Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S R.L. Varma and Sons (Huf) Vs. M/S Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1711/2014 and C.Ms. No.3584-85/2014 Decided on :14. 03.2014 IN THE MATTER OF M/S R.L. VARMA & SONS (HUF) ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate with Mrs.Aruna Verma versus M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Suresh Dutt Dobhal, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for staying the hands of the respondent/Bank from selling/auctioning the two properties, i.e., a residential premises bearing House No.A-123, New Friends Colony, New Delhi and a commercial property measuring 8160 sq. ft. situated on the 4th floor of Gopal Dass Bhawan, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi.2. Counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition had to be filed as the respondent/Bank has issued an auction notice dated 15.2.2014 in respect of the subject properties and the auction thereof is fixed for tomorrow, i.e., on 15.3...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Nahar Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 368/2010 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Adv. versus NAHAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Sandeep Chaudhary, Adv. for R2 and R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 08.04.2010 whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.2,85,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the offending vehicle was insured under Farmers Package Policy, but the same was being put to commercial use without any valid permit.3. Ld. Counsel further submits that the driver of the offending vehicle was under the influence of the alcohol at the time of accident. Therefore, the appellant is not under the cont...
Lalit Kumar Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. A. No.571/2012 Judgment reserved on :10. h February, 2014 Judgment pronounced on :13. h March, 2014 % LALIT KUMAR .....Appellant Through Mr. D.K. Thakur and Mr. Lallan Choudhary, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State along with SI Sukhvinder Sandhu, P.S. Gandhi Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT:1. Vide present appeal the appellant has challenged the order and judgment dated 1st March, 2012 by which the appellant had been convicted and sentence to undergo RI for seven years and also fine of Rs.500/-, in default SI for 15 days for the offence under Section 392/34 IPC read with Section 397 IPC.2. The prosecution case is that the complainant PW4 (Mr.Anil Aggarwal) had boarded the auto rickshaw of the appellant from Old Delhi Railway Station to Ganesh Nagar, Pandav Nagar at about 4.30 a.m. on 4.3.2010. As soon as PW4 had sat down in the TSR three more boys who were stan...
State Through Reference Vs. Ram Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE NO.6/2013 STATE THROUGH REFERENCE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. versus RAM SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate for Akshay Kumar and Vinay Sharma. Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate for Mukesh and Pawan Kumar Gupta. + CRL. APP. NO.1398/2013 PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA Through: versus STATE Through: + ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. CRL. APP. NO.1399/2013 MUKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE NO.6/2013, + CRL. APP. NO.1414/2013 VINAY SHARMA AND AN...
P.P.Singh Vs. C.B.i
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : October 07, 2013 DECIDED ON : March 13, 2014 + CRL.A. 358/2006 P.P.SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.N.Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mittal, Mr.Ankit Goyal, Mr.Ankur Aggarwal & Mr.Nitin Sharma, Advocates. Versus C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Spl.P.P. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. legality Dr.P.P.Singh (Prem Pal Singh-the appellant) challenges the and correctness of a judgment dated 06.05.2006 in R.C.No.79(A)/96/CBI/ACB/N.Delhi, CC No.133/01 of learned Special Judge, Delhi by which he was held guilty under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short PC Act). By an order on sentence dated 08.05.2006, he was awarded rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine `5,000/- under Section 7 and rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine `7,000/- under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of PC Act. Both the substantive sentences were...
Budh Prakash Vs. Sita Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. h March, 2014 MAC.APP. 782/2012 BUDH PRAKASH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Hari Shankar, Adv. versus SITA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Mukul Thakur, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 05.08.2010, whereby while awarding the compensation for an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum, ld. Tribunal has granted recovery rights against the appellant and in favour of respondent No.3 / Insurance company.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that he was proceeded ex-parte before the Ld. Tribunal. Therefore, he could not file the written statement and put his defence to the effect that on the date of accident, driver of the offending vehicle was holding valid and effective driving licence.3. It is pertinent to mention here that the appellant has placed ...
imran @ Irfan Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 1473/2010 IMRAN @ IRFAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr Deepak Vohra and Saurabh Shandilya, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 17.01.2009, at about 8.25 PM, Police Station Mansarovar Park was informed of a robber having been caught red handed near water overhead tank, Railway Station Street, Shri Ram Nagar. The information was recorded vide DD No.38A, copy of which was given to ASI Pawan Singh of the aforesaid Police Station for investigation. When the police officer reached the spot, Head Constable Parmod Kumar and Constable Manoj Kumar produced the appellant Imran, alongwith a buttondar knife and the stolen earrings. The complainant Jyoti was also present on the spot along with her husband. The statement of the complainant was recorded by the police officer. She, inter alia, told him that ...
Shahid Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :13. h MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A.144/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.350/2014 SHAHID ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mohd.Shamikh, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Shahid (the appellant), Mohd.Imran @ Kanchi, Mohd.Ali @ Babbu, Mohd. Furkan and Kamran @ Chhotu were suspects in case FIR No.367/2008 PS Khajuri Khas, Delhi. Allegations against them were that on 27.12.2008 at about 02.30 A.M. at C-186, Gali No.15, Khajuri Khas, Delhi, they committed dacoity and deprived the complainant Kartar Singh of ` 52,000/- and two gold chains at pistol point. The police machinery swung into action when information was conveyed regarding the incident and Daily Diary (DD) No.33A (Mark-14/PA) was recorded on 27.12.2008 at PS Khajuri Khas. The investigation was assigned to SI Rajender Singh who with Const. Brijpal went to the spot. Complainant Karta...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Smt Annie and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. h March, 2014 MAC.APP. 606/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. versus SMT ANNIE & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Navneet Goyal and Ms. Rupika Singh, Advs. for R1 to R5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 24.05.2013, whereby learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.19,88,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that deceased was 35 years of age at the time of accident. He was working as a Supervisor and was earning Rs.8,000/- per month. He left behind, wife, two sons and parents. However, Ld. Tribunal has awarded Rs.1,00,000/- each towards loss of love and affection and loss of consortium and Rs.25,000...
Ruchika Luthra Vs. Ashwani Garg and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 950/2012 RUCHIKA LUTHRA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Manish Maini, Advocate. Versus ASHWANI GARG & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for Respondent No.2/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 28.03.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.6,16,496/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that PW1, Smt. Ruchika Luthra, widow of the deceased had deposed that on the date of the accident her husband was 25 years of age. He was in the business of embroidery, earning Rs...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »