Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Nanda Vs. L and T Finance Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: March 10, 2014 + O.M.P. No.858/2011 SUNIL NANDA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. with Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. versus L & T FINANCE LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Amit Bajaj, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the abovementioned petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Mr.Sunil Nanda, the petitioner, against the impugned Award dated 29th July, 2011 published by the sole Arbitrator.2. The present petition involves the question, whether a guarantor for a loan, who is not a party to the loan agreement which contains an arbitration clause, admittedly executed between the lender, namely, L & T Finance Ltd. (respondent No.1 herein) and borrower, namely, Mr.Aditya Talwar (respondent No.2 herein) can be made a party to a reference to arbitration with regard to a dispute relating to repayment o...
Shishu Bhan Singh @ Bablu Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :10. h MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A. 491/2011 RAM LADETH @ RAJESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Karamveer Singh, Advocate with Mr.S.R.Rawat, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : AND + Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CRL.A. 1303/2011 SHISHU BHAN SINGH @ BABLU Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Srilina Roy, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Ram Ladeth @ Rajesh (A-1) and Shishu Bhan Singh @ Bablu (A-2) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 15.03.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.213/09 arising out of FIR No.40/09 PS Okhla Industrial Area by which they were held guilty under Section 324 IPC for inflicting injuries simple in nature by sharp object to Guddi @ Sunita in furtherance of common intention along with one Shyam Babu Dubey @ Pandit (not arrested) on 03.02.2009 at around 10.50 P.M. n...
Ram Ladeth @ Rajesh Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :10. h MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A. 491/2011 RAM LADETH @ RAJESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Karamveer Singh, Advocate with Mr.S.R.Rawat, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : AND + Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CRL.A. 1303/2011 SHISHU BHAN SINGH @ BABLU Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Srilina Roy, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Ram Ladeth @ Rajesh (A-1) and Shishu Bhan Singh @ Bablu (A-2) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 15.03.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.213/09 arising out of FIR No.40/09 PS Okhla Industrial Area by which they were held guilty under Section 324 IPC for inflicting injuries simple in nature by sharp object to Guddi @ Sunita in furtherance of common intention along with one Shyam Babu Dubey @ Pandit (not arrested) on 03.02.2009 at around 10.50 P.M. n...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chintamani and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.699/2010 & CM No.18866/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Represented by: Versus .....Appellants Ms. Savita Singh, Advocate. CHINTAMANI & ORS. ..... Respondents Mr. R.S.Gulia, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Represented by: AND + MAC.APP. No.743/2010 & CM No.19852/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Represented by: Versus .....Appellants Ms. Savita Singh, Advocate. SANJAY RAJPUT & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. R.S.Gulia, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Both these appeals are preferred by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the common judgment and order dated 07.07.2010 passed in Petition No.843/2004, titled as hintamani Arya Vs. Davinder Pal Singh and Petition No.842/2004, titled as Sanjay Rajput Vs. Davinder Pal Singh, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.1,51,712/- and Rs.85,000...
Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. M/S. Sheesh Mahal Restaurant
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.146/2012 10th March, 2014 % EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.P. Mavi, Advocate. Versus M/S. SHEESH MAHAL RESTAURANT Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appears for the respondent in spite of service.2. This first appeal is filed under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the impugned order of the ESI Court dated 25.2.2012 by which the ESI Court, at the stage of final arguments, has remanded the matter to the competent authority under the Act for fresh adjudication. This is stated to have been done after 15 years of pendency of the case, which is an original proceeding, and which was initiated by the respondent herein before the ESI Court.3. Learned counsel for the appellant argues that proceedings which are initiated under Sect...
Philip Morris Products S.a and anr Vs. Sameer and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:31. 10.2013 Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2014 CS(OS) 1723/2010 and I.A. 11288/2010 PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A & ANR Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Nishchal Anand, Advocate. versus SAMEER & ORS ..... Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This suit, to claim permanent injunction against infringement of trademarks & passing off, delivery up, damages etc against the defendants, claiming infringement of plaintiffs trademarks MARLBORO and the ROOF Device (hereinafter referred to as suit trademarks), was originally filed by Philip Morris Products S.A. (hereinafter referred to as the original plaintiff no.1) and Philip Morris Services India S.A., plaintiff no.2 herein.2. Original Plaintiff no.1, Philip Morris Products S.A., is a company duly organised and existing under the laws of Switzerland having its principal place of business in Switzerland. Plaintiff No.2, Philip Morr...
Philip Morris Products S.a and anr Vs. Anil Kumar Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:29. 11.2013 % + Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2014 CS(OS) 500/2010 and I.A. 3545/2010 PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A & ANR Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Nishchal Anand, Advocate. versus ANIL KUMAR SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This suit, to claim permanent injunction against infringement of trademarks & passing off, delivery up, damages etc against the defendants, claiming infringement of plaintiffs trademarks MARLBORO and the ROOF Device (hereinafter referred to as suit trademarks), was originally filed by Philip Morris Products S.A. (hereinafter referred to as the original plaintiff no.1) and Philip Morris Services India S.A., plaintiff no.2 herein.2. Original Plaintiff no.1, Philip Morris Products S.A., is a company duly organised and existing under the laws of Switzerland having its principal place of business in Switzerland. Plaintiff No.2, Phi...
Royal Educational and Social Welfare Society Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 691/2013 & CM APPL. 1313/2013 ROYAL EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Mandeep S. Vinaik with Mr. Deepak, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Yogesh Saini, Advocate for Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. Reserved on :14. h February, 2014 Date of Decision :10. h March, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the termination order dated 04th January, 2013 whereby the petitioner's contract for mid-day meal had been cancelled. Petitioner has also prayed for permission to bid for fresh contracts for the supply of mid-day meal in schools run by the Delhi Government.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that on 29th September, 2009, a Memorandum of Understanding was executed between the petitioner-Society and the respondents by virtue of which petitioner was given contract till 28th Septembe...
Hc Ramkesh Meena Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 14 of 2008 Reserved on: February 24, 2014 Date of decision: March 10, 2014 HC RAMKESH MEENA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.K. Malik, Mr. Jagdeep Sharma, Mr. Rahul Raj Mehra & Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP and Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. With CRL.A. 68 of 2008 TEJ SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Ashikesh Gupta, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP and Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. With CRL.A. 35 of 2008 H.C.NAMONARAYAN MEENA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP and Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. With CRL.A. 41 of 2008 RAJENDER PRASAD (Constable) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.R. Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP and Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. With CRL.A. 36 of 2008 HC BALBIR SINGH .......
Amit Kumar Chauhan Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:10. 03.2014 + Crl. Appeal No.804/2013 & Crl. M(B) 1312/2013 AMIT KUMAR CHAUHAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms Alpana Pandey, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms Ritu Gauba, APP for the State. Inspector Rajendra Meena, PS R.K. Puram CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 11.07.2009, Police Control Room received information with respect to quarrelling and stabbing by knife at Anuj Vihar Gate. The information, when conveyed to the Police Station Delhi Cantt., was recorded there vide DD No.34A, a copy of which was given to ASI Bhoop Singh for investigation. When the Investigating Officer reached the aforesaid spot, no eye-witness met him there and he came to know that the injured had been taken, by his family members, to Safdarjung Hospital. The Investigating Officer thereupon reached Safdarjung Hospital, where he came to know that the injured had been taken to the Operation Theatr...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »