Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harpreet Singh and ors. Vs. Pushpa Wati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: March 3, 2014 + RC.REV. 475/2012 & C.M. No.16489/2012 HARPREET SINGH & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.H.S. Phoolka, Senior Advocate with Mr.T.C.Sharma, Adv. versus PUSHPA WATI Through ..... Respondent Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Arun Vohra & Mr.Dilip Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioners by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have assailed the eviction order dated 22nd May, 2012, passed by Additional Rent Controller, North, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent had filed an eviction petition against the petitioner in respect of one shop on the ground floor in the property bearing No.4731, Laxmi Bazar, Cloth Market, Fatehpuri, Delhi-11006 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted shop). It was stated in the eviction petition that the respondent,...
Akhilesh Kumar Vs. University Grants Commisison and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:21. 01.2014 Judgment delivered on:03. 03.2014 % + WP(C) 5865/2011 AKHILESH KUMAR ....Petitioner VERSUS UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION & ORS. .....Respondents ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Sinha and Ms. Nupur Grover, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Amitesh Kumar and Mr. M.F. Khan, Advocates for R-1 Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-3 CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) 5865/2011 and CM Nos.11913/2011 and 11914/2011 1. The petitioner, who is visually impaired, seeks quashing of the decision taken by respondent no.1 i.e., the University Grants Commission (hereinafter referred to as UGC) whereby, the exemption granted in his favour from taking the National Eligibility Test (in short NET), was withdrawn. A consequential direction is also sought for re-instatement to the post of Lecturer (English) on a permanent basis, wi...
Chhatravas, Chandra Arya Vidya Mandir Vs. the Director, Deptt of Women ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : February 04, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : March 03, 2014 WP(C) 9590/2009 CHHATRAVAS, CHANDRA ARYA VIDYA MANDIR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Nitinjya Chaudhary, Advocate versus THE DIRECTOR, DEPTT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEV. & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG instructed by Ms.S.Pushkarna, CGSC, Mr.Neeraj Chaudhary, CGSC, Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Mr.Ravjot Singh, Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Ms.Sana Sundaram and Ms.Aditi Mohan, Advocates for UOI with Ms.A.Kapoor, Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Women and Child Development Mr.G.Tushar Rao, Advocate for Intervener Arya Bal Griha Mr.Digvijay Rai, Advocate for Intervenor Arya Kanya Sadan, Mr.Amit Mahajan, Advocate for Chandravati Chaudhary Smarak Trust Mr.Anant Kumar Asthana, Advocate for applicant/HAQ Centre for Child Rights Intervener in CM No.5131/2012 Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan, Advocate with Ms.Latika Dutta, Advoca...
Prem Kumar Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:10. 02.2014 Judgment delivered on:03. 03.2014 % + WP(C) 1142/2001 PREM KUMAR ....PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner : Ms. Ashly Cherian, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Upender Thakur, Mr. Sumeet Bhatia and Mr. Tejveer Singh Bhatia, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 The petitioner seeks two substantive prayers. (i) First, that communication dated 02.02.2001, issued by respondent no.2 i.e., Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as I.I.T) calling upon the petitioner to appear for test and interview for the post of UDC (SG), in the pay scale of Rs.1400-2600, be quashed. This prayer is sought on the ground that the petitioner was already holding a pari materia post of Assistant (Accounts), which was, carrying a higher pay scale of Rs.16402900. (ii) Second, that a direction to be issued to ...
Rajnu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 02.2014 Date of Decision:03. 03.2014 % + CRL.A. 373 of 2010 KASHI RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 727 of 2010 ABDUL KADIR @ ADIL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. CRL.A. 778 of 2010 DHARMENDER @ AJAY Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. Versus STATE Through: Crl. A. Nos.373, 727, 778, 825 of 2010 ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 825 of 2010 RAJNU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 3.4.2008, the police control room was informed that 4-5 armed persons had entered the house of the informant in AE Block of Shalimar Bagh. The information, when transmitted to Police Station Shalimar Bagh, was recorded vide DD No.6A, copy of which w...
Dharmender @ Ajay Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 02.2014 Date of Decision:03. 03.2014 % + CRL.A. 373 of 2010 KASHI RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 727 of 2010 ABDUL KADIR @ ADIL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. CRL.A. 778 of 2010 DHARMENDER @ AJAY Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. Versus STATE Through: Crl. A. Nos.373, 727, 778, 825 of 2010 ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 825 of 2010 RAJNU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 3.4.2008, the police control room was informed that 4-5 armed persons had entered the house of the informant in AE Block of Shalimar Bagh. The information, when transmitted to Police Station Shalimar Bagh, was recorded vide DD No.6A, copy of which w...
Kallu Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:25. 02.2014 Date of Decision:03. 03.2014 CRL.A. 592/2013 SINGHASAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Rakesh, Mr.Bhaskar and Ms.Priya Mahajan, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP + CRL.A. 593/2013 MUNNA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Rakesh, Mr.Bhaskar and Ms.Priya Mahajan, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP + CRL.A. 630/2013 KALLU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Rakesh, Mr.Bhaskar and Ms.Priya Mahajan, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 26th February, 2008, an information was received in the Police Control Room with respect to quarrel over teasing of a girl, in Gali No.3, Swaroop Nagar, Mukundkam Extension. The information when conveyed to Police Station Swaroo...
Sharad P Jagtiani Vs. M/S Edelweiss Securities Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:3. March, 2014. + CS(OS) 461/2011 SHARAD P JAGTIANI Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms. Ira Gupta & Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Advs. versus M/S EDELWEISS SECURITIES LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Madhukar Pandey with Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.46,71,768.29p from the defendant, pleading that he was trading in financial markets through the defendant who is a member of the National Stock Exchange and a sum of Rs.46,71,768.29p is due to the plaintiff from the defendant on account of such transactions.2. Summons of the suit were issued and a written statement contesting the suit claim has been filed by the defendant. Para 3 of the preliminary objections of the said written statement is as under:-3. That this Honble Court lacks the necessary jurisdiction to entertain and decide the present Suit in view of Clause 13...
Abdul Kadir @ Adil Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 02.2014 Date of Decision:03. 03.2014 % + CRL.A. 373 of 2010 KASHI RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 727 of 2010 ABDUL KADIR @ ADIL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. CRL.A. 778 of 2010 DHARMENDER @ AJAY Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. Versus STATE Through: Crl. A. Nos.373, 727, 778, 825 of 2010 ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 825 of 2010 RAJNU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 3.4.2008, the police control room was informed that 4-5 armed persons had entered the house of the informant in AE Block of Shalimar Bagh. The information, when transmitted to Police Station Shalimar Bagh, was recorded vide DD No.6A, copy of which w...
Munna Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:25. 02.2014 Date of Decision:03. 03.2014 CRL.A. 592/2013 SINGHASAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Rakesh, Mr.Bhaskar and Ms.Priya Mahajan, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP + CRL.A. 593/2013 MUNNA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Rakesh, Mr.Bhaskar and Ms.Priya Mahajan, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP + CRL.A. 630/2013 KALLU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Rakesh, Mr.Bhaskar and Ms.Priya Mahajan, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 26th February, 2008, an information was received in the Police Control Room with respect to quarrel over teasing of a girl, in Gali No.3, Swaroop Nagar, Mukundkam Extension. The information when conveyed to Police Station Swaroo...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »