Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.N. Madanasekaran (injured) Thr Lrs Vs. Ram Niwas and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC. APP. No.224/2013 % Judgment delivered on:18. h March, 2014 A.N. MADANASEKARAN (INJURED) THR LRS...... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ashwarya Sinha and Mr.Srijan Sinha, Advocates. Versus RAM NIWAS & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Abhinav Agnihotri, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 15.09.2012, whereby Ld. Tribunal awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.4,19,764/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that Ld. Tribunal erred by awarding Rs.2,18,944/- towards treatment and medicines, whereas the total cost of surgeries its...
Vishal Narula Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 12, 2014 Decision on: March 18, 2014 CRL.A. No.248 of 2008 VISHAL NARULA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Kakkar, Advocate. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR J UDGMENT1803.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1st March 2008 passed by the Special Judge, Delhi in Complaint Case No.23/03 convicting the Appellant of the offences under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) punishable under Section 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 3rd March 2008 sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for two years and fine of Rs.5,000 and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for two months for the offence under Section 7 of PC Act and to undergo RI for two years and fine of Rs.5,000 and in default to undergo SI for two months for the offence under Section 13 (2) PC Act. Both sentences were...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sulo and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18th March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 265/2007 & CM No.17912/2013 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.L.Gupta and Mr. Ram Ashray, Advocates. Versus SULO & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.N.K.Jha, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 265/2007 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned judgment dated 15.03.2007, whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.6,28,000/- with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. It is pertinent to mention here that earlier vide judgment dated 10.10.2007, this Court dismissed the present appeal. The same was challenged before the Supreme Court. While setting aside the aforesaid judgment dated 10.10.2007, the Apex Court directed this Court to decide the present appeal on mer...
Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Soni Vs. N.C.B.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. 03.2014 Date of Decision:18. 03.2014 + CRL. A.944 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR YADAV @ SONI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.K. Santoshi & Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advs. versus N.C.B. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.The case of the respondent NCB, in nutshell, is as follows. On 16.9.2004 at about 6.00 pm, Shri N.S.Yadav, Intelligence Officer of NCB received a secret information that one person, namely, Soni aged about 22-23 years and resident of kharkhari Jatmal, Nazafgarh, Delhi would deliver about 10 kilogram of hashish out of the huge quantity of 75 kilogram received by him, to one of his customers at Subji Mandi, Nazafgarh between 3.00 pm to 4.00 pm on the next day. After the information had been reduced into writing and submitted to a superior officer, a search authorization was drawn in favour of Shri H.K.Pandey, Intelligence Officer and a team consisting of M...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Jang Bahadur Bhalla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 03.2014 + CRL. A.56 of 2010 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. ..... Appellant versus JANG BAHADUR BHALLA Through: Mr. Vinod Asri, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ..... Respondent JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 29.10.2003, on inspecting SFS flat No.194, Pocket-I, Sector 9 of Dwarka, it was found, by Shri R.K. Verma, Junior Engineer (Enforcement) of DDA, that a furniture workshop under the name and style of Panchanan Furniture was functioning in the whole of the flat and as many as ten (10) persons were working there in an area measuring 90 sq.mtrs. The respondent Jang Bahadur Bhalla was found present at the time of inspection and he admitted to be the person who had permitted the use of the aforesaid premises for the furniture workshop though he refused to sign the inspection report.2. Based upon the aforesaid inspection, a complaint under Section 14 read with Section 29(2) of Delhi Devel...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sumit Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.867 /2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Savita Singh and Mr.Puneet Verma, Advocates. Versus SUMIT SHARMA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Deepak Bhandari, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 08.07.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.17,72,500/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company submits that the respondent No.1/claimant has failed to prove his salary, despite that while computing the loss of earning capacity due to disability, the learned Tribunal has assessed the annual income of the claimant / injured as Rs.1,85,000/- per a...
Chanderkesh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :11.3.2014 Judgment delivered on:18. 3.2014 CRL.A. 205/2006 CHANDERKESH Through ..... Appellant Mr. H.K. Sharma, Mr. Mohit Aggarwal and Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advs. Versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr. Varun Goswami, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 17.3.2006 and 18.3.2006 wherein the appellant Chanderkesh has been convicted under Section 7 and Section 13(1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 (hereinafter referred to the as the said Act); for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the said Act he has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for two months; for the offence under Section 7 of the said Act he has been sentenced to undergo RI for six months and to pa...
Commissioner of Income Tax-xvi Vs. Shri Atul Kumar Swami
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2014 % + ITA1122014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI ..... Appellant Through Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, sr. standing counsel versus SHRI ATUL KUMAR SWAMI ..... Respondent Through Mr Salil Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.: (OPEN COURT) The revenue is in appeal aggrieved by the order dated 20.9.2013 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) whereby the assessees appeal was allowed.2. The assessee had in respect of assessment year 1999-2000 in the note filed together with the accounts and the returns disclosed that he received a sum of Rs.88 lakhs as one-time non-compete fee. He concededly paid advance tax of Rs.27,60,600/- on the same. He states that this was a one-time capital receipt; the return was processed under section 143(1). The revenue sought to reopen the assessment recording reasons for doing so as follows by its notice dated 09.01....
State Vs. Bhagwati and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h February, 2014 Pronounced on:18. h March, 2014 + CRL. L.P.509/2013 STATE Through ..... Appellant Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, A.S.C for the State. versus BHAGWATI & ANR. Through .... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.CRL. L.P.509/2013 and Crl.M.A.14084/2013 (delay) 1. The State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 17.09.2012 passed in Sessions Case No.74/2010 (FIR No.888/2003, Police Station Rohini) whereby the Respondents were acquitted of the charge for the offence punishable under Sections 302/201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).2. As per prosecution version, on 08.10.2003 at about 3:30 p.m., an information was received by Sanjay Gupta (PW-4), Station Superintendent, Uttaranchal Transport Corporation that a jute bag (bora) was lying on the right side parking lot of Dehradun Bus Depot. He was further informed that th...
Arun and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h February, 2014 Pronounced on:18. h March, 2014 + CRL.A. 773/2011 & Crl.M.(B).2332/2013 ARUN & ORS. Through ..... Appellants Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for Appellant No.1 Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate for Appellants No.2 & 3. versus STATE Through + ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP CRL.A. 646/2011 PRITHVI RAJ Through ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Advocates versus STATE + Through CRL.A. 1094/2011 ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP KRISHAN KUMAR @ KRISHNA ..... Appellant Through Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellants Arun Kumar, Ram Parkash @ Guddu, Krishan Kumar @ Krishna, Prithvi Raj and Rani impugn the judgment dated 26.02.2011 and the order on sentence dated 15.03.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), West 02, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »