Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandre (Deceased) Through Lrs and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI L.A. Appeal No.311/2013 6th March, 2014 % CHANDRE (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.C. Gulia, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2/DDA. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M.Nos.19369/2013 (condonation of delay in filing) and 19370/2013 (condonation of delay in re-filing) 1. For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed subject to the condition that for the period of delay in filing and re-filing the appeal, no interest will be payable to the appellants. C.M.s stand disposed of. + L.A. Appeal No.311/2013 2. The issue in the present case is of enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with respect to land in village Dhool Siras covered under the Award No.27/200203 for notification under Section 4 dated 13.12.2000....
Amarjeet Kaur Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 306/1999 AMARJEET KAUR ..... Appellant Through: None. versus STATE Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel (Cri.) for State with Mr.Harendra K.Singh, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Police Headquarters, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA ORDER0603.2014 Fresh affidavit has been filed by Mr. Harendra K. Singh, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Police Headquarters, New Delhi. Mr. Harendra K.Singh, DCP is also present in court. Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel (Cri.) for State submits that so far the previous list of 365 life convicts is concerned, majority of the appellants of these appeals were personally informed in writing about the listing of their appeals before the various Division Benches of this court. Learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) further submits that there are few cases where the concerned SHOs could not establish any p...
Sanjay Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:06. 03.2014 CRL.A. 1144/2013 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Inderpal Khokhar, Adv. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CRL.A. 1261/2013 MEHFOOJ @ MONU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State + CRL.A. 1324/2013 PRAVEEN MALIK & ORS. Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Anand, Adv. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 27.09.2009, the Police Control Room (PCR) was informed of the passengers in Himalayan Queen Train having been robbed between Narela and Holambi Kalan Railway Station. The information when conveyed to the Police Station Old Delhi Railway Station, was recorded vide DD No.20, copy of which is Ex.PW19/A, and its copy was given to ASI Rameshwar Dass for...
Arz Unique Enterprises Limited Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
#31 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1519/2014 ARZ UNIQUE ENTERPRISES LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA Through ..... Respondent Ms. Anjana Gosain with Mr. Pradeep Desodya, Advocates Date of Decision :06. h March, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM APPL. 3163/2014 in W.P.(C) 1519/2014 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1519/2014 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to amend their guidelines for classifying and categorizing hotels as five star hotels.2. Mr. S.N. Gupta, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the mandatory requirements of having a multi-cuisine restaurant and a bar in a five star hotel is violative of fundamental right of a citizen enshrined under Article 19 of the Constitution.3. Mr. Gupta states that classification of a hotel as five star as prescribed under the impugned guidelines is also violative of Articl...
Mehfooj @ Monu Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:06. 03.2014 CRL.A. 1144/2013 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Inderpal Khokhar, Adv. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CRL.A. 1261/2013 MEHFOOJ @ MONU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State + CRL.A. 1324/2013 PRAVEEN MALIK & ORS. Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Anand, Adv. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 27.09.2009, the Police Control Room (PCR) was informed of the passengers in Himalayan Queen Train having been robbed between Narela and Holambi Kalan Railway Station. The information when conveyed to the Police Station Old Delhi Railway Station, was recorded vide DD No.20, copy of which is Ex.PW19/A, and its copy was given to ASI Rameshwar Dass for...
Sh. Chhinda Vs. Ms. Sunita JaIn and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.37/2003 Reserved on:19. h February, 2014 Pronounced on:6th March, 2014 % SH. CHHINDA Through: ......Appellant Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. VERSUS MS. SUNITA JAIN & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. B.P. Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the appellant/defendant impugning the judgment of the first appellate court dated 26.11.2002 by which the first appellate court allowed the appeal of the respondents/plaintiffs and decreed their suit for possession by setting aside the judgment of the trial court dated 18.2.2002 which had dismissed the suit for possession.2. The facts of the case are that the respondents/plaintiffs are the owners of plot no.M-6, Mehrauli Road, New Delhi and which was purchased by them vide registered conveyance deed dated 2.7.1969 from DLF Housing Construction Pvt. Ltd. The appellant/...
Amar Singh Sharma Vs. Ganga Ram Sharma (Since Deceased Through Lrs) an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR. P. (C) No.120/2013 6th March, 2014 % AMAR SINGH SHARMA Through: Versus ..... Petitioner Ms. Amita Babbar, Advocate. GANGA RAM SHARMA (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The only ground pleaded for transfer of the suit pending in Tis Hazari Courts to Saket Courts is ill health of the petitioner. By an administrative order, Honble the Chief Justice has directed continuation of certain cases which have been filed up to a particular year in the same Courts in which they are filed, while other cases were transferred after bifurcation of Courts to the Courts having territorial jurisdiction, and which administrative decision was on account of requirement of equal distribution of works among the Courts.2. Merely on the ground that there is inconvenience to the petitioner the suit cannot be transferred mor...
Trilochan Singh Bhatia Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
#34 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7181/2010 TRILOCHAN SINGH BHATIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A. Maitri with Ms. Radhika Chandershekhar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Date of Decision :06. h March, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed primarily seeking a direction to restrain respondent nos. 2 and 3 from terminating/cancelling the petitioners allotment of STD/ISD/PCO booth at Railway Yatri Niwas, New Delhi. Petitioner also challenges the policy/guidelines/notification No.2000/TG/IV/10/P/STD/PCO dated 20th October, 2009 issued by the Railway Board.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that petitioner is a physically handicapped person who had been allocated an STD/ISD/PCO booth by respondent No.2 in Delhi in 1991.3. Subsequently, agreement for fixed period was executed between the parties. Admittedly, ...
Vineet Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
#33 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7180/2010 VINEET KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A. Maitri with Ms. Radhika Chandershekhar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Date of Decision :06. h March, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed primarily seeking a direction to restrain respondent nos. 2 and 3 from terminating/cancelling the petitioners allotment of STD/ISD/PCO booth at Railway Yatri Niwas, New Delhi. Petitioner also challenges the policy/guidelines/notification No.2000/TG/IV/10/P/STD/PCO dated 20th October, 2009 issued by the Railway Board.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that petitioner is a physically handicapped person who had been allocated an STD/ISD/PCO booth by respondent No.2 in Delhi in 1997.3. Subsequently, agreement for fixed period was executed between the parties. Admittedly, as ...
Kuldeep Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
#35 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7182/2010 KULDEEP SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A. Maitri with Ms. Radhika Chandershekhar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Date of Decision :06. h March, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed primarily seeking a direction to restrain respondent nos. 2 and 3 from terminating/cancelling the petitioners allotment of STD/ISD/PCO booth at Railway Yatri Niwas, New Delhi. Petitioner also challenges the policy/guidelines/notification No.2000/TG/IV/10/P/STD/PCO dated 20th October, 2009 issued by the Railway Board.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that petitioner is a physically handicapped person who had been allocated an STD/ISD/PCO booth by respondent No.2 in Delhi in 1993.3. Subsequently, agreement for fixed period was executed between the parties. Admittedly, as of tod...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »