Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Bhushan Khatri Vs. I.G.i.P.Ed. and Sport Sciences and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
$~59-60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h March, 2014 % + WP(C) No.1898/1995 BHARAT BHUSHAN KHATRI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Shanker Raju and Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advocates. Versus I.G.I.P.ED. & SPORT SCIENCES & ORS. Represented by: ...... Respondents Mr. G. Tushar Rao and Mr. D.S.V. Krishnajee, Advocates for respondents 1,2 and 3. AND + WP(C) No.4392/1995 GOPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju and Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advocates. Versus I.G.I.P.ED. & SPORT SCIENCES & ORS. Represented by: WP(C) Nos. 1898/1995 & 4392/1995 ...... Respondents Mr. G. Tushar Rao and Mr. D.S.V. Krishnajee, Advocates for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. In WP(C) No.1898/1995, show cause notice dated 04.05.1995 is under challenge which reads as under: The Review Committee in its report of Meeting held on 6.3.1995 observed the following discrepancies/irregularities in your appointment as Assistant and subsequent temporary...
Smt. Geeta Pal and anr. Vs. Sh. Kashmir Khan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:6. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.674 /2013 SMT. GEETA PAL & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Ms. Monika for Mr.S.N. Parashar, Advocate. Versus SH. KASHMIR KHAN & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Archana Gaur, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 13.08.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.7,16,528/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition, i.e., 31.08.2009 till the notice under Order XXI Rule 1 was given by the Insurance Company.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation as noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has argued solely on the ground that the learned Tribunal has not considered the income of the deceased ...
New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Harjeet Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:6. h March, 2014 MAC.APP. 337/2007 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. D. K. Sharma, Adv. versus HARJEET SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Manjeet Chawla and Ms. Sunan Roy, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 05.03.1007, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.60,000/- with interest @ 7% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that driver of the offending vehicle was not having any driving licence and in such eventuality, Ld. Tribunal ought to have exonerated the appellant from any liability. However, directed the appellant to pay the compensation amount in favour of the claimant with recovery rights against the driver and owner of the offendi...
Sanjiv Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
$~R-136 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 06, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6655/2003 SANJIV KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Advocate with Mr.Randhir Kumar, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that on July 15, 1994 the petitioner was appointed in CISF as a Constable. On July 22, 2002 he was detailed to perform duty as baggage lifter/handler at the X-Ray outlet located on the right side of Security Hold Area (SHA) of Domestic Terminal of NSCBIA Airport, Kolkata.2. On July 22, 2002 at about 07.00 P.M. one N.Mohan Lal who was travelling to Mumbai by Sahara Flight No.S-2224 complained that a mobile phone was missing from his hand baggage after it was put through the X-ray machine when his baggage...
Praveen Malik and ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:06. 03.2014 CRL.A. 1144/2013 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Inderpal Khokhar, Adv. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CRL.A. 1261/2013 MEHFOOJ @ MONU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State + CRL.A. 1324/2013 PRAVEEN MALIK & ORS. Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Anand, Adv. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 27.09.2009, the Police Control Room (PCR) was informed of the passengers in Himalayan Queen Train having been robbed between Narela and Holambi Kalan Railway Station. The information when conveyed to the Police Station Old Delhi Railway Station, was recorded vide DD No.20, copy of which is Ex.PW19/A, and its copy was given to ASI Rameshwar Dass for...
Major Saurbh Charan and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
36 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1497/2014 & CM APPL. 3124/2014 MAJOR SAURBH CHARAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bharat Singh, Mr. M.K. Ghosh and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocates. versus LT. GOVERNOR DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Senior Advocate with Mr. V.K. Tandon, and Mr. Yogesh Saini, Advocates for respondents. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate for Intervener/ Social Jurist. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ORDER0603.2014 % Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 27 th February, 2014 issued by the Lieutenant Government, NCT of Delhi whereby 05 points for Inter State Transfer have been abolished. The said Order dated 27th February, 2014 further inter alia directs If the school has conducted draw of lots for those applicants securing 70 points, that draw shall remain valid for the selected/confirmed candidates only. Fresh draw of lots shall be held for remainin...
Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. Ltd. Vs. M/S BhasIn Infotech and Infrastruc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 06, 2014 OMP No.734/2012, I.A. Nos.18273/2012, 15789/2013 & 16946/2013 SHAPOORJI PALLONJI & CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.H.L.Tiku, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Aslam Ahmed, Mr.Babit Singh Jamwal, Mr.Puneet Singh Bindra, Mr.A.Menon & Mr.Shrivardhan Deshpande, Advs. versus M/S BHASIN INFOTECH & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravi Sikri, Adv. with Mr.Jenis Francis, Mr.Gaurav Beri & Ms.Neha Bhatnagar, Advs. AND + Arb.P. No.14/2013 SHAPOORJI PALLONJI & CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.H.L.Tiku, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Aslam Ahmed, Mr.Babit Singh Jamwal, Mr.Puneet Singh Bindra, Mr.A.Menon & Mr.Shrivardhan Deshpande, Advs. versus M/S BHASIN INFOTECH & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravi Sikri, Adv. with Mr.Jenis Francis, Mr.Gaurav Beri & Ms.Neha Bhatnagar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...
AllauddIn Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h February, 2014 DECIDED ON :6. h March, 2014 + CRL.A. 1038/2013 ALLAUDDIN ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Arundhati Katju, Advocate. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 877/2011 KULDEEP SINGH @ KALLI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.B.S.Chaudhary with Mr.Anshul Baranwal, Advocates. Versus STATE + ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A. 734/2013 KULDEEP SINGH @ KALLI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.B.S.Chaudhary with Mr.Anshul Baranwal, Advocates. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 873/2011 MAHENDER @ DHARMENDER ..... Appellant Through : Mr.B.S.Chaudhary with Mr.Anshul Baranwal, Advocates. Versus STATE + ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A. 793/2012 TINKU @ DANISH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P...
United India Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Raj Bala and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:6. h March, 2014 MAC.APP. 450/2004 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus RAJ BALA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Punya Rekha Angara, Adv. / Amicus Curiae for R7 and R8. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Adv. for R9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 07.08.2004, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs. 15,45,824/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant argued the present appeal on the sole ground that the driver of the offending vehicle was not having valid driving licence at the time of the accident. Despite, the Ld. Tribunal has not granted recovery rights in favour of the appellant.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the ...
Sneh JaIn Vs. Vijay Kalra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:06. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 1011 of 2013 S.K. JAIN ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay K. Chopra, Adv. Through: versus VIJAY KALRA ..... Respondent Ms. Vasudha V. Indurkar, Adv. Through: + CRL.A. 1012 of 2013 SNEH JAIN ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay K. Chopra, Adv. Through: versus VIJAY KALRA ..... Respondent Ms. Vasudha V. Indurkar, Adv. Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The appellant in Crl. A. No.1011/2013, namely Shri S.K. Jain is the husband of the appellant in Crl. A. No.1012/2013, namely Smt. Sneh Jain. Two separate complaints one by Shri S.K. Jain and the other by Smt. Sneh Jain, were filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the N.I. Act). It was alleged in the complaint filed by Shri S.K. Jain that in September, 2002, the respondent/accused approached him and his wife for a loan of Rs.31.00 lakh. The complainant, Shri S.K. Jain, was earlier running a ...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »