Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajiv Singh Vs. M/S. Special Cables (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on March 12, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6151/2013 RAJIV SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajnish K.Jha, Advocate versus M/S. SPECIAL CABLES (P) LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pradhuman Gautam, Advocate with Ms.Saumitra Singhal, Advocate W.P.(C) 6157/2013 KISHAN KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajnish K.Jha, Advocate versus M/S. SPECIAL CABLES (P) LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pradhuman Gautam, Advocate with Ms.Saumitra Singhal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. These two writ petitions arise from a common award dated July 06, 2013 passed by the Labour Court in D.I.D No.275/2010 and 276/2010, whereby the Labour Court has directed the reinstatement of the petitioners in the services of the respondent with continuity of service however, without any back wages.2. The brief facts are that it is the case of the petitioners that they were appointed as Operators in the yea...
Mala Puri Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.127/2013 & CM No.4095/2013 12th March, 2014 % MALA PURI Through: ......Appellant Mr. Dilip Singh and Ms. Roshan Ara Khan, Adv. VERSUS KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. & ANR. ...... Respondents. Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Adv. for R-1 alongwith Sandeep Mehta, Manager of R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. On 24.2.2014 the following order was passed:1. Counsel for the respondent No.1 wants to take instructions from the bank in view of the fact that rates of interest charged pre-litigation are 37% per annum and Award grants interest @ 18% per annum, and both of which rates are prima facie against the public policy and the ratio of a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Pandit Munshi Ram Associates Vs. DDA2010(3) Arb. Law Reporter 284. I may also note that it is not known whether the pre-litigation interest of 37% per annum is with monthly rest or quar...
Nestle India Ltd. Vs. State of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:12.03.2014. CRL.REV.P. 368/2012 NESTLE INDIA LTD. Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Rajesh Batra and Mr.Amit Agarwal, Advocates. versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 This revision petition is directed against the impugned order dated 01.12.2011 whereby the charge had been framed against the petitioner company for violating the provisions of Sections 3, 6 (1)(a), 6 (1)(b) & 6 (1)(c) of the Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation of Productions, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the IMS Act). A detailed order had been passed. 2 The petitioner submits that in view of the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, the controversy which was raging before the trial Court pursuant to which the aforenoted charge has been framed against him ...
Regional Director, Esic Vs. M/S. Girdhari Lal and Sons Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.281/2011 12th March, 2014 % REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESIC Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.P. Mavi, Advocate. Versus M/S. GIRDHARI LAL & SONS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Arjun S. Bawa, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed by the ESI department under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the judgment of the ESI Court dated 17.1.2011 which has remanded the matter to the assessing authority to enable the respondent herein (petitioner before the trial court in the petition under Section 75 of the Act) to show its records as to whether the employees employed by the respondent herein were less than 10 in number as claimed by the respondent.2. I may note that the ESI Court holds issue no.2 in favour of the appellant and yet has remanded the matter to the assessing authority. ...
Union of India Vs. M/S Sri Krishna Paper Mills
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:7. th February, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on:12. th March, 2014 + OMP1132014 U NION O F INDIA ..... P E TITIONER Through: Mr. Jaswinder Advocate Singh , versus M/S S RI K RISHNA P APER M ILLS Through: ..... R ESPONDENT Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The Petitioner, Union of India has filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) seeking setting aside of the award dated 30.9.2013 read with additional award dated 8.10.2013.2. The Respondents had bid for the tender invited by the ======================================================================= Petitioner for supply of 305 metric tons paper. The Respondent was found to be L1 and by acceptance dated 19.02.2010, the contract was awarded to the Respondents. As per the contract, the Petitioner could accept the goods to the extent of 305 metr...
Pardeep @ Sandy Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:04. 03.2014 Date of Decision:12. 03.2014 CRL.A. 719/2013 PARDEEP @ SANDY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. + CRL.A. 720/2013 DEEPAK @ GHODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 165/2014 PAWAN @ TAU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 29.08.2010, about about 12.45 pm, an information was received that a person had been robbed of his motorcycle Bajaj Discover, red colour, bearing registration number DL8 NC4908at Bawana Road, DSIDC, H-Block, Main Road. The information when conveyed to Police Station Bawana, wa...
Ponty Singh Vs. Anu Singh Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: January 21, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: March 12, 2014 % + RFA(OS) 12/2014 PONTY SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and Ms.Megha Katari, Advocates versus ANU SINGH BHATIA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.P.Banerjee, Ms.Princy and Ms.Harleen Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned order dated January 06, 2014 the learned Single Judge has dismissed CS (OS) 820/2012 opining it to be infructuous for the reason in the suit filed by the appellant, in which his wife was a defendant, prayer made was to restrain the wife from initiating any proceedings against the appellant in Singapore. Before summons in the anti suit injunction filed by the appellant was served upon the respondent she had already initiated divorce proceedings in a ...
Rajvir Singh Mann Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : March 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : March 12, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1522/2003 RAJ VIR SINGH MANN Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Meenal Kashyap, Advocate with Mr.B.A.Jadon, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The facts leading to filing of the present petition are that on September 23, 1987, the petitioner was appointed in CISF on the post of SI/Executive. In the month of March 1995 the petitioner was sent on deputation to the Intelligence Bureau where he was working on the post of ACIO-II/G at Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi.2. On March 23, 1996, one Ms.Dipannita Bose made a complaint to the Assistant Commissioner of Police, IGI Airport, New Delhi that on March 23, 1996, she was travelling to Hongkong; the officer p...
Pawan @ Tau Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:04. 03.2014 Date of Decision:12. 03.2014 CRL.A. 719/2013 PARDEEP @ SANDY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. + CRL.A. 720/2013 DEEPAK @ GHODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 165/2014 PAWAN @ TAU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 29.08.2010, about about 12.45 pm, an information was received that a person had been robbed of his motorcycle Bajaj Discover, red colour, bearing registration number DL8 NC4908at Bawana Road, DSIDC, H-Block, Main Road. The information when conveyed to Police Station Bawana, wa...
Sabina Sablok Vs. Promila Mehra and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. th January 2014 Judgment pronounced on:12. th March 2014 CS(OS) 42/2010 S ABINA S ABLOK ..... P LAIN TIFF Through Mr. Ashish Bhagat, Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary and Ms. Manish Suri, Advocates Versus P ROMILA M EHRA & ANO THER Through ..... D E FENDAN TS Mr. Lovekesh Advocate Sawhney, CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.7,16,66,666/- (Rupees seven crores sixteen lakhs sixty six thousand six hundred and sixty six only) being one-third share of 50% of the undivided share left behind by her father late Sh. Prem Mehra in residential property being No.208, Golf Links, Ne w ======================================================================= Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the suit property).2. Plaintiff and Defendant No.2 are sisters and the daughters of Defendant No . 1, Mrs. Promila Mehra and Late Mr. Prem Mehra. The grandfather...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »