Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Lal Maurya Vs. M/S. Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:19. th February, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on:13. th March, 2014 OMP1322014 B HARAT LA L M AURYA ..... P E TITIONER Through: Ms. Sneh Lata Srivastava, Advocate versus M/S . GODREJ & B OYCE M FG . C O . L TD Through: ...... R ESPONDEN T Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Advocate with Mr. Raji Abraham, AR of the Respondent. ********* OMP. 133/2014 M/S . S ANGUINE E NTERPR ISES P V T. L TD Through: .... P ETITIONER Ms. Sneh Lata Srivastava, Advocate versus M/S . GODREJ & B OYCE M FG . C O . L TD Through: ...... R ESPONDEN T Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Advocate with Mr. Raji Abraham, AR of the Respondent. ======================================================================= CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. These petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) are objections to two separate but identical arbitral awards both dated 04.10.2013 . Since the award...
Moola Ram Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO2822012 13th March, 2014 % MOOLA RAM Through: ......Appellant Mr. Raj Kumar Rajput, Mr. Ajit Rajput, Advocates VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ...... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This matter was passed over on the first call when no one appeared for the respondent. Even on the second call no one appears for the respondent. I have hence heard counsel for the appellant and after perusing the record am proceeding to dispose of this appeal filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the impugned judgment dated 7.3.2012 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi by which the claim of the appellant/applicant has been dismissed.2. The facts of the case are that Kulra Ram @ Sonu, who used to do the job of boot polishing, son of appellant/applicant, died in an untoward incident on account of a fall from a ...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Ravish Kumar
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
S.A. Siddiqui, Member (Judicial): 1) This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dt. 08.06.2012. 2) Relevant facts relating to this appeal are that the complainant was allotted a flat No. 7, Sector-23, Pocket-6, Ist Floor, Category Cat, 2 Rohini under residential scheme of OP DDA under I SFS as per draw held on 01.08.1994. It was alleged that the complainant deposited entire instalments as per schedule of DDA and nothing was due against the complainant/respondent after full payment. Complainant/respondent requested the OP/appellant to handover physical possession of the flat. However, the officials of the appellant advised complainant/respondent to submit certain documents for taking possession. In compliance thereof, the complainant/respondent submitted required documents including affidavit, undertaking and conveyance deed duly stamped by collector of stamp Vikas Sadan vide receipt No. REC/H/07/14268 on 23.03.2007 and vide receipt No. REC/H/07/17678 on 11.04.2007 with O...
Cc, Lucknow Vs. S. Krishan and Co. Manglam Parivahn Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
Manmohan Singh, J. 1. All the six appeals filed by revenue are being disposed of by a common order as these arise out of the same impugned order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) as per Order-in-Appeal NO. 23-Cus/Alld/2012 dated 16.03.2012 vide which he set aside the order of original adjudicating authority and allowed all appeals of the respondents. 2. Going through the facts briefly, it is observed that the Customs officers intercepted one truck bearing registration number HR 69-2157 at a place near Raja Talab at Varanasi-Allahabad High way. The Truck was carrying Betel Nuts claimed to be imported from Bangladesh. The driver Santosh Singh on demand showed following papers namely - transit Declaration Form (Govt. of U.P.), - lorry Challan of M/s Manglam Parivahan Pvt. Ltd Kolkata, - bill of Entry having serial number 06530 dated 3-11-2010, - lorry Challan No. nil dated 14-11-2010 issued by M/s. Chandra Roadways, - tax invoice issued by M./s S. Krishna and co., - consignment note no. 30...
Amarjit Singh and ors. Vs. Attar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.197/2013 and C.M. Nos.13883/2013 & 1005/2014 (stay) 13th March, 2014 % AMARJIT SINGH AND ORS. Through: ......Appellants Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. VERSUS ATTAR SINGH Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Amarjit Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 18.4.2012 and the first appellate court dated 5.8.2013; by which the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for possession, declaration, injunction, recovery of arrears of rent etc was decreed by passing of decree for possession with respect to the suit premises being plot no.S-11-D, Second floor, Humanity House, Pandav Nagar, Delhi-110092. The respondent/plaintiff was also granted a decree for recovery of arrears of rent from 1.9.2009 till 30.6.2010 at...
V.K.Babbar Vs. Sunil Chopra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % V.K.BABBAR FAO No.377/2013 Through:13. h March, 2014 .....Appellant Mr. Himanshu, Adv. Appellant in person. VERSUS SUNIL CHOPRA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Shailendra Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Appellant who is an advocate has argued his case in person. This first appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC against the order of the trial court dated 19.8.2013 which while allowing the application of the appellantplaintiff for injunction in a suit for specific performance has directed the appellant-plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration of Rs.8,50,000/in court.2. The subject suit is a suit for specific performance of the agreement contained in the Bayana receipt/earnest money receipt dated 26.11.2010. The agreement to sell is with respect to the suit property bearing no.31/1, Basement, West Patel Nagar, New Del...
M/S Trans India Logistics Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1643/2014 & CM APPL.3425-3426/2014 Decided on :13. 03.2014 IN THE MATTER OF M/S TRANS INDIA LOGISTICS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Swetank Shantanu, Mr. Pratap Shankar and Mr. S.K. Dubey, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate with Ms. Sampa Sengupta Ray and Mr. Tarak Khanna, Advocates CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing of an order dated 18.02.2014 passed by the respondent No.4 informing it that the tenure of the lease period for the two lease contracts granted to it in respect of FSLR II and RSLR in train No.2626 had expired in one case, on 18.09.2010 and in the other case, on 19.01.2011 and therefore, it was not possible to consider its request for extension of the lease contract in terms of clause 18 of the agreement dated 05.0...
M/S Gwalior-jhansi Expressway Limited Vs. National Highway Authority o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: March 12, 2014 + O.M.P. No.302/2014 M/S GWALIOR -JHANSI EXPRESSWAY LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Meghna Mishra, Ms.Manmeet Kaur, Mr.Jatin Mongia & Mr.Gurmehar Sistani, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Adv. with Ms.Meenakshi Sood & Ms.Tanu Priya Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.4592/2014 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exemptions. The application is disposed of. OMP No.302/2014 1. The abovementioned petition has been filed by the petitioner, namely, M/s Gwalior-Jhansi Expressway Limited, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, inter-alia, seeking an injunction for restraining the respondent/NHAI from acting pursuant to the Notices of Intention for Termination of the Concession Agreement dated 27th February, 2014 and 7th March, 2014, includ...
Deepak @ Ghoda Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:04. 03.2014 Date of Decision:12. 03.2014 CRL.A. 719/2013 PARDEEP @ SANDY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. + CRL.A. 720/2013 DEEPAK @ GHODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 165/2014 PAWAN @ TAU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Varun Agrawal & Mr. Anwar A. Khan, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 29.08.2010, about about 12.45 pm, an information was received that a person had been robbed of his motorcycle Bajaj Discover, red colour, bearing registration number DL8 NC4908at Bawana Road, DSIDC, H-Block, Main Road. The information when conveyed to Police Station Bawana, wa...
Mohammed Ehsan Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 03.2014 + CRL. A.1273/2010 MOHAMMED EHSAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Jitender Sethi & Mr. H. Jailiya, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with S.I. Sunil Kumar, P.S. Tilak Marg. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(ORAL) On 8.10.2008, at about 10:40 p.m, Police Control Room was informed through mobile No.9211389388 that 5-6 boys had robbed the informant of his mobile phone and Rs.1,000/- in cash near India Gate Park, after putting a knife on his neck. The information, when conveyed to Police Station Tilak Marg, was recorded vide DD No.31A, a copy of which was given to S.I. Mukhtar Singh for investigation. The Investigation Officer, reached the spot where the complainant Rakesh Kumar was present. He alleged that on that day at about 10:30 p.m., when he was returning home after taking a walk at India Gate, four (4) young boys all of a sud...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »