Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Saleem and ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 20, 2014 Decision on: March 7, 2014 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1314 of 2011 MOHD. SALEEM & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr. Hilal Haider, Mr. Adit S. Pujaria and Mr. Vaibhav Sethi, Advocates for A-1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for A-4. Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Advocate for A-5. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. AND DEATH SENTENCE REF No.3 of 2011 STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. versus MOHD. SALEEM & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr. Hilal Haider, Mr. Adit S. Pujaria and Mr. Vaibhav Sethi, Advocates for A-1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for A-4. Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Advocate for A-5. CORAM: HONBLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA JUDGMENT0703.2014 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.Introduction 1. By the judgment dated 3rd September 2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-02 (North), Delhi in SC No.35/11. ...
The Director General (Works), Cpwd, Nirman Bhawan, Vs. Suresh Pal and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on March 05, 2014 Judgment Delivered on March 07, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6852/2009 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (WORKS), CPWD, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. R.V.Sinha with Mr. P.K.Singh, Advocate versus SURESH PAL AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Varun Prasad, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated July 21, 2005 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (Industrial Tribunal in short), whereby the Industrial Tribunal has answered the reference by directing, that the respondent be regularised from the date of grant of temporary status to the respondent with effect from September 01, 1993.2. At the outset, it may be stated here that the petitioner has challenged the award qua two persons namely S/Shri Suresh Pal and Man Singh. Later, on May 13, 2009, the counsel for the petitioner had...
Mohd. Sakeel Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :7. h MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A.No.1080/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.3932/2014 MOHD. SAKEEL Through : ..... Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Mohd. Sakeel (the appellant) questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 31.03.2012 in Sessions Case No.137/11 arising out of FIR No.267/08 registered at Police Station Dabri by which he was convicted for committing offences under Sections 395/412 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 09.04.2012 he was awarded rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine `25,000/- each under Section 395 and 412 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 12.05.2008 at about 11.45 A.M. at house No.RZ-B-2, Raghu Nagar, Pankha Road, Dabri, he and his associates committed decoity and deprived the complainan...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Poonam Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:7. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 392/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv. versus POONAM DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. for R1 to R6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 17.02.2012, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.19,31,488/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the date of the realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that Ld. Tribunal erred in not appreciating the fact that deceased was in a private job and there was no pleadings and evidence to show the future prospects. He submits that on the date of accident, deceased was 31 years of age, despite that Ld. Tribunal added 50% in his actual income for computing the loss ...
Ranbir Singh @pappu @ anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:04.03.2014 Judgment delivered on:07.03.2014 CRL.A.51-52/2006 RANBIR SINGH @PAPPU @ ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mr.Anirudh Yadav, Adv. Versus STATE Through .... Respondent Mr.Navin K. Jha, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 20.12.2005 & 21.12.2005 respectively wherein appellants Ranbir Singh @ Pappu and Rajesh @ Kala had been convicted under Sections 147/148/186/332/333/342/353 of the IPC. The charge-sheet had been filed against four persons but the other two persons namely Sunil and Dayanand stood acquitted. 2 Both the accused/appellants had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year for the offence under Sections 147/148 of the IPC; RI for 2 months for offence under Section 186 of the IPC; for offence under Section 332/333, they were sentenced to undergo RI for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500...
Brainsmart Media and Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indian Newspaper Societ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: March 07, 2014 + I.A. No.324/2014 in CS(OS) No.60/2014 BRAINSMART MEDIA AND ADVERTISING PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Deepali Gupta, Adv. versus INDIAN NEWSPAPER SOCIETY ..... Defendant Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Yogendra Misra & Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant. Along with the suit, the plaintiff also filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC, being I.A. No.324/2014. By this order, I propose to decide the said application.2. The plaintiff is an advertising agency having its registered office in Tamil Nadu and was earlier known by the name of Calai Campaigns Pvt. Ltd. The defendant is a society having as its members the newspapers and periodicals of the country. One of the maj...
Deepak Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:07. 03.2014 + Crl. Appeal No.621/2010 DEEPAK .Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu and Ms Shiba Batra, Advs. Versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 02.11.2014, Police Control Room was informed at about 11.15 PM that a person had been injured with knife in Sector 20, Rohini and one person was being beaten by the members of the public. A copy of the aforesaid DD was given to SI Satbir Singh, who reached the aforesaid spot and came to know that both the injured as well as the person who had been caught by the public had already been taken to Sanjay Gandhi Hospital. The Investigating Officer, accordingly, reached the aforesaid hospital, where Mangal and Virender Singh were found admitted. He recorded the statement of Virender Singh who, inter alia, stated that on the aforesaid date, at about 10.30 PM, he along with Mangal was going to his hous...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S. Lanco Infratech Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 03.2014 FAO(OS) 34/2006 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gupta, Advocate. Versus M/S. LANCO INFRATECH LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenges the order of 24th November, 2005 (impugned order), of the learned Single judge dismissing OMP431of 2005 (section 34 petition) as not disclosing any ground warranting interference under section 34 of the Act with the award of the Arbitral Tribunal dated 20th August, 2005, as modified by the order dated 3 rd October, 2005 (Award). The appellant primarily contends that the award was in excess of the contract that came into existence upon the award of tender by the appellant to the respondent for the proj...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) Vs. M/S Unibros and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 07, 2014 I.A. No.14278/2011 in OMP No.378/2009 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED (MTNL) ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ravi Sikri, Adv. with Mr.Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. versus M/S UNIBROS & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jagdish Vatsa, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. By this order I propose to decide the review application filed by the respondent No.1 under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 and Order 41 Rule 47 of the CPC for review of the judgment dated 4th July, 2011.2. The main argument of the respondent No.1 is that while passing the earlier order dated 5th May, 2003, the Court issued a direction that the objections filed by the petitioner under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as old Act) would be treated as an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...
State Vs. Mohd. Saleem and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 20, 2014 Decision on: March 7, 2014 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1314 of 2011 MOHD. SALEEM & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr. Hilal Haider, Mr. Adit S. Pujaria and Mr. Vaibhav Sethi, Advocates for A-1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for A-4. Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Advocate for A-5. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. AND DEATH SENTENCE REF No.3 of 2011 STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. versus MOHD. SALEEM & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr. Hilal Haider, Mr. Adit S. Pujaria and Mr. Vaibhav Sethi, Advocates for A-1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for A-4. Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Advocate for A-5. CORAM: HONBLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA JUDGMENT0703.2014 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.Introduction 1. By the judgment dated 3rd September 2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-02 (North), Delhi in SC No.35/11. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »