyagi is directed against a judgment dated 13th February 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge, Delhi in Complaint Case No.49 of 2002 convicting him of the offences under Sections 7 and 13 (1)(d) read with Section 13 (1)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act). It is also against the order of sentence dated 13th February 2008 passed by the Special Judge sentencing the Appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of two years and a fine of Rs. 3,000 for the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for a period of two months and further ...
Deputy Director of Income Tax (E) Inv. Circle-ii Vs. Petroleum Sports ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
$~6 to 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d March, 2014 % + + + ITA2622013 ITA2642013 ITA2652013 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (E) INV. CIRCLE-II ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus PETROLEUM SPORTS PROMOTION BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta with Ms. Rani Kiyala and Ms. Khushbu Upadhaya, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. These three appeals filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) are directed against the consolidated order dated 27.07.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) for the assessment years 2003-04, 200405 and 2005-06.2. For the sake of convenience the facts relating to the assessment year 2003-04 are taken as illustrative. The assessee filed its return of income on 24.08.2003 declaring Rs.nil as its income. Apparen...
Hari Om Forwarding Vs. Radhey Shyam and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.62/2014 3rd March, 2014 % HARI OM FORWARDING Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Nishant Anand, Advocate. Versus RADHEY SHYAM & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.4035/2014 CM is allowed by condoning the delay. FAO No.62/2014 1. The challenge by means of this first appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is to the impugned order of the Commissioner, Employees Compensation dated 17.10.2012 which has awarded compensation to the respondent/employee.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent was employed as a loading/unloading worker by the appellant. On 5.11.2009 while loading fruits on truck bearing No.JH-01-AA/0359 the right hand of the respondent got trapped in the dala/flap of the truck resulting in three fingers of the right hand being chopped/broken off. Resp...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »