Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thakur Rangji Maharaj Trust Vs. A.J. Printers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h March, 2014. % + CS(OS) 2813/2011 THAKUR RANGJI MAHARAJ TRUST ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Mr. S.T. Srinivasan and Ms. Richa Dhawan, Advs. Versus A.J.PRINTERS Through: ..... Defendant Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for the relief of recovery of possession of ground floor portion of property no.97, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi 110 003 and for recovery of arrears of rent of Rs.55,825/- and mesne profits/damages for use and occupation for the period from 1st February, 2011 till the date of institution of the suit on 26th August, 2011 of Rs.21 lacs and for future mesne profits/damages for use and occupation @ Rs.10,000/- per day, pleading:(a) that the plaintiff let out the portion consisting of three rooms, drawing-cum-dining, pantry, kitchen, two servants quarters and one garage on ...
Smt. Rajeshwari Vs. Sh. Shiv Chaudhary and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:5. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.727/2013 & CM No.12233/2013 SMT. RAJESHWARI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Dubey, Advocate. Versus SH. SHIV CHAUDHARY & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 14.08.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.1,37,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount in favour of the appellant for the injuries received in the accident.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount noted above.3. The Appeal is accompanied by an application under consideration which is for condonation of delay of 252 days in filing the appeal.4. Before considering the...
Ravinder Kumar Vs. Nct of Delhi (State)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 24, 2014 Decision on: March 5, 2014 CRL.A. No.64 of 2008 RAVINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh with Mr. Atul T.N., Advocates. versus NCT OF DELHI (STATE) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP for State with ASI Ramesh Chand, Narcotics Cell, Crime. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0503.2014 1. Ravinder Kumar, in this appeal challenges the impugned judgment dated 27th August 2007 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS in SC No.23/N/04 convicting him under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) and the order on sentence dated 30th August 2007 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for ten years with fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default to undergo further simple imprisonment (SI) for six months.2. At the outset it must be noticed that in the order on sentence dated 30th August 2007 itself, the trial Court noticed that the Appellant had...
Sonam Gaurang Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:05. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 1291/2010 NARENDER Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Dinesh Chander Yadav, Adv. STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1292/2010 NARENDER Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Dinesh Chander Yadav, Adv. STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1523/2011 SONAM GAURANG Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 08.03.2008, ASI Om Prakash Yadav informed the Police Station Kapashera that during the course of checking, he had seen two boys snatching a Qualis bearing registration number HR38HT6812 On receipt of the information, ASI M.S. Yadav of the aforesaid police station, along with other police officials, reached the police picket, Bajgera, where ASI Om Prakash handed over to him two boys na...
Ram Swarup Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 128 of 2008 RAM SWARUP Through: ..... Appellant Mr. B.S. Chowdhary and Mr. Anshul Baranwal, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0503.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15th January 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge in CC No.68/99 and the order on sentence dated 16th January 2008 convicting the Appellant of the offence under Section 7/13 (1) (d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 120-B Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and a fine of Rs. 2,500, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months for the offence under Section 7 IPC.2. There were three accused before the learned trial Court, and, by the same judgment, one of the co-accused, Gianender Singh was acquitted. The appeal of the other co-accused Mahavir Singh wh...
Govt of Nct of Delhi Vs. Santosh Rani and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA322013 % 05.03.2014 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through Mr. V.K. Tandon, Mr. Kartik Jindal, Advocates versus SANTOSH RANI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mrs. Abha Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2/UOI. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC impugns the judgment of the first appellate court dated 17.7.2012. First appellate court set aside the judgment of the trial court dated 17.5.2010 dismissing the suit of the respondent/plaintiff filed for recovery of moneys claimed on the ground that respondent/plaintiff was a displaced person on accounts of terrorist activities in Punjab. First appellate court has decreed the suit and RSA322013 Page 1 granted subsistence allowance of Rs.1000/- per month from 18.12.1990 to 16.12.1995 and from 16.8.1996 to 31.3.1997.2....
Gurucharan Singh Wason Vs. Praful Prakash Ramanand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: March 05, 2014 RC.REV. 418/2012 & C.M. Nos.14364/2012 & 3914/2013 GURUCHARAN SINGH WASON ..... Petitioner Through Mr. M. Mohsin Israily, Advocate. versus PRAFUL PRAKASH RAMANAND ..... Respondent Through Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) has assailed the order dated 24th June, 2012 passed by the learned Trial Court dismissing the review application filed by the petitioner against the eviction order/judgment dated 4th November, 2009.2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an eviction petition bearing No.E-24/10 against the petitioner on the ground of bonafide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Act in respect of one shop forming part of property bearing No.F14/10 Model Town-II, Delhi si...
Sudha Choudhary and ors. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.45/2013 5th March, 2014 % SUDHA CHOUDHARY & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vibhu Shankar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 impugning the judgment dated 30.10.2012 which has dismissed the claim petition filed by the applicants/appellants who are the dependants of the deceased Sh. Parveen Chaudhary who died on account of an untoward incident of a fall from the train at the Tughlakabad railway station while travelling from Okhla to Faridabad in an EMU train on a valid monthly station ticket bearing no.56186820 having validity from 12.4.2010 to 11.5.2010.2. I may note that earlier the Tribunal had passed a judgment on 15.7.2011 dismissing the claim petition but a learned Single Judge of t...
Dps Gullani Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank Thr. Its Chairman
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RSA No.71/2014 5th March, 2014 DPS GULLANI Through: ......Appellant Appellant in person. VERSUS PUNJAB & SIND BANK THR. ITS CHAIRMAN ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Jagat Arora, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.4216/2014(delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA712014 1. At this stage, I must state that one appeal cannot be filed against two orders, one of dismissal of the first appeal by the court below as barred by limitation and the second/subsequent order dismissing the review petition against the final order, and therefore I am taking this regular second appeal as being filed against the original order dated 16.9.2013.2. The first appeal no doubt has been dismissed as barred by limitation and ordinarily this Court would have been inclined to allow condonation of delay and r...
Manish Kumar Vs. Hemlata
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: March 05, 2014 RC.REV. 15/2013, C.M. Nos.540/2013, 809/2013 & 1138/2013 MANISH KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Mohit Chaudhary, Adv. with Ms.Damini Chawla, Adv. versus HEMLATA Through ..... Respondent Ms.Manisha Agrawal Narain, Adv. AND + C.R.P. 77/2013 & C.M. No.6576/2013 MANISH KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Mohit Chaudhary, Adv. with Ms.Damini Chawla, Adv. versus HEMLATA SHARMA Through ..... Respondent Ms.Manisha Agrawal Narain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Section 115 of CPC, the petitioner has assailed the eviction order dated 26th March, 2013 passed by the learned Addl. Rent Controller whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner was dismissed for the reason mainly that the same was not filed within the stipulated period prescribed under the Act.2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »