Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
inder Sharma Vs. Vikas Nagpal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: February 05, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: March 18, 2014 + RFA(OS) 143/2013 INDER SHARMA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Arun Singh Bawa, Advocate with Ms.Sonali Chopra, Advocate versus VIKAS NAGPAL Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Amit Dayal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Holding that the Courts at Delhi lack territorial jurisdiction to entertain the plaint filed by the appellant in the Delhi High Court vide impugned order dated September 16, 2013 the plaint has been directed to be returned for being presented to the Court having jurisdiction, which Court has not been identified by the learned Single Judge, but has to be the City Civil Court in Gurgaon, Haryana, for the reason the view taken by the learned Single Judge is that since the decree as per prayer (c) pertaining to the receipt dated August 28, 2009 impinged upon property No.A-...
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Jagpal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18th March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 288/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vishvendra Verma, Ms.Shivali and Mr.Pranav, Advocates. Versus JAGPAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned judgment dated 27.01.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.1,28,830/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. It is pertinent to mention here that respondent No.3 was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 02.05.2011 passed by this Court and respondent No.2 had been served through publication, despite, appearing none on their behalf.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company submitted that the m...
Tassavur Vs. Dri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$-8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :18. h MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A. 599/2012 TASSAVUR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Shahid Azad, Advocate. versus DRI Through : AND + ..... Respondent Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate. CRL.A. 767/2012 & CRL.M.A.No.1429/2013 MUKAIL ADEBAYO Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Tassavur (A-1) and Mukail Adebayo (A-2) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 03.03.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge - NDPS in Sessions Case No.30A/06 by which they were held guilty of committing offence punishable under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act. By an order on sentence dated 06.03.2012, they were awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 1 lac, each.2. Allegations against the appellants were that on 20.11.2005 at about 11.00 A.M., an intelligence was received by PW-...
Ashok Kumar Chaturvedi Vs. Uco Bank and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 18, 2014 + RFA(OS)129/2013 ASHOK KUMAR CHATURVEDI .. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Arun Batta, Advocate versus UCO BANK & ORS. ....Respondent Represented by: Ms.Ruchi Singh and Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J (Oral) CM No.15905/2013 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. RFA(OS)129/2013 1. The present Regular First Appeal is filed by the appellant aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the suit of the appellant in limini without issue of notice to the respondents i.e. defendants to the Suit.2. The appellant filed the present suit for recovery of `3,00,34,606/- (Rupees Three Crore Thirty Four thousand six hundred and six only)and for decree of declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction. Respondent No.1 is a public sector bank. Resp...
Gautam JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Writ Petition (Crl.) No.2060/2013 Reserved on:6. h March, 2014 Date of Decision:18. h March, 2014 % GAUTAM JAIN ....Petitioner Through Mr. B. Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen Malhotra and Mr. Nitendra Kumar, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents Through Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Mr. Anish Dhingra and Mr. Vasundhara Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Gautam Jain, detenu, impugns detention order dated 23 rd September, 2009 under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (Act, for short). He has prayed for issue of writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing his detention with a prayer that he should be set forth at liberty.2. The respondent Union of India, Ministry of Finance have contested the proceedings and have filed counter affidavit and an additio...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Adarsh Kant Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2014 + CONT. CAS. (CRL.) 2/2013 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through ..... Petitioner versus ADARSH KANT KAPOOR ..... Respondent In person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Crl.M.A. Nos.17931/2013 & 4012/2014 & Cont. Cas. (Crl.) 2/2013 Criminal contempt proceedings were initiated against the respondent Adarsh Kant Kapoor by orders dated 15th /22nd March, 2013 passed by a single Judge in RSA552013, Adarsh Kant Kapoor Vs. Chief Justice of India and Others. During the pendency of the said contempt proceedings in view of subsequent developments, by orders dated 21st October, 2013 and 28th February, 2014, two more show cause notices were issued to the respondent Adarsh Kant Kapoor.2. The respondent, a person of Indian origin, it is stated, is a doctor and a lawyer in the United States of America.3. During the pendency of the contempt proceedings, the respondent had ...
Shyam Lal Vs. State(Govt of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. h March, 2014 Pronounced on:18. h March, 2014 + CRL.A.1058/2010 SHYAM LAL ..... Appellant Through Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE(GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellant Shyam Lal impugns the judgment and the order on sentence dated 30.01.2010 and 16.02.2010 respectively passed in Sessions Case No.97/1/08 (arising out of FIR No.89/08, P.S. J.P. Kalan) whereby he was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of which he was to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.2. DD No.15A dated 28.08.2008 regarding some quarrel in front of shop of appellant Shyam Lal was assigned to ASI Mahender Singh (PW24). He along with Consta...
Smt. Manju and ors. Vs. Akhtar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~R35A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. h March, 2014 MAC.APP. No.1055-57/2006 SMT. MANJU AND ORS. Represented by: .... Appellants Mr. Peeush Sharma, Adv. Versus AKHTAR AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 31.08.2006, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.5,45,000/- with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount noted above.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that deceased was 25 years of age at the time of accident. He was working as a driver and was earning Rs.5,000/- per month. However, the appellants failed to prove the salary of the deceased, Ld. Tribunal has assessed his monthly income as Rs.3,589/- as...
Y.L. Malhotra Vs. Sahab Ali Khan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$~R35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.1043/2006 Y.L. MALHOTRA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Peeush Sharma, Adv. Versus SAHAB ALI KHAN & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 18.10.2006, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide this appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant received injuries in the accident took place on 04.06.2001 when he was travelling along with his wife and others in a FIAT Car No.DNH-1485 driven by Mr. Vinod Oberoi. They were coming from Rishikesh and were goi...
Mukail Adebayo Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2014
$-8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :18. h MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A. 599/2012 TASSAVUR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Shahid Azad, Advocate. versus DRI Through : AND + ..... Respondent Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate. CRL.A. 767/2012 & CRL.M.A.No.1429/2013 MUKAIL ADEBAYO Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Tassavur (A-1) and Mukail Adebayo (A-2) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 03.03.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge - NDPS in Sessions Case No.30A/06 by which they were held guilty of committing offence punishable under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act. By an order on sentence dated 06.03.2012, they were awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 1 lac, each.2. Allegations against the appellants were that on 20.11.2005 at about 11.00 A.M., an intelligence was received by PW-...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »